Cited by 10Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFungal and yeast genetics research

Genome-scale metabolic models reveal determinants of phenotypic differences in non-Saccharomyces yeasts

Open access
Pettersen, Jakob P., Castillo, Sandra, Jouhten, Paula, Almaas, Eivind·2023·BMC Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Use of alternative non- Saccharomyces yeasts in wine and beer brewing has gained more attention the recent years. This is both due to the desire to obtain a wider variety of flavours in the product and to reduce the final alcohol content. Given the metabolic differences between the yeast species, we wanted to account for some of the differences by using in silico models. Results: We created and studied genome-scale metabolic models of five different non- Saccharomyces species using an automated processes. These were: Metschnikowia pulcherrima , Lachancea thermotolerans , Hanseniaspora osmophila , Torulaspora delbrueckii and Kluyveromyces lactis . Using the models, we predicted that M. pulcherrima , when compared to the other species, conducts more respiration and thus produces less fermentation products, a finding which agrees with experimental data. Complex I of the electron transport chain was to be present in M. pulcherrima , but absent in the others. The predicted importance of Complex I was diminished when we incorporated constraints on the amount of enzymatic protein, as this shifts the metabolism towards fermentation. Conclusions: Our results suggest that Complex I in the electron transport chain is a key differentiator between Metschnikowia pulcherrima and the other yeasts considered. Yet, more annotations and experimental data have the potential to improve model quality in order to increase fidelity and confidence in these results. Further experiments should be conducted to confirm the in vivo effect of Complex I in M. pulcherrima and its respiratory metabolism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12859-023-05506-7

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Pettersen, J. P., Castillo, S., Jouhten, P., & Almaas, E.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
  • Aalto University (FI)
Corresponding author
  • Pettersen, Jakob P.
  • Almaas, Eivind
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2023-11-21
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
438-438
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388857212
Cited by
10
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Norwegian Research Council (283862)
  • NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
non-Saccharomyces yeasts, genome-scale metabolic models, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Lachancea thermotolerans, Hanseniaspora osmophila, Torulaspora delbrueckii, Kluyveromyces lactis, electron transport chain, complex I, brewing yeast, automated model construction, phenotypic differences
MeSH terms
Fermentation, Wine, Yeasts, Metschnikowia, Torulaspora

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review