Cited by 52Evolution and Paleontology StudiesGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesPlant Diversity and Evolution

Divergence time estimation of Galliformes based on the best gene shopping scheme of ultraconserved elements

Open access
Chen, De, Hosner, Peter A., Dittmann, Donna L., O’Neill, John P., Birks, Sharon M., Braun, Edward L., Kimball, Rebecca T.·2021·BMC Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

Background: Divergence time estimation is fundamental to understanding many aspects of the evolution of organisms, such as character evolution, diversification, and biogeography. With the development of sequence technology, improved analytical methods, and knowledge of fossils for calibration, it is possible to obtain robust molecular dating results. However, while phylogenomic datasets show great promise in phylogenetic estimation, the best ways to leverage the large amounts of data for divergence time estimation has not been well explored. A potential solution is to focus on a subset of data for divergence time estimation, which can significantly reduce the computational burdens and avoid problems with data heterogeneity that may bias results. Results: In this study, we obtained thousands of ultraconserved elements (UCEs) from 130 extant galliform taxa, including representatives of all genera, to determine the divergence times throughout galliform history. We tested the effects of different “gene shopping” schemes on divergence time estimation using a carefully, and previously validated, set of fossils. Our results found commonly used clock-like schemes may not be suitable for UCE dating (or other data types) where some loci have little information. We suggest use of partitioning (e.g., PartitionFinder) and selection of tree-like partitions may be good strategies to select a subset of data for divergence time estimation from UCEs. Our galliform time tree is largely consistent with other molecular clock studies of mitochondrial and nuclear loci. With our increased taxon sampling, a well-resolved topology, carefully vetted fossil calibrations, and suitable molecular dating methods, we obtained a high quality galliform time tree. Conclusions: We provide a robust galliform backbone time tree that can be combined with more fossil records to further facilitate our understanding of the evolution of Galliformes and can be used as a resource for comparative and biogeographic studies in this group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12862-021-01935-1

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. [2]Ho SYW The changing face of the molecular evolutionary clock Trends Ecol Evol 2014 29 9 496 503 25086668
  2. [3]Jarvis ED Mirarab S Aberer AJ Li B Houde P Li C Ho SYW Faircloth BC Nabholz B Howard JT Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds Science 2014 346 6215 1320 1331 25504713 PMC4405904
  3. [4]Liu L Zhang J Rheindt FE Lei F Qu Y Wang Y Zhang Y Sullivan C Nie W Wang J Genomic evidence reveals a radiation of placental mammals uninterrupted by the KPg boundary Proc Natl Acad Sci 2017 114 35 E7282 E7290 28808022 PMC5584403
  4. [6]Kuhl H Frankl-Vilches C Bakker A Mayr G Nikolaus G Boerno ST Klages S Timmermann B Gahr M An unbiased molecular approach using 3′-UTRs resolves the avian family-level tree of life Mol Biol Evol 2020 38 1 108 127 PMC7783168 32781465
  5. [7]Springer MS Foley NM Brady PL Gatesy J Murphy WJ Evolutionary models for the diversification of placental mammals across the KPg boundary Front Genet 2019 10 1241 31850081 PMC6896846
  6. [9]Parham JF Donoghue PCJ Bell CJ Calway TD Head JJ Holroyd PA Inoue JG Irmis RB Joyce WG Ksepka DT Best practices for justifying fossil calibrations Syst Biol 2011 61 2 346 359 22105867 PMC3280042
  7. [11]Hosner PA Braun EL Kimball RT Rapid and recent diversification of curassows, guans, and chachalacas (Galliformes: Cracidae) out of Mesoamerica: phylogeny inferred from mitochondrial, intron, and ultraconserved element sequences Mol Phylogenet Evol 2016 102 320 330 27369454
  8. [12]Delsuc F Brinkmann H Philippe H Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life Nat Rev Genet 2005 6 5 361 375 15861208
  9. [13]Braun EL Cracraft J Houde P Kraus RHS Resolving the avian tree of life from top to bottom: the promise and potential boundaries of the phylogenomic era Avian genomics in ecology and evolution: from the lab into the wild 2019 Cham Springer 151 210
  10. [14]Sun K Meiklejohn KA Faircloth BC Glenn TC Braun EL Kimball RT The evolution of peafowl and other taxa with ocelli (eyespots): a phylogenomic approach Proc R Soc Lond B 2014 281 1790 20140823 PMC4123699 25030982
  11. [15]Meiklejohn KA Faircloth BC Glenn TC Kimball RT Braun EL Analysis of a rapid evolutionary radiation using ultraconserved elements: evidence for a bias in some multispecies coalescent methods Syst Biol 2016 65 4 612 627 26865273
  12. [16]Moyle RG Oliveros CH Andersen MJ Hosner PA Benz BW Manthey JD Travers SL Brown RM Faircloth BC Tectonic collision and uplift of Wallacea triggered the global songbird radiation Nat Commun 2016 7 12709 27575437 PMC5013600
  13. [17]Bejerano G Pheasant M Makunin I Stephen S Kent WJ Mattick JS Haussler D Ultraconserved elements in the human genome Science 2004 304 5675 1321 1325 15131266
  14. [18]Faircloth BC McCormack JE Crawford NG Harvey MG Brumfield RT Glenn TC Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales Syst Biol 2012 61 5 717 726 22232343
  15. [19]Alfaro ME Faircloth BC Harrington RC Sorenson L Friedman M Thacker CE Oliveros CH Černý D Near TJ Explosive diversification of marine fishes at the Cretaceous–Palaeogene boundary Nat Ecol Evol 2018 2 4 688 696 29531346
  16. [20]Kieran TJ Gordon ERL Forthman M Hoey-Chamberlain R Kimball RT Faircloth BC Weirauch C Glenn TC Insight from an ultraconserved element bait set designed for hemipteran phylogenetics integrated with genomic resources Mol Phylogenet Evol 2019 130 297 303 30359745
  17. [21]Oliveros CH Field DJ Ksepka DT Barker FK Aleixo A Andersen MJ Alström P Benz BW Braun EL Braun MJ Earth history and the passerine superradiation Proc Natl Acad Sci 2019 116 16 7916 7925 30936315 PMC6475423
  18. [24]Harvey MG Bravo GA Claramunt S Cuervo AM Derryberry GE Battilana J Seeholzer GF McKay JS O’Meara BC Faircloth BC The evolution of a tropical biodiversity hotspot Science 2020 370 6522 1343 1348 33303617
  19. [25]McCormack JE Tsai WLE Faircloth BC Sequence capture of ultraconserved elements from bird museum specimens Mol Ecol Resour 2016 16 5 1189 1203 26391430
  20. [26]Hosner PA Faircloth BC Glenn TC Braun EL Kimball RT Avoiding missing data biases in phylogenomic inference: an empirical study in the landfowl (Aves: Galliformes) Mol Biol Evol 2016 33 4 1110 1125 26715628
  21. [27]Wang N Hosner PA Liang B Braun EL Kimball RT Historical relationships of three enigmatic phasianid genera (Aves: Galliformes) inferred using phylogenomic and mitogenomic data Mol Phylogenet Evol 2017 109 217 225 28088402
  22. [28]Drummond AJ Rambaut A BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees BMC Evol Biol 2007 7 1 214 17996036 PMC2247476
  23. [29]Ho SYW Duchêne S Molecular-clock methods for estimating evolutionary rates and timescales Mol Ecol 2014 23 24 5947 5965 25290107
  24. [30]Wolfe JM Breinholt JW Crandall KA Lemmon AR Lemmon EM Timm LE Siddall ME Bracken-Grissom HD A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans Proc R Soc B 1901 2019 286 20190079 PMC6501934 31014217
  25. [31]Hosner PA Tobias JA Braun EL Kimball RT How do seemingly non-vagile clades accomplish trans-marine dispersal? Trait and dispersal evolution in the landfowl (Aves: Galliformes) Proc R Soc B 1854 2017 284 20170210 PMC5443944 28469029
  26. [32]Smith SA Brown JW Walker JF So many genes, so little time: a practical approach to divergence-time estimation in the genomic era PLoS ONE 2018 13 5 e0197433 29772020 PMC5957400
  27. [33]Gill F, Donsker D, Rasmussen P (Eds) IOC World Bird List (v11.2); 2021. 10.14344/IOC.ML.11.2. · DOI
  28. [34]Wang N Kimball RT Braun EL Liang B Zhang Z Assessing phylogenetic relationships among Galliformes: a multigene phylogeny with expanded taxon sampling in Phasianidae PLoS ONE 2013 8 5 e64312 23741315 PMC3669371
  29. [35]Kimball RT Braun EL Does more sequence data improve estimates of galliform phylogeny? Analyses of a rapid radiation using a complete data matrix PeerJ 2014 2 e361 24795852 PMC4006227
  30. [36]Persons NW Hosner PA Meiklejohn KA Braun EL Kimball RT Sorting out relationships among the grouse and ptarmigan using intron, mitochondrial, and ultra-conserved element sequences Mol Phylogenet Evol 2016 98 123 132 26879712
  31. [38]Stein RW Brown JW Mooers AØ A molecular genetic time scale demonstrates Cretaceous origins and multiple diversification rate shifts within the order Galliformes (Aves) Mol Phylogenet Evol 2015 92 155 164 26140861
  32. [39]Chifman J Kubatko L Quartet inference from SNP data under the coalescent model Bioinformatics 2014 30 23 3317 3324 25104814 PMC4296144
  33. [40]Lanfear R Frandsen PB Wright AM Senfeld T Calcott B PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses Mol Biol Evol 2017 34 3 772 773 28013191
  34. [41]Jetz W Thomas GH Joy JB Hartmann K Mooers AO The global diversity of birds in space and time Nature 2012 491 7424 444 448 23123857
  35. [43]Birks SM Edwards SV A phylogeny of the megapodes (Aves: Megapodiidae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences Mol Phylogenet Evol 2002 23 3 408 421 12099795
  36. [44]Reddy S Kimball RT Pandey A Hosner PA Braun MJ Hackett SJ Han K-L Harshman J Huddleston CJ Kingston S Why do phylogenomic data sets yield conflicting trees? Data type influences the avian tree of life more than taxon sampling Syst Biol 2017 66 5 857 879 28369655
  37. [47]Crowe TM Bowie RCK Bloomer P Mandiwana TG Hedderson TAJ Randi E Pereira SL Wakeling J Phylogenetics, biogeography and classification of, and character evolution in, gamebirds (Aves: Galliformes): effects of character exclusion, data partitioning and missing data Cladistics 2006 22 6 495 532 34892896
  38. [49]Bonilla AJ Braun EL Kimball RT Comparative molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of 3′-UTRs and introns in Galliformes Mol Phylogenet Evol 2010 56 2 536 542 20398778
  39. [50]Chen D Braun EL Forthman M Kimball RT Zhang Z A simple strategy for recovering ultraconserved elements, exons, and introns from low coverage shotgun sequencing of museum specimens: placement of the partridge genus Tropicoperdix within the galliformes Mol Phylogenet Evol 2018 129 304 314 30201427
  40. [51]O’Reilly JE dos Reis M Donoghue PCJ Dating tips for divergence-time estimation Trends Genet 2015 31 11 637 650 26439502
  41. [52]Darriba D Weiß M Stamatakis A Prediction of missing sequences and branch lengths in phylogenomic data Bioinformatics 2016 32 9 1331 1337 26733454
  42. [53]Zheng Y Wiens JJ Do missing data influence the accuracy of divergence-time estimation with BEAST? Mol Phylogenet Evol 2015 85 41 49 25681677
  43. [56]Mayr G The early Eocene birds of the Messel fossil site: a 48 million-year-old bird community adds a temporal perspective to the evolution of tropical avifaunas Biol Rev 2017 92 2 1174 1188 27062331
  44. [57]Balasubramaniam P Rotenberry JT Elevation and latitude interact to drive life-history variation in precocial birds: a comparative analysis using galliformes J Anim Ecol 2016 85 6 1528 1539 27392151
  45. [60]Faircloth BC Glenn TC Not all sequence tags are created equal: designing and validating sequence identification tags robust to indels PLoS ONE 2012 7 8 e42543 22900027 PMC3416851
  46. [61]Schmieder R Edwards R Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets Bioinformatics 2011 27 6 863 864 21278185 PMC3051327
  47. [62]Bolger AM Lohse M Usadel B Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data Bioinformatics 2014 30 15 2114 2120 24695404 PMC4103590
  48. [63]Grabherr MG Haas BJ Yassour M Levin JZ Thompson DA Amit I Adiconis X Fan L Raychowdhury R Zeng Q Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome Nat Biotechnol 2011 29 7 644 652 21572440 PMC3571712
  49. [64]Faircloth BC PHYLUCE is a software package for the analysis of conserved genomic loci Bioinformatics 2016 32 5 786 788 26530724
  50. [65]Katoh K Standley DM MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software Version 7: improvements in performance and usability Mol Biol Evol 2013 30 4 772 780 23329690 PMC3603318
  51. [66]Stamatakis A RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies Bioinformatics 2014 30 9 1312 1313 24451623 PMC3998144
  52. [68]Blair C Murphy RW Recent trends in molecular phylogenetic analysis: where to next? J Hered 2010 102 1 130 138 20696667
  53. [69]Portik DM Smith LL Bi K An evaluation of transcriptome-based exon capture for frog phylogenomics across multiple scales of divergence (Class: Amphibia, Order: Anura) Mol Ecol Resour 2016 16 5 1069 1083 27241806
  54. [70]Yang Z PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood Mol Biol Evol 2007 24 8 1586 1591 17483113
  55. [71]Ksepka DT Broken gears in the avian molecular clock: new phylogenetic analyses support stem galliform status for Gallinuloides wyomingensis and rallid affinities for Amitabha urbsinterdictensis Cladistics 2009 25 2 173 197 34879603
  56. [72]Cracraft J Houde P Ho SYW Mindell DP Fjeldså J Lindow B Edwards SV Rahbek C Mirarab S Warnow T Response to Comment on “Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds” Science 2015 349 6255 1460 1460 26404820

Authors
Chen, D., Hosner, P. A., Dittmann, D. L., O’Neill, J. P., Birks, S. M., Braun, E. L., & Kimball, R. T.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Kimball, Rebecca T.
Venue
BMC Ecology and Evolution
Published
2021-11-22
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
209-209
ISSN
2730-7182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3217113965
Cited by
52
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31601839)
  • Villum Fonden for the Center for Global Mountain Biodiversity (25925)
  • National Science Foundation (DEB- 1118823)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
Galliformes, divergence time estimation, ultraconserved elements, fossil calibration, molecular clock, phylogenomics, partition selection
MeSH terms
Animals, Fossils, Phylogeny, Time, Galliformes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review