Cited by 130Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchGenomics and Rare Diseases

Tracy: basecalling, alignment, assembly and deconvolution of sanger chromatogram trace files

Open access
Rausch, Tobias, Fritz, Markus Hsi-Yang, Untergasser, Andreas, Benes, Vladimir·2020·BMC Genomics

Abstract

Background: DNA sequencing is at the core of many molecular biology laboratories. Despite its long history, there is a lack of user-friendly Sanger sequencing data analysis tools that can be run interactively as a web application or at large-scale in batch from the command-line. Results: We present Tracy, an efficient and versatile command-line application that enables basecalling, alignment, assembly and deconvolution of sequencing chromatogram files. Its companion web applications make all functionality of Tracy easily accessible using standard web browser technologies and interactive graphical user interfaces. Tracy can be easily integrated in large-scale pipelines and high-throughput settings, and it uses state-of-the-art file formats such as JSON and BCF for reporting chromatogram sequencing results and variant calls. The software is open-source and freely available at https://github.com/gear-genomics/tracy, the companion web applications are hosted at https://www.gear-genomics.com. Conclusions: Tracy can be routinely applied in large-scale validation efforts conducted in clinical genomics studies as well as for high-throughput genome editing techniques that require a fast and rapid method to confirm discovered variants or engineered mutations. Molecular biologists benefit from the companion web applications that enable installation-free Sanger chromatogram analyses using intuitive, graphical user interfaces.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12864-020-6635-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 72% of the hygromycin-resistant clones harbored the TP53W53* mutation.

    “72% of the hygromycin-resistant clones harbored the mutation (Supplementary Fig. 2b, c)38.”

    From One-step generation of tumor models by base editor multiplexing in adult stem cell-derived organoids (2023) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Results passage lists clone-level examples used to assess Tracy’s performance, but gives no proportion of hygromycin-resistant clones with a TP53W53* mutation. Searches for the mutation and for hygromycin-resistant clones found no passage reporting the claimed 72%. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [1]Shendure J Balasubramanian S Church GM Gilbert W Rogers J Schloss JA Waterston RH DNA sequencing at 40: past, present and future Nature 2017 550 7676 345 53 29019985
  2. [2]Sudmant PH Rausch T Gardner EJ Handsaker RE Abyzov A Huddleston J Zhang Y Ye K Jun G Fritz MH Konkel MK Malhotra A Stutz AM Shi X Casale FP Chen J Hormozdiari F Dayama G Chen K Malig M Chaisson MJP Walter K Meiers S Kashin S Garrison E Auton A Lam HYK Mu XJ Alkan C Antaki D Bae T Cerveira E Chines P Chong Z Clarke L Dal E Ding L Emery S Fan X Gujral M Kahveci F Kidd JM Kong Y Lameijer EW McCarthy S Flicek P Gibbs RA Marth G Mason CE Menelaou A Muzny DM Nelson BJ Noor A Parrish NF Pendleton M Quitadamo A Raeder B Schadt EE Romanovitch M Schlattl A Sebra R Shabalin AA Untergasser A Walker JA Wang M Yu F Zhang C Zhang J Zheng-Bradley X Zhou W Zichner T Sebat J Batzer MA McCarroll SA Mills RE Gerstein MB Bashir A Stegle O Devine SE Lee C Eichler EE Korbel JO An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes Nature 2015 526 7571 75 81 26432246 PMC4617611
  3. [3]Rausch T Jones DT Zapatka M Stutz AM Zichner T Weischenfeldt J Jager N Remke M Shih D Northcott PA Pfaff E Tica J Wang Q Massimi L Witt H Bender S Pleier S Cin H Hawkins C Beck C von Deimling A Hans V Brors B Eils R Scheurlen W Blake J Benes V Kulozik AE Witt O Martin D Zhang C Porat R Merino DM Wasserman J Jabado N Fontebasso A Bullinger L Rucker FG Dohner K Dohner H Koster J Molenaar JJ Versteeg R Kool M Tabori U Malkin D Korshunov A Taylor MD Lichter P Pfister SM Korbel JO Genome sequencing of pediatric medulloblastoma links catastrophic DNA rearrangements with TP53 mutations Cell 2012 148 1-2 59 71 22265402 PMC3332216
  4. [4]Beck TF Mullikin JC Biesecker LG Systematic Evaluation of Sanger Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing Variants Clin Chem 2016 62 4 647 54 26847218 PMC4878677
  5. [5]Danecek P Auton A Abecasis G Albers CA Banks E DePristo MA Handsaker RE Lunter G Marth GT Sherry ST McVean G Durbin R Durbin R Altshuler D Abecasis G Bentley D Chakravarti A Clark A De La Vega F Donnelly P Dunn M Flicek P Gabriel S Green E Gibbs R Knoppers B Lander E Lehrach H Mardis E Marth G The variant call format and VCFtools Bioinformatics 2011 27 15 2156 8 21653522 PMC3137218
  6. [7]Brinkman EK Chen T Amendola M van Steensel B Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition Nucleic Acids Res 2014 42 22 168 PMC4267669 25300484
  7. [8]Hill JT Demarest BL Bisgrove BW Su YC Smith M Yost HJ Poly peak parser: Method and software for identification of unknown indels using sanger sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products Dev Dyn 2014 243 12 1632 6 25160973 PMC4525701
  8. [9]Dehairs J Talebi A Cherifi Y Swinnen JV CRISP-ID: decoding CRISPR mediated indels by Sanger sequencing Sci Rep 2016 6 28973 27363488 PMC4929496
  9. [11]Carr IM Camm N Taylor GR Charlton R Ellard S Sheridan EG Markham AF Bonthron DT GeneScreen: a program for high-throughput mutation detection in DNA sequence electropherograms J Med Genet 2011 48 2 123 30 21037276
  10. [12]Weckx S Del-Favero J Rademakers R Claes L Cruts M De Jonghe P Van Broeckhoven C De Rijk P novoSNP, a novel computational tool for sequence variation discovery Genome Res 2005 15 3 436 42 15741513 PMC551570
  11. [13]Treves DS Review of three DNA analysis applications for use in the microbiology or genetics classroom J Microbiol Biol Educ 2010 11 2 186 7 23653728 PMC3577175
  12. [14]Staden R The Staden sequence analysis package Mol Biotechnol 1996 5 3 233 41 8837029
  13. [15]Gordon D Viewing and editing assembled sequences using Consed Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2003 Chapter 11 11 2 18428695
  14. [16]Gog S, Beller T, Moffat A, Petri M. From theory to practice: Plug and play with succinct data structures. In: 13th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms, (SEA 2014): 2014. p. 326–37.
  15. [17]Li H Handsaker B Wysoker A Fennell T Ruan J Homer N Marth G Abecasis G Durbin R The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools Bioinformatics 2009 25 16 2078 9 19505943 PMC2723002
  16. [18]Rausch T Fritz MH Korbel JO Benes V Alfred: Interactive multi-sample BAM alignment statistics, feature counting and feature annotation for long- and short-read sequencing Bioinformatics 2019 35 14 2489 2491 30520945 PMC6612896
  17. [19]Rausch T Koren S Denisov G Weese D Emde AK Doring A Reinert K A consistency-based consensus algorithm for de novo and reference-guided sequence assembly of short reads Bioinformatics 2009 25 9 1118 24 19269990 PMC2732307

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rausch, T., Fritz, M. H.-Y., Untergasser, A., & Benes, V.
Affiliations
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Rausch, Tobias
Venue
BMC Genomics
Published
2020-03-14
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
230-230
ISSN
1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011793052
Cited by
130
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Genomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
TRACY, Sanger sequencing, chromatogram alignment, variant calling
MeSH terms
Humans, Software, User-Computer Interface, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Computational Biology, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Web Browser

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review