Cited by 23Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionGene Regulatory Network AnalysisBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Data integration across conditions improves turnover number estimates and metabolic predictions

Open access
Wendering, Philipp, Arend, Marius, Razaghi-Moghadam, Zahra, Nikoloski, Zoran·2023·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Turnover numbers characterize a key property of enzymes, and their usage in constraint-based metabolic modeling is expected to increase the prediction accuracy of diverse cellular phenotypes. In vivo turnover numbers can be obtained by integrating reaction rate and enzyme abundance measurements from individual experiments. Yet, their contribution to improving predictions of condition-specific cellular phenotypes remains elusive. Here, we show that available in vitro and in vivo turnover numbers lead to poor prediction of condition-specific growth rates with protein-constrained models of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae , particularly when protein abundances are considered. We demonstrate that correction of turnover numbers by simultaneous consideration of proteomics and physiological data leads to improved predictions of condition-specific growth rates. Moreover, the obtained estimates are more precise than corresponding in vitro turnover numbers. Therefore, our approach provides the means to correct turnover numbers and paves the way towards cataloguing kcatomes of other organisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-37151-2

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wendering, P., Arend, M., Razaghi-Moghadam, Z., & Nikoloski, Z.
Affiliations
University of Potsdam (DE)
Corresponding author
Nikoloski, Zoran
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-03-17
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1485-1485
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4327742365
Cited by
23
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (862201, 739582)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
enzyme turnover number, constraint-based metabolic modeling, Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, enzyme abundance, metabolic phenotyping
MeSH terms
Escherichia coli, Models, Biological, Metabolic Networks and Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review