A hybrid machine learning framework for functional annotation of mitochondrial glutathione transport and metabolism proteins in cancers
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Alterations of metabolism, including changes in mitochondrial metabolism as well as glutathione (GSH) metabolism are a well appreciated hallmark of many cancers. Mitochondrial GSH (mGSH) transport is a poorly characterized aspect of GSH metabolism, which we investigate in the context of cancer. Existing functional annotation approaches from machine (ML) or deep learning (DL) models based only on protein sequences, were unable to annotate functions in biological contexts. Results: We develop a flexible ML framework for functional annotation from diverse feature data. This hybrid ML framework leverages cancer cell line multi-omics data and other biological knowledge data as features, to uncover potential genes involved in mGSH metabolism and membrane transport in cancers. This framework achieves strong performance across functional annotation tasks and several cell line and primary tumor cancer samples. For our application, classification models predict the known mGSH transporter SLC25A39 but not SLC25A40 as being highly probably related to mGSH metabolism in cancers. SLC25A10, SLC25A50, and orphan SLC25A24, SLC25A43 are predicted to be associated with mGSH metabolism in multiple biological contexts and structural analysis of these proteins reveal similarities in potential substrate binding regions to the binding residues of SLC25A39. Conclusion: These findings have implications for a better understanding of cancer cell metabolism and novel therapeutic targets with respect to GSH metabolism through potential novel functional annotations of genes. The hybrid ML framework proposed here can be applied to other biological function classifications or multi-omics datasets to generate hypotheses in various biological contexts. Code and a tutorial for generating models and predictions in this framework are available at: https://github.com/lkenn012/mGSH_cancerClassifiers .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
The human protein atlas: a spatial map of the human proteome
Thul, P. J., & Lindskog, C. (2018) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3307 · Cited by 1,299 · see citing works
Harnessing protein folding neural networks for peptide–protein docking
Tsaban, T., Varga, J. K., Avraham, O., Ben-Aharon, Z., Khramushin, A., & Schueler-Furman, O. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27838-9 · Cited by 1,205 · see citing works
Biologically informed deep neural network for prostate cancer discovery
Elmarakeby, H. A., Hwang, J., Arafeh, R., Crowdis, J., Gang, S., Liu, D., AlDubayan, S. H., Salari, K., Kregel, S., Richter, C., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03922-4 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Zheng, Y., Lin, J., Liu, D., Wan, G., Gu, X., & Ma, J. (2022) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-022-04754-4 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Kennedy, L., Sandhu, J. K., Harper, M.-E., & Cuperlovic-Culf, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Harper, Mary-Ellen
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2025-02-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-48
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11817629
- OpenAlex
- W4407364035
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NPARC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Council Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN 143278)
- National Research Council Canada’s New Beginnings Initiative-Ideation Fund
- NSERC-CREATE Metabolomics Advanced Training and International Exchange Program
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- mitochondrial glutathione, glutathione transport, functional annotation, cancer metabolism, mitochondrial metabolism, SLC25A10, cancer cell lines, multi-omics, hybrid machine learning, substrate binding residues, therapeutic target
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Biological Transport, Glutathione, Humans, Mitochondria, Neoplasms, Cell Line, Tumor, Molecular Sequence Annotation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review