The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein embedding based alignment
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Purpose: Despite the many progresses with alignment algorithms, aligning divergent protein sequences with less than 20–35% pairwise identity (so called "twilight zone") remains a difficult problem. Many alignment algorithms have been using substitution matrices since their creation in the 1970’s to generate alignments, however, these matrices do not work well to score alignments within the twilight zone. We developed Protein Embedding based Alignments, or PEbA, to better align sequences with low pairwise identity. Similar to the traditional Smith-Waterman algorithm, PEbA uses a dynamic programming algorithm but the matching score of amino acids is based on the similarity of their embeddings from a protein language model. Methods: We tested PEbA on over twelve thousand benchmark pairwise alignments from BAliBASE, each one extracted from one of their multiple sequence alignments. Five different BAliBASE references were used, each with different sequence identities, motifs, and lengths, allowing PEbA to showcase how well it aligns under different circumstances. Results: PEbA greatly outperformed BLOSUM substitution matrix-based pairwise alignments, achieving different levels of improvements of the alignment quality for pairs of sequences with different levels of similarity (over four times as well for pairs of sequences with <10% identity). We also compared PEbA with embeddings generated by different protein language models (ProtT5 and ESM-2) and found that ProtT5-XL-U50 produced the most useful embeddings for aligning protein sequences. PEbA also outperformed DEDAL and vcMSA, two recently developed protein language model embedding-based alignment methods. Conclusion: Our results suggested that general purpose protein language models provide useful contextual information for generating more accurate protein alignments than typically used methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,990
ProtTrans: Toward Understanding the Language of Life Through Self-Supervised Learning
Elnaggar, A., Heinzinger, M., Dallago, C., Rehawi, G., Wang, Y., Jones, L., Gibbs, T., Feher, T., Angerer, C., Steinegger, M., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3095381 · Cited by 2,329
UniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches
Suzek, B. E., Wang, Y., Huang, H., McGarvey, P. B., Wu, C. H., & the UniProt Consortium (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu739 · Cited by 1,928
Protein-level assembly increases protein sequence recovery from metagenomic samples manyfold
Steinegger, M., Mirdita, M., & Söding, J. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0437-4 · Cited by 445 · cited 1×
“This approach can be applied to protein sequences where language models are trained on large protein databases, like UniRef50 [21], UniRef100 [21], and BFD [20] [19], and are able to learn about the “language of life” [4].”
MethodFATCAT 2.0: towards a better understanding of the structural diversity of proteins
Li, Z., Jaroszewski, L., Iyer, M., Sedova, M., & Godzik, A. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa443 · Cited by 231
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Altschul Stephen F, Gish Warren, Miller Webb, Myers Eugene W, Lipman David J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–10. · DOI · Paper page
- Doolittle RF. ORFS A A primer on how to analyze derived amino acid sequences. Sausalito: University Science Books; 1986.
- Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1992;89(22):10915–9. · DOI · Paper page
- Illergård Kristoffer, Ardell David H, Elofsson Arne. Structure is three to ten times more conserved than sequence a study of structural response in protein cores. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf. 2009;77(3):499–508. · DOI
- Frank Keul, Martin Hess, Michael Goesele, Kay Hamacher. PFASUM: a substitution matrix from pfam structural alignments. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18(1):1–14. · DOI
- Llinares-López Felipe, Berthet Quentin, Blondel Mathieu, Teboul Olivier, Vert Jean-Philippe. Deep embedding and alignment of protein sequences. Nat Methods. 2022;20(1):104–11. · DOI · Paper page
- McWhite CD, Armour-Garb I, Singh M. Leveraging protein language models for accurate multiple sequence alignments. Genome Res. 2023;33(7):1145–53.
- Mistry Jaina, Chuguransky Sara, Williams Lowri, Qureshi Matloob, Salazar Gustavo A, Sonnhammer Erik L L, Tosatto Silvio C E, Paladin Lisanna, Raj Shriya, Richardson Lorna J, Finn Robert D, Bateman Alex. Pfam: the protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;49(D1):D412–9. · DOI · Paper page
- Needleman Saul B, Wunsch Christian D. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol. 1970;48(3):443–53. · DOI · Paper page
- Ofer Dan, Brandes Nadav, Linial Michal. The language of proteins: NLP, machine learning and protein sequences. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:1750–8. · DOI
- Rost Burkhard. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng Des Sel. 1999;12(2):85–94. · DOI · Paper page
- Schütze K, Heinzinger M, Steinegger M, Rost B. Nearest neighbor search on embeddings rapidly identifies distant protein relations. Front Bioinform. 2022;2:1033775. · DOI
- Sievers Fabian, Wilm Andreas, Dineen David, Gibson Toby J, Karplus Kevin, Li Weizhong, Lopez Rodrigo, McWilliam Hamish, Remmert Michael, Söding Johannes, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using clustal omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7(1):539. · DOI
- Steinegger M, Söding J. Clustering huge protein sequence sets in linear time. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5242. · DOI · Paper page
- Thompson Julie D, Koehl Patrice, Ripp Raymond, Poch Olivier. BAliBASE 3.0: latest developments of the multiple sequence alignment benchmark. Proteins: Struct Funct, Bioinf. 2005;61(1):127–36. · DOI
- Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez A N, Kaiser L, Polosukhin I. Attention is all you need. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst 2017;30
- Yuzhen Ye, Adam Godzik. Flexible structure alignment by chaining aligned fragment pairs allowing twists. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(suppl2):246–55.
Metadata
- Authors
- Iovino, B. G., & Ye, Y.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ye, Yuzhen
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2024-02-28
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-85
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10900708
- OpenAlex
- W4392235646
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6
- FWCI
- 3.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1R01AI143254)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
- Keywords
- protein sequence alignment, twilight zone, protein embeddings, protein language models, substitution matrices, BLOSUM, ProtT5, ESM-2, dynamic programming alignment, low sequence identity, BAliBASE
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Boronic Acids, Proteins, Sequence Alignment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review