The DOI matches its Crossref record; 153 of the 153 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomes and secretomes of Ascomycota fungi reveal diverse functions in plant biomass decomposition and pathogenesis
Open accessAbstract
Background: The dominant fungi in arid grasslands and shrublands are members of the Ascomycota phylum. Ascomycota fungi are important drivers in carbon and nitrogen cycling in arid ecosystems. These fungi play roles in soil stability, plant biomass decomposition, and endophytic interactions with plants. They may also form symbiotic associations with biocrust components or be latent saprotrophs or pathogens that live on plant tissues. However, their functional potential in arid soils, where organic matter, nutrients and water are very low or only periodically available, is poorly characterized. Results: Five Ascomycota fungi were isolated from different soil crust microhabitats and rhizosphere soils around the native bunchgrass Pleuraphis jamesii in an arid grassland near Moab, UT, USA. Putative genera were Coniochaeta, isolated from lichen biocrust,Embellisia from cyanobacteria biocrust, Chaetomium from below lichen biocrust,Phoma from a moss microhabitat, and Aspergillus from the soil. The fungi were grown in replicate cultures on different carbon sources (chitin, native bunchgrass or pine wood) relevant to plant biomass and soil carbon sources. Secretomes produced by the fungi on each substrate were characterized. Results demonstrate that these fungi likely interact with primary producers (biocrust or plants) by secreting a wide range of proteins that facilitate symbiotic associations. Each of the fungal isolates secreted enzymes that degrade plant biomass, small secreted effector proteins, and proteins involved in either beneficial plant interactions or virulence.Aspergillus and Phoma expressed more plant biomass degrading enzymes when grown in grass- and pine-containing cultures than in chitin.Coniochaeta and Embellisia expressed similar numbers of these enzymes under all conditions, while Chaetomium secreted more of these enzymes in grass-containing cultures. Conclusions: This study of Ascomycota genomes and secretomes provides important insights about the lifestyles and the roles that Ascomycota fungi likely play in arid grassland, ecosystems. However, the exact nature of those interactions, whether any or all of the isolates are true endophytes, latent saprotrophs or opportunistic phytopathogens, will be the topic of future studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G., & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 · Cited by 12,654
Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs
Zerbino, D. R., & Birney, E. (2008) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.074492.107 · Cited by 9,491
KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs
Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Tanabe, M., Sato, Y., & Morishima, K. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1092 · Cited by 8,865
Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis
Wiśniewski, J. R., Zougman, A., Nagaraj, N., & Mann, M. (2009) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1322 · Cited by 8,352
Improved Prediction of Signal Peptides: SignalP 3.0
Dyrløv Bendtsen, J., Nielsen, H., von Heijne, G., & Brunak, S. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028 · Cited by 6,350
The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future
Finn, R. D., Coggill, P., Eberhardt, R. Y., Eddy, S. R., Mistry, J., Mitchell, A. L., Potter, S. C., Punta, M., Qureshi, M., Sangrador-Vegas, A., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1344 · Cited by 5,975
Bennett, J. W., & Klich, M. (2003) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.16.3.497-516.2003 · Cited by 3,127
InterProScan: protein domains identifier
Quevillon, E., Silventoinen, V., Pillai, S., Harte, N., Mulder, N., Apweiler, R., & Lopez, R. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki442 · Cited by 3,015
AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts
Stanke, M., Keller, O., Gunduz, I., Hayes, A., Waack, S., & Morgenstern, B. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkl200 · Cited by 2,829
Metadata
- Authors
- Challacombe, J. F., Hesse, C. N., Bramer, L. M., McCue, L. A., Lipton, M., Purvine, S., Nicora, C., Gallegos-Graves, L. V., Porras-Alfaro, A., & Kuske, C. R.
- Venue
- BMC Genomics
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 976-976
- ISSN
- 1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2995671733
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 153
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomes and secretomes of Ascomycota fungi reveal diverse functions in plant biomass decomposition and pathogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12864-019-6358-x
- The paper
- Challacombe, J. F., Hesse, C. N., Bramer, L. M., McCue, L. A., Lipton, M., Purvine, S., Nicora, C., Gallegos-Graves, L. V., Porras-Alfaro, A., & Kuske, C. R. (2019). Genomes and secretomes of Ascomycota fungi reveal diverse functions in plant biomass decomposition and pathogenesis. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6358-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.