Cited by 4Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMachine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

A hybrid machine learning framework for functional annotation of mitochondrial glutathione transport and metabolism proteins in cancers

Open access
Kennedy, Luke, Sandhu, Jagdeep K., Harper, Mary-Ellen, Cuperlovic-Culf, Miroslava·2025·BMC Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Alterations of metabolism, including changes in mitochondrial metabolism as well as glutathione (GSH) metabolism are a well appreciated hallmark of many cancers. Mitochondrial GSH (mGSH) transport is a poorly characterized aspect of GSH metabolism, which we investigate in the context of cancer. Existing functional annotation approaches from machine (ML) or deep learning (DL) models based only on protein sequences, were unable to annotate functions in biological contexts. Results: We develop a flexible ML framework for functional annotation from diverse feature data. This hybrid ML framework leverages cancer cell line multi-omics data and other biological knowledge data as features, to uncover potential genes involved in mGSH metabolism and membrane transport in cancers. This framework achieves strong performance across functional annotation tasks and several cell line and primary tumor cancer samples. For our application, classification models predict the known mGSH transporter SLC25A39 but not SLC25A40 as being highly probably related to mGSH metabolism in cancers. SLC25A10, SLC25A50, and orphan SLC25A24, SLC25A43 are predicted to be associated with mGSH metabolism in multiple biological contexts and structural analysis of these proteins reveal similarities in potential substrate binding regions to the binding residues of SLC25A39. Conclusion: These findings have implications for a better understanding of cancer cell metabolism and novel therapeutic targets with respect to GSH metabolism through potential novel functional annotations of genes. The hybrid ML framework proposed here can be applied to other biological function classifications or multi-omics datasets to generate hypotheses in various biological contexts. Code and a tutorial for generating models and predictions in this framework are available at: https://github.com/lkenn012/mGSH_cancerClassifiers .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12859-025-06051-1

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kennedy, L., Sandhu, J. K., Harper, M.-E., & Cuperlovic-Culf, M.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Harper, Mary-Ellen
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2025-02-11
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
48-48
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407364035
Cited by
4
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NPARC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Council Canada
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN 143278)
  • National Research Council Canada’s New Beginnings Initiative-Ideation Fund
  • NSERC-CREATE Metabolomics Advanced Training and International Exchange Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
mitochondrial glutathione, glutathione transport, functional annotation, cancer metabolism, mitochondrial metabolism, SLC25A10, cancer cell lines, multi-omics, hybrid machine learning, substrate binding residues, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Biological Transport, Glutathione, Humans, Mitochondria, Neoplasms, Cell Line, Tumor, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review