Cited by 3Fungal and yeast genetics researchGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBiochemical and Molecular Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of NUDIX enzymes across fungi reveals previously unrecognized diversity

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: The NUDIX superfamily encompasses highly diverse enzymes involved in a plethora of biological functions such as mRNA metabolism, DNA repair, and lipid peroxidation. These hydrolases are found in all domains of life and show surprising versatility in terms of the substrates that they process. The knowledge about the diversity of fungal NUDIX proteins is fragmentary, being largely limited to a small number of characterized enzymes from yeasts. To address this knowledge gap systematically, we performed a detailed analysis of the NUDIX hydrolases across 183 fungal proteomes. Results: Members of six of the known NUDIX families were present in fungi being particularly abundant in Glomeromycota. Phylogenetic analysis and sequence clustering grouped fungal NUDIX enzymes in 25 subfamilies, 13 of which did not cluster with previously known enzymes. These 13 newly identified subfamilies all belong to the canonical NUDIX family, and structural comparison revealed a typical NUDIX fold with α-β-α sandwich structure. Molecular docking suggested Ap3A and Ap4A as substrates with the highest binding affinity, but their possible cellular roles remain unclear. We also found evidence of expression of most of the genes that encode these enzymes, suggesting physiological relevance. Conclusions: Our analysis offers a comprehensive perspective on the structural and sequence relationships of the NUDIX superfamily across fungi with potential to guide experimental characterization of their biological functions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12864-025-11778-5

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Distribution of the six NUDIX families present in fungi across phyla. The phylogenomic tree of representative fungal isolates spanning the diversity of fungi calculated with Orthofinder was annotated with the distribution of six NUDIX Pfam families. The tree is rooted with the fruit fly D. melanogaster and the choanoflagellate M. brevicollis. The figure was prepared in iToL
Fig. 1 Distribution of the six NUDIX families present in fungi across phyla. The phylogenomic tree of representative fungal isolates spanning the diversity of fungi calculated with Orthofinder was annotated with the distribution of six NUDIX Pfam families. The tree is rooted with the fruit fly D. melanogaster and the choanoflagellate M. brevicollis. The figure was prepared in iToLCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Distribution of the six NUDIX families present in fungi across phyla for 183 proteomes (listed in Supplementary file S1, sheet S1). Box plots presenting the abundance of NUDIX families across fungal phyla are shown for phyla with more than 2 representatives. In the case of proteins from the canonical NUDIX family (PF00293), the scale of the boxplot goes up to 50, leaving out the Glomeromycota representative Gigaspora rosea, which has 101 NUDIX enzymes. All remaining boxplots are scaled between 0 and 4 which fits all the occurrences. The central box represents the interquartile range (IQR), which contains the middle 50% of the data, spanning from the first quartile (Q1) to the third quartile (Q3). A vertical line inside the box indicates the median (Q2). Lines called whiskers extend from the box to the smallest and largest data points within 1.5 times the IQR from Q1 and Q3. Any data points beyond this range are considered outliers and are shown as individual dots
Fig. 2 Distribution of the six NUDIX families present in fungi across phyla for 183 proteomes (listed in Supplementary file S1, sheet S1). Box plots presenting the abundance of NUDIX families across fungal phyla are shown for phyla with more than 2 representatives. In the case of proteins from the canonical NUDIX family (PF00293), the scale of the boxplot goes up to 50, leaving out the Glomeromycota representative Gigaspora rosea, which has 101 NUDIX enzymes. All remaining boxplots are scaled between 0 and 4 which fits all the occurrences. The central box represents the interquartile range (IQR), which contains the middle 50% of the data, spanning from the first quartile (Q1) to the third quartile (Q3). A vertical line inside the box indicates the median (Q2). Lines called whiskers extend from the box to the smallest and largest data points within 1.5 times the IQR from Q1 and Q3. Any data points beyond this range are considered outliers and are shown as individual dotsCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Clustering of fungal NUDIX sequences together with the reference set (human NUDIX sequences and PDB structures from all kingdoms representing the diversity of 10 Pfam NUDIX families). A The set of 2,801 fungal sequences identified as NUDIX hydrolases clustered by sequence similarity using CLANS. The fungal NUDIX proteins are depicted as grey nodes, reference sequences (human NUDIX proteins and PDB representatives from the ten NUDIX Pfam families) are highlighted in red. Reference sequences are marked with respective Pfam names on the Figure beside the canonical NUDIX family (PF00293) which represents the remaining enzymes. B Closeup of the clustering of proteins from the PF00293 where the newly identified subfamilies are marked by different colors as detailed in the figure legend
Fig. 3 Clustering of fungal NUDIX sequences together with the reference set (human NUDIX sequences and PDB structures from all kingdoms representing the diversity of 10 Pfam NUDIX families). A The set of 2,801 fungal sequences identified as NUDIX hydrolases clustered by sequence similarity using CLANS. The fungal NUDIX proteins are depicted as grey nodes, reference sequences (human NUDIX proteins and PDB representatives from the ten NUDIX Pfam families) are highlighted in red. Reference sequences are marked with respective Pfam names on the Figure beside the canonical NUDIX family (PF00293) which represents the remaining enzymes. B Closeup of the clustering of proteins from the PF00293 where the newly identified subfamilies are marked by different colors as detailed in the figure legendCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Proteins of the newly identified subfamilies within the canonical NUDIX family PF00293 show sequence diversity in the NUDIX domain and are widely distributed in the fungal kingdom. A Comparison of the NUDIX box motif between newly identified subfamilies, the position numbering is based on MutT protein from E. coli (UniProt: P08337) as reference. The cells in green indicate compatibility with the motif characteristic for the NUDIX superfamily, while the ones in orange show differences. The cells in white display the variable part of the motif. ‘U’ stands for bulky amino acid, while ‘x’ stands for any amino acid. B Distribution of NUDIX sequences of newly identified subfamilies in the phylogenomic tree of fungi. The tree is the same as in Fig. 1. Colored dots indicate the presence of proteins from a given subfamily in the genome of representative fungal species
Fig. 4 Proteins of the newly identified subfamilies within the canonical NUDIX family PF00293 show sequence diversity in the NUDIX domain and are widely distributed in the fungal kingdom. A Comparison of the NUDIX box motif between newly identified subfamilies, the position numbering is based on MutT protein from E. coli (UniProt: P08337) as reference. The cells in green indicate compatibility with the motif characteristic for the NUDIX superfamily, while the ones in orange show differences. The cells in white display the variable part of the motif. ‘U’ stands for bulky amino acid, while ‘x’ stands for any amino acid. B Distribution of NUDIX sequences of newly identified subfamilies in the phylogenomic tree of fungi. The tree is the same as in Fig. 1. Colored dots indicate the presence of proteins from a given subfamily in the genome of representative fungal speciesCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees of selected sequences representing the novel fungal NUDIX clusters along with the NUDIX hydrolases from H. sapiens (tip labels with prefix ‘human’), and M. musculus (tip labels with suffix mouse). Some of the fungal subfamilies are closely related and in such cases they are on the same tree. Fungal sequences are named with the capital letter of the NUDIX subfamily they belong to, followed by the NCBI protein accession and the species name. Bootstrap values for branches are showcased in rectangular boxes
Fig. 5 Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees of selected sequences representing the novel fungal NUDIX clusters along with the NUDIX hydrolases from H. sapiens (tip labels with prefix ‘human’), and M. musculus (tip labels with suffix mouse). Some of the fungal subfamilies are closely related and in such cases they are on the same tree. Fungal sequences are named with the capital letter of the NUDIX subfamily they belong to, followed by the NCBI protein accession and the species name. Bootstrap values for branches are showcased in rectangular boxesCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 Molecular dockings show similarities in the binding affinities of the newly identified NUDIX fungal subfamilies. Molecular docking results for newly identified subfamilies against 12 substrates clustered by similarity between subfamilies. Results represent relative binding energy [kcal/mol] and are normalized by Z-scores with lower values indicating more favorable interactions as previously described [42]
Fig. 6 Molecular dockings show similarities in the binding affinities of the newly identified NUDIX fungal subfamilies. Molecular docking results for newly identified subfamilies against 12 substrates clustered by similarity between subfamilies. Results represent relative binding energy [kcal/mol] and are normalized by Z-scores with lower values indicating more favorable interactions as previously described [42]CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 Predicted NUDIX enzymes, including those from newly identified subfamilies, are expressed across fungi. Evidence of gene expression for NUDIX families and the newly identified subfamilies in available transcriptomic datasets. Squares are only shown if the family/subfamily is present in the given taxa and they are filled if there is evidence of expression. Subfamily F is not present in the available transcriptomes
Fig. 7 Predicted NUDIX enzymes, including those from newly identified subfamilies, are expressed across fungi. Evidence of gene expression for NUDIX families and the newly identified subfamilies in available transcriptomic datasets. Squares are only shown if the family/subfamily is present in the given taxa and they are filled if there is evidence of expression. Subfamily F is not present in the available transcriptomesCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ. Jalview version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1189–91. · DOI
  2. Horton P, Park K-J, Obayashi T, Fujita N, Harada H, Adams-Collier CJ, et al. WoLF PSORT: protein localization predictor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(Web Server issue):W585. · DOI
  3. Kans J. Entrez direct: E-utilities on the Unix command line. Entrez programming utilities help. Bethesda: National Center for Biotechnology Information (US); 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK179288/.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Pasterny, Z., Barua, D., Mancera, E., & Muszewska, A.
Affiliations
  • Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL)
  • Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Corresponding author
Muszewska, Anna
Venue
BMC Genomics
Published
2025-07-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
606-606
ISSN
1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411905592
Cited by
2
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Genomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías (I0200/111/2024)
  • Narodowe Centrum Nauki (#2021/41/B/NZ2/02426)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Molecular Research
Keywords
Nudix hydrolase, fungal proteome, Glomeromycota, Ap3A, diadenosine tetraphosphate, enzyme substrate specificity, fungal gene expression
MeSH terms
Nudix Hydrolases, Fungal Proteins, Fungi, Multigene Family, Phylogeny, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review