Cited by 29Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMachine Learning in BioinformaticsFractal and DNA sequence analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protein embedding based alignment

Open access
Iovino, Benjamin Giovanni, Ye, Yuzhen·2024·BMC Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the many progresses with alignment algorithms, aligning divergent protein sequences with less than 20–35% pairwise identity (so called "twilight zone") remains a difficult problem. Many alignment algorithms have been using substitution matrices since their creation in the 1970’s to generate alignments, however, these matrices do not work well to score alignments within the twilight zone. We developed Protein Embedding based Alignments, or PEbA, to better align sequences with low pairwise identity. Similar to the traditional Smith-Waterman algorithm, PEbA uses a dynamic programming algorithm but the matching score of amino acids is based on the similarity of their embeddings from a protein language model. Methods: We tested PEbA on over twelve thousand benchmark pairwise alignments from BAliBASE, each one extracted from one of their multiple sequence alignments. Five different BAliBASE references were used, each with different sequence identities, motifs, and lengths, allowing PEbA to showcase how well it aligns under different circumstances. Results: PEbA greatly outperformed BLOSUM substitution matrix-based pairwise alignments, achieving different levels of improvements of the alignment quality for pairs of sequences with different levels of similarity (over four times as well for pairs of sequences with <10% identity). We also compared PEbA with embeddings generated by different protein language models (ProtT5 and ESM-2) and found that ProtT5-XL-U50 produced the most useful embeddings for aligning protein sequences. PEbA also outperformed DEDAL and vcMSA, two recently developed protein language model embedding-based alignment methods. Conclusion: Our results suggested that general purpose protein language models provide useful contextual information for generating more accurate protein alignments than typically used methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12859-024-05699-5

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Altschul Stephen F, Gish Warren, Miller Webb, Myers Eugene W, Lipman David J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–10. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Doolittle RF. ORFS A A primer on how to analyze derived amino acid sequences. Sausalito: University Science Books; 1986.
  3. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1992;89(22):10915–9. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Illergård Kristoffer, Ardell David H, Elofsson Arne. Structure is three to ten times more conserved than sequence a study of structural response in protein cores. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf. 2009;77(3):499–508. · DOI
  5. Frank Keul, Martin Hess, Michael Goesele, Kay Hamacher. PFASUM: a substitution matrix from pfam structural alignments. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18(1):1–14. · DOI
  6. Llinares-López Felipe, Berthet Quentin, Blondel Mathieu, Teboul Olivier, Vert Jean-Philippe. Deep embedding and alignment of protein sequences. Nat Methods. 2022;20(1):104–11. · DOI · Paper page
  7. McWhite CD, Armour-Garb I, Singh M. Leveraging protein language models for accurate multiple sequence alignments. Genome Res. 2023;33(7):1145–53.
  8. Mistry Jaina, Chuguransky Sara, Williams Lowri, Qureshi Matloob, Salazar Gustavo A, Sonnhammer Erik L L, Tosatto Silvio C E, Paladin Lisanna, Raj Shriya, Richardson Lorna J, Finn Robert D, Bateman Alex. Pfam: the protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;49(D1):D412–9. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Needleman Saul B, Wunsch Christian D. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol. 1970;48(3):443–53. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ofer Dan, Brandes Nadav, Linial Michal. The language of proteins: NLP, machine learning and protein sequences. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:1750–8. · DOI
  11. Rost Burkhard. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng Des Sel. 1999;12(2):85–94. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Schütze K, Heinzinger M, Steinegger M, Rost B. Nearest neighbor search on embeddings rapidly identifies distant protein relations. Front Bioinform. 2022;2:1033775. · DOI
  13. Sievers Fabian, Wilm Andreas, Dineen David, Gibson Toby J, Karplus Kevin, Li Weizhong, Lopez Rodrigo, McWilliam Hamish, Remmert Michael, Söding Johannes, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using clustal omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7(1):539. · DOI
  14. Steinegger M, Söding J. Clustering huge protein sequence sets in linear time. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5242. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Thompson Julie D, Koehl Patrice, Ripp Raymond, Poch Olivier. BAliBASE 3.0: latest developments of the multiple sequence alignment benchmark. Proteins: Struct Funct, Bioinf. 2005;61(1):127–36. · DOI
  16. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez A N, Kaiser L, Polosukhin I. Attention is all you need. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst 2017;30
  17. Yuzhen Ye, Adam Godzik. Flexible structure alignment by chaining aligned fragment pairs allowing twists. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(suppl2):246–55.

Metadata

Authors
Iovino, B. G., & Ye, Y.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Ye, Yuzhen
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2024-02-28
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
85-85
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392235646
Cited by
29
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1R01AI143254)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
Keywords
protein sequence alignment, twilight zone, protein embeddings, protein language models, substitution matrices, BLOSUM, ProtT5, ESM-2, dynamic programming alignment, low sequence identity, BAliBASE
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Boronic Acids, Proteins, Sequence Alignment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review