The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using recursive feature elimination in random forest to account for correlated variables in high dimensional data
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Random forest (RF) is a machine-learning method that generally works well with high-dimensional problems and allows for nonlinear relationships between predictors; however, the presence of correlated predictors has been shown to impact its ability to identify strong predictors. The Random Forest-Recursive Feature Elimination algorithm (RF-RFE) mitigates this problem in smaller data sets, but this approach has not been tested in high-dimensional omics data sets. RESULTS: We integrated 202,919 genotypes and 153,422 methylation sites in 680 individuals, and compared the abilities of RF and RF-RFE to detect simulated causal associations, which included simulated genotype-methylation interactions, between these variables and triglyceride levels. Results show that RF was able to identify strong causal variables with a few highly correlated variables, but it did not detect other causal variables. CONCLUSIONS: Although RF-RFE decreased the importance of correlated variables, in the presence of many correlated variables, it also decreased the importance of causal variables, making both hard to detect. These findings suggest that RF-RFE may not scale to high-dimensional data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., & Vapnik, V. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1012487302797 · Cited by 9,954
Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases
Manolio, T. A., Collins, F. S., Cox, N. J., Goldstein, D. B., Hindorff, L. A., Hunter, D. J., McCarthy, M. I., Ramos, E. M., Cardon, L. R., Chakravarti, A., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08494 · Cited by 8,336
LocusZoom: regional visualization of genome-wide association scan results
Pruim, R. J., Welch, R. P., Sanna, S., Teslovich, T. M., Chines, P. S., Gliedt, T. P., Boehnke, M., Abecasis, G. R., & Willer, C. J. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq419 · Cited by 2,707
Methods of integrating data to uncover genotype-phenotype interactions
Ritchie, M. D., Holzinger, E. R., Li, R., Pendergrass, S. A., & Kim, D. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3868 · Cited by 1,085
Cited by
Zhang, X., Zhong, H., Li, Y., Shi, Z., Ren, H., Zhang, Z., Zhou, X., Tang, S., Han, X., Lin, Y., et al. (2021) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-020-00014-2 · Cited by 250
Lu, Y., Lavoie‐Gagne, O., Forlenza, E. M., Pareek, A., Kunze, K. N., Forsythe, B., Levy, B. A., & Krych, A. J. (2022) · Arthroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.12.012 · Cited by 28
Zatorski, N., Sun, Y., Elmas, A., Dallago, C., Karl, T., Stein, D., Rost, B., Huang, K.-L., Walsh, M., & Schlessinger, A. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.110640 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Darst, B. F., Malecki, K. C., & Engelman, C. D.
- Venue
- BMC Genetics
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 65-65
- ISSN
- 1471-2156 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2891385203
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 21.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using recursive feature elimination in random forest to account for correlated variables in high dimensional data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12863-018-0633-8
- The paper
- Darst, B. F., Malecki, K. C., & Engelman, C. D. (2018). Using recursive feature elimination in random forest to account for correlated variables in high dimensional data. BMC Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-018-0633-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.