Cited by 22Sleep and Work-Related FatigueHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlMind wandering and attention

Impact of brain arousal and time-on-task on autonomic nervous system activity in the wake-sleep transition

Open access
Huang, Jue, Ulke, Christine, Sander, Christian, Jawinski, Philippe, Spada, Janek, Hegerl, Ulrich, Hensch, Tilman·2018·BMC Neuroscience

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity has been shown to vary with the state of brain arousal. In a previous study, this association of ANS activity with distinct states of brain arousal was demonstrated using 15-min EEG data, but without directly controlling for possible time-on-task effects. In the current study we examine ANS-activity in fine-graded EEG-vigilance stages (indicating states of brain arousal) during two conditions of a 2-h oddball task while controlling for time-on-task. In addition, we analyze the effect of time-on-task on ANS-activity while holding the level of brain arousal constant. METHODS: Heart rate and skin conductance level of healthy participants were recorded during a 2-h EEG with eyes closed under simultaneous presentation of stimuli in an ignored (N = 39) and attended (N = 39) oddball condition. EEG-vigilance stages were classified using the Vigilance Algorithm Leipzig (VIGALL 2.1). The time-on-task effect was tested by dividing the EEG into four 30-min consecutive time blocks. ANS-activity was compared between EEG-vigilance stages across the entire 2 h and within each time block. RESULTS: We found a coherent decline of ANS-activity with declining brain arousal states, over the 2-h recording and in most cases within each 30-min block in both conditions. Furthermore, we found a significant time-on-task effect on heart rate, even when arousal was kept constant. It was most pronounced between the first and all subsequent blocks and could have been a consequence of postural change at the beginning of the experiment. CONCLUSION: Our findings contribute to the validation of VIGALL 2.1 using ANS parameters in 2-h EEG recording under oddball conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12868-018-0419-y

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Huang et al. (2018) found that a reduction of ANS activity (reflected in reduced mean HR and SCL over time) paralleled the decrease in vigilance and wakefulness before sleep onset.

    “Huang et al. (2018) instead focused on the period before sleep onset and found that a reduction of activity of the ANS (reflected in reduced mean HR and SCL over time) paralleled the decrease in vigilance and wakefulness before sleep onset, calculated through an EEG-based algorithm.”

    From Is autonomic nervous system function atypical in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)? A systematic review of the evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Huang et al. (2018)

    The Discussion reports that HR and SCL decreased across lower EEG-vigilance stages during the two-hour recording, supporting the claimed parallel decline. But it also reports no time-on-task effect on SCL and a numerical increase in SCL across time blocks. Thus, the claim that both measures fell over time overstates the findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Bente D Kranz H Heinrich K Vigilanz, dissoziative Vigilanzverschiebung und Insuffizienz des Vigilanztonus Begleitwirkungen und Misserfolge der psychiatrischen Pharmakotherapie 1964 Stuttgart Thieme

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, J., Ulke, C., Sander, C., Jawinski, P., Spada, J., Hegerl, U., & Hensch, T.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Stiftung Deutsche Depressionshilfe (DE)
Corresponding author
Huang, Jue
Venue
BMC Neuroscience
Published
2018-04-11
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
18-18
ISSN
1471-2202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803917681
Cited by
22
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Deutsche Bahn
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
autonomic nervous system activity, brain arousal, time-on-task effects, wake-sleep transition, heart rate, skin conductance level, oddball paradigm, sustained attention
MeSH terms
Autonomic Nervous System, Brain, Electroencephalography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Sleep, Time Factors, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review