Cited by 31RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Selective forces and mutational biases drive stop codon usage in the human genome: a comparison with sense codon usage

Open access
Trotta, Edoardo·2016·BMC Genomics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The three stop codons UAA, UAG, and UGA signal the termination of mRNA translation. As a result of a mechanism that is not adequately understood, they are normally used with unequal frequencies. RESULTS: In this work, we showed that selective forces and mutational biases drive stop codon usage in the human genome. We found that, in respect to sense codons, stop codon usage was affected by stronger selective forces but was less influenced by neutral mutational biases. UGA is the most frequent termination codon in human genome. However, UAA was the preferred stop codon in genes with high breadth of expression, high level of expression, AT-rich coding sequences, housekeeping functions, and in gene ontology categories with the largest deviation from expected stop codon usage. Selective forces associated with the breadth and the level of expression favoured AT-rich sequences in the mRNA region including the stop site and its proximal 3'-UTR, but acted with scarce effects on sense codons, generating two regions, upstream and downstream of the stop codon, with strongly different base composition. By favouring low levels of GC-content, selection promoted labile local secondary structures at the stop site and its proximal 3'-UTR. The compositional and structural context favoured by selection was surprisingly emphasized in the class of ribosomal proteins and was consistent with sequence elements that increase the efficiency of translational termination. Stop codons were also heterogeneously distributed among chromosomes by a mechanism that was strongly correlated with the GC-content of coding sequences. CONCLUSIONS: In human genome, the nucleotide composition and the thermodynamic stability of stop codon site and its proximal 3'-UTR are correlated with the GC-content of coding sequences and with the breadth and the level of gene expression. In highly expressed genes stop codon usage is compositionally and structurally consistent with highly efficient translation termination signals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12864-016-2692-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. [1]Kryukov GV Castellano S Novoselov SV Lobanov AV Zehtab O Guigo R Characterization of mammalian selenoproteomes Science 2003 300 5624 1439 1443 10.1126/science.1083516 12775843 · DOI
  2. [2]Walczak R Westhof E Carbon P Krol A A novel RNA structural motif in the selenocysteine insertion element of eukaryotic selenoprotein mRNAs RNA 1996 2 4 367 379 8634917 PMC1369379
  3. [3]Costantini M Bernardi G Correlations between coding and contiguous non-coding sequences in isochore families from vertebrate genomes Gene 2008 410 2 241 248 10.1016/j.gene.2007.12.016 18252269 · DOI
  4. [4]Chen SL Lee W Hottes AK Shapiro L McAdams HH Codon usage between genomes is constrained by genome-wide mutational processes Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004 101 10 3480 3485 10.1073/pnas.0307827100 14990797 PMC373487 · DOI
  5. [5]Kotlar D Lavner Y The action of selection on codon bias in the human genome is related to frequency, complexity, and chronology of amino acids BMC Genomics 2006 7 67 10.1186/1471-2164-7-67 16584540 PMC1456966 · DOI
  6. [6]Novoa EM Pavon-Eternod M Pan T Ribas de Pouplana L A role for tRNA modifications in genome structure and codon usage Cell 2012 149 1 202 213 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.050 22464330 · DOI
  7. [7]Yang ZH Nielsen R Mutation-selection models of codon substitution and their use to estimate selective strengths on codon usage Mol Biol Evol 2008 25 3 568 579 10.1093/molbev/msm284 18178545 · DOI
  8. [8]Vogel C Abreu Rde S Ko D Le SY Shapiro BA Burns SC Sequence signatures and mRNA concentration can explain two-thirds of protein abundance variation in a human cell line Mol Syst Biol 2010 6 400 10.1038/msb.2010.59 20739923 PMC2947365 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [9]Hiraoka Y Kawamata K Haraguchi T Chikashige Y Codon usage bias is correlated with gene expression levels in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Genes Cells 2009 14 4 499 509 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2009.01284.x 19335619 · DOI
  10. [10]Kanaya S Yamada Y Kinouchi M Kudo Y Ikemura T Codon usage and tRNA genes in eukaryotes: Correlation of codon usage diversity with translation efficiency and with CG-dinucleotide usage as assessed by multivariate analysis J Mol Evol 2001 53 4–5 290 298 10.1007/s002390010219 11675589 · DOI
  11. [11]Lavner Y Kotlar D Codon bias as a factor in regulating expression via translation rate in the human genome Gene 2005 345 1 127 138 10.1016/j.gene.2004.11.035 15716084 · DOI
  12. [12]Blanchet S Rowe M Von der Haar T Fabret C Demais S Howard MJ New insights into stop codon recognition by eRF1 Nucleic Acids Res 2015 43 6 3298 3308 10.1093/nar/gkv154 25735746 PMC4381064 · DOI
  13. [13]Kryuchkova P Grishin A Eliseev B Karyagina A Frolova L Alkalaeva E Two-step model of stop codon recognition by eukaryotic release factor eRF1 Nucleic Acids Res 2013 41 8 4573 4586 10.1093/nar/gkt113 23435318 PMC3632111 · DOI
  14. [14]Sun JC Chen M Xu JL Luo JH Relationships among stop codon usage bias, its context, isochores, and gene expression level in various eukaryotes J Mol Evol 2005 61 4 437 444 10.1007/s00239-004-0277-3 16170455 · DOI
  15. [15]Trotta E Selection on codon bias in yeast: a transcriptional hypothesis Nucleic Acids Res 2013 41 20 9382 9395 10.1093/nar/gkt740 23945943 PMC3814355 · DOI
  16. [16]Kochetov AV Ischenko IV Vorobiev DG Kel AE Babenko VN Kisselev LL Eukaryotic mRNAs encoding abundant and scarce proteins are statistically dissimilar in many structural features FEBS Lett 1998 440 3 351 355 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01482-3 9872401 · DOI
  17. [17]Manuvakhova M Keeling K Bedwell DM Aminoglycoside antibiotics mediate context-dependent suppression of termination codons in a mammalian translation system RNA 2000 6 7 1044 1055 10.1017/S1355838200000716 10917599 PMC1369979 · DOI
  18. [18]McCaughan KK Brown CM Dalphin ME Berry MJ Tate WP Translational termination efficiency in mammals is influenced by the base following the stop codon Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995 92 12 5431 5435 10.1073/pnas.92.12.5431 7777525 PMC41708 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [19]Shabalina SA Ogurtsov AY Spiridonov NA A periodic pattern of mRNA secondary structure created by the genetic code Nucleic Acids Res 2006 34 8 2428 2437 10.1093/nar/gkl287 16682450 PMC1458515 · DOI
  20. [20]Tatarinova TV Alexandrov NN Bouck JB Feldmann KA GC3 biology in corn, rice, sorghum and other grasses BMC Genomics 2010 11 308 10.1186/1471-2164-11-308 20470436 PMC2895627 · DOI
  21. [21]Najafabadi HS Goodarzi H Salavati R Universal function-specificity of codon usage Nucleic Acids Res 2009 37 21 7014 7023 10.1093/nar/gkp792 19773421 PMC2790905 · DOI
  22. [22]Ashburner M Ball CA Blake JA Botstein D Butler H Cherry JM Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium Nat Genet 2000 25 1 25 29 10.1038/75556 10802651 PMC3037419 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [23]Lercher MJ Urrutia AO Pavlicek A Hurst LD A unification of mosaic structures in the human genome Hum Mol Genet 2003 12 19 2411 2415 10.1093/hmg/ddg251 12915446 · DOI
  24. [24]McCall MN Jaffee HA Zelisko SJ Sinha N Hooiveld G Irizarry RA The Gene Expression Barcode 3.0: improved data processing and mining tools Nucleic Acids Res 2014 42 Database issue D938 D943 10.1093/nar/gkt1204 24271388 PMC3965035 · DOI
  25. [25]Zhang Y Li D Sun B Do housekeeping genes exist? PLoS One 2015 10 5 e0123691 10.1371/journal.pone.0123691 25970694 PMC4430495 · DOI
  26. [26]Mele M Ferreira PG Reverter F DeLuca DS Monlong J Sammeth M Human genomics. The human transcriptome across tissues and individuals Science 2015 348 6235 660 665 10.1126/science.aaa0355 25954002 PMC4547472 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [28]Chen C Zhang H Broitman SL Reiche M Farrell I Cooperman BS Dynamics of translation by single ribosomes through mRNA secondary structures Nat Struct Mol Biol 2013 20 5 582 588 10.1038/nsmb.2544 23542154 PMC3648610 · DOI
  28. [29]Wen JD Lancaster L Hodges C Zeri AC Yoshimura SH Noller HF Following translation by single ribosomes one codon at a time Nature 2008 452 7187 598 603 10.1038/nature06716 18327250 PMC2556548 · DOI
  29. [30]Seffens W Digby D mRNAs have greater negative folding free energies than shuffled or codon choice randomized sequences Nucleic Acids Res 1999 27 7 1578 1584 10.1093/nar/27.7.1578 10075987 PMC148359 · DOI
  30. [31]Brown CM Stockwell PA Trotman CNA Tate WP Sequence-Analysis Suggests That Tetra-Nucleotides Signal the Termination of Protein-Synthesis in Eukaryotes Nucleic Acids Res 1990 18 21 6339 6345 10.1093/nar/18.21.6339 2123028 PMC332501 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [32]Somogyi P Jenner AJ Brierley I Inglis SC Ribosomal pausing during translation of an RNA pseudoknot Mol Cell Biol 1993 13 11 6931 6940 10.1128/MCB.13.11.6931 8413285 PMC364755 · DOI
  32. [33]Barreau C Paillard L Osborne HB AU-rich elements and associated factors: are there unifying principles? Nucleic Acids Res 2005 33 22 7138 7150 10.1093/nar/gki1012 16391004 PMC1325018 · DOI
  33. [34]Charlesworth A Meijer HA de Moor CH Specificity factors in cytoplasmic polyadenylation Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 2013 4 4 437 461 10.1002/wrna.1171 23776146 PMC3736149 · DOI
  34. [35]Proudfoot NJ Ending the message: poly(A) signals then and now Genes Dev 2011 25 17 1770 1782 10.1101/gad.17268411 21896654 PMC3175714 · DOI
  35. [36]Wang W Nag S Zhang X Wang MH Wang H Zhou J Ribosomal proteins and human diseases: pathogenesis, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic implications Med Res Rev 2015 35 2 225 285 10.1002/med.21327 25164622 PMC4710177 · DOI
  36. [37]Zhou X Liao WJ Liao JM Liao P Lu H Ribosomal proteins: functions beyond the ribosome J Mol Cell Biol 2015 7 2 92 104 10.1093/jmcb/mjv014 25735597 PMC4481666 · DOI
  37. [38]Farrell CM O’Leary NA Harte RA Loveland JE Wilming LG Wallin C Current status and new features of the Consensus Coding Sequence database Nucleic Acids Res 2014 42 Database issue D865 D872 10.1093/nar/gkt1059 24217909 PMC3965069 · DOI
  38. [39]Pruitt KD Brown GR Hiatt SM Thibaud-Nissen F Astashyn A Ermolaeva O RefSeq: an update on mammalian reference sequences Nucleic Acids Res 2014 42 Database issue D756 D763 10.1093/nar/gkt1114 24259432 PMC3965018 · DOI
  39. [40]Esnaola M Puig P Gonzalez D Castelo R Gonzalez JR A flexible count data model to fit the wide diversity of expression profiles arising from extensively replicated RNA-seq experiments BMC Bioinformatics 2013 14 254 10.1186/1471-2105-14-254 23965047 PMC3849762 · DOI
  40. [41]Nakao A Yoshihama M Kenmochi N RPG: the Ribosomal Protein Gene database Nucleic Acids Res 2004 32 Database issue D168 D170 10.1093/nar/gkh004 14681386 PMC308739 · DOI
  41. [42]Knuth DE The art of computer programming: seminumerical algorithms 1997 3 Boston Addison-Wesley
  42. [44]Lorenz R Bernhart SH Honer Zu Siederdissen C Tafer H Flamm C Stadler PF ViennaRNA Package 2.0. Algorithms Mol Biol: AMB 2011 6 26 10.1186/1748-7188-6-26 22115189 PMC3319429 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Trotta, E.
Affiliations
Istituto di Farmacologia Traslazionale (IT)
Corresponding author
Trotta, Edoardo
Venue
BMC Genomics
Published
2016-05-17
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
366-366
ISSN
1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2403896150
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Genomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
codon usage bias, mutational bias, natural selection, UGA, unnatural amino acids, UAG, GC content, gene expression breadth, ribosomal proteins, translation termination, human genome
MeSH terms
Base Composition, Codon, Gene Expression Regulation, Gene Frequency, Humans, Mutation, Selection, Genetic, Transcription, Genetic, Genome, Human, Open Reading Frames, Codon, Terminator, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, RNA Stability, Gene Ontology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review