Cited by 6Computational Drug Discovery MethodsDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Predicting substrates for orphan solute carrier proteins using multi-omics datasets

Open access
Zhang, Y., Newstead, S., Sarkies, P.·2025·BMC Genomics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Solute carriers (SLC) are integral membrane proteins responsible for transporting a wide variety of metabolites, signaling molecules and drugs across cellular membranes. Despite key roles in metabolism, signaling and pharmacology, around one third of SLC proteins are ‘orphans’ whose substrates are unknown. Experimental determination of SLC substrates is technically challenging, given the wide range of possible physiological candidates. Here, we develop a predictive algorithm to identify correlations between SLC expression levels and intracellular metabolite concentrations by leveraging existing cancer multi-omics datasets. Our predictions recovered known SLC-substrate pairs with high sensitivity and specificity compared to simulated random pairs. CRISPR-Cas9 dependency screen data and metabolic pathway adjacency data further improved the performance of our algorithm. In parallel, we combined drug sensitivity data with SLC expression profiles to predict new SLC-drug interactions. Together, we provide a novel bioinformatic pipeline to predict new substrate predictions for SLCs, offering new opportunities to de-orphanise SLCs with important implications for understanding their roles in health and disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12864-025-11330-5

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Newstead, S., & Sarkies, P.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Sarkies, P.
Venue
BMC Genomics
Published
2025-02-11
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
130-130
ISSN
1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407310748
Cited by
6
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Genomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oxford
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI-60)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
solute carrier proteins, substrate prediction, drug sensitivity, intracellular metabolite concentrations, membrane transporters
MeSH terms
Solute Carrier Proteins, Multiomics, Algorithms, Humans, Substrate Specificity, Computational Biology, Genomics, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review