Cited by 19Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksGene Regulatory Network Analysis

A Graph Feature Auto-Encoder for the prediction of unobserved node features on biological networks

Open access
Hasibi, Ramin, Michoel, Tom·2021·BMC Bioinformatics

Abstract

Background: Molecular interaction networks summarize complex biological processes as graphs, whose structure is informative of biological function at multiple scales. Simultaneously, omics technologies measure the variation or activity of genes, proteins, or metabolites across individuals or experimental conditions. Integrating the complementary viewpoints of biological networks and omics data is an important task in bioinformatics, but existing methods treat networks as discrete structures, which are intrinsically difficult to integrate with continuous node features or activity measures. Graph neural networks map graph nodes into a low-dimensional vector space representation, and can be trained to preserve both the local graph structure and the similarity between node features. Results: We studied the representation of transcriptional, protein–protein and genetic interaction networks in E. coli and mouse using graph neural networks. We found that such representations explain a large proportion of variation in gene expression data, and that using gene expression data as node features improves the reconstruction of the graph from the embedding. We further proposed a new end-to-end Graph Feature Auto-Encoder framework for the prediction of node features utilizing the structure of the gene networks, which is trained on the feature prediction task, and showed that it performs better at predicting unobserved node features than regular MultiLayer Perceptrons. When applied to the problem of imputing missing data in single-cell RNAseq data, the Graph Feature Auto-Encoder utilizing our new graph convolution layer called FeatGraphConv outperformed a state-of-the-art imputation method that does not use protein interaction information, showing the benefit of integrating biological networks and omics data with our proposed approach. Conclusion: Our proposed Graph Feature Auto-Encoder framework is a powerful approach for integrating and exploiting the close relation between molecular interaction networks and functional genomics data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12859-021-04447-3

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gene Ontology terms are a standardized vocabulary for molecular functions, biological processes, and cellular locations of gene products.

    “Gene Ontology (GO) terms [125] are a standardized vocabulary for describing molecular functions, biological processes, and cellular locations of gene products [126].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [125]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Faith JJ Driscoll ME Fusaro VA Cosgrove EJ Hayete B Juhn FS Schneider SJ Gardner TS Many microbe microarrays database: uniformly normalized affymetrix compendia with structured experimental metadata Nucleic Acids Res 2008 36 Database-Issue 866 870 PMC2238822 17932051

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasibi, R., & Michoel, T.
Affiliations
University of Bergen (NO)
Corresponding author
Hasibi, Ramin
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2021-10-27
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
525-525
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3117334649
Cited by
19
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd (312045)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
molecular interaction networks, protein-protein interaction network, genetic interaction networks, gene expression, graph convolution, graph neural networks, Escherichia coli, mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Escherichia coli, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Mice, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review