Cited by 11Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationMobile Learning in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparing the effects of SMS-based education with group-based education and control group on diabetes management: a randomized educational program

Open access
Haghighinejad, Hourvash, Liaghat, Leila, Malekpour, Fatemeh, Jafari, Peyman, Taghipour, Kaveh, Rezaie, Mehrdad, Jooya, Parisa, Ghazipoor, Hamidreza, Ramzi, Mani·2022·BMC Primary Care

Abstract

Background: The high prevalence of diabetes and the importance of long-term follow-up of these patients encourage finding an inexpensive and applicable educational method to control the disease. Distance education based on mobile technology and Short message service (SMS) can be an effective way to manage this disease by eliminating time and place limitations. Due to the world’s high penetration rate, SMS is one of the best ways to transfer information and health education. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effect of SMS- and group-based education in managing diabetes type 2 and compare them with a control group. Method: A total of 168 patients with diabetes type 2 under the coverage of three family physician clinics were randomly allocated into three groups. The education was conducted in 12 one-hour sessions once a week in the group-based arm, and a daily short message was sent to the participants in the SMS group. The control group also underwent routine care at the family physician clinic. The duration of the education was 3 months. At baseline and 3 months later, fasting blood sugar (FBS), 2 hours postprandial sugar (2hppBS), and HBA1c, as well as diabetes self-management questionnaire score (DSMQ), were measured. Results: The comparison of the three groups in terms of changes in FBS (P-value: 0.001), 2hppBS (8 P-value: < 0.001) and HbA1c (P-value: < 0.001) were significantly different after 3 months. In pairwise analysis, 2hppBS was the only significantly different parameter between the group- and SMS-based education (P-value: 0.035). Conclusion: Although the effect of both educational methods via SMS or group education was better than the control group in controlling diabetes, these two methods were not statistically different. Due to spending a lot of time and money on group-based education, it is better to replace it with education by SMS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12875-022-01820-w

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Participants’ flow chart. DM: Diabetes Mellitus
Fig. 1 Participants’ flow chart. DM: Diabetes MellitusCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Naghibi SA, Asghari M, Rostami F. Investigation the effect of education on self-care promotion in type 2 diabetic patients in noor health centers in 2015. J Health Res Commun. 2015;1(2):22–8.
  2. Rakel RE. Textbook of family medicine e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007.
  3. Firooz M, Hosseini SJ, Mazlom SR, Hasan Zadeh F, Kimiyaee SA. Self-care of patient with diabetes type II. J Sabzevar Univ Med Sci. 2016;22(6):1018–25.
  4. Shirazi M, Anousheh M, Rajab A. The effect of self care program education through group discussion method on knowledge and practice in diabetic adolescent girls referring to Iranian Diabetes Society. Iran J Med Educ. 2011;10(5):982–93.
  5. Zalak K, Kazemi Haki B, Matlabi H. Obstacles to self-care from the viewpoint of TypeII diabetic patients and guidelines to remove them. Jorjani Biomed J. 2012;1:30–7.
  6. Rahnavard S, Elahi N, Rokhafroz D, Hagighi MH, Zakerkish M. Comparison of the effect of group based and mobile based education on self-care behaviors in type ii diabetic patients. Iran J Diabetes Metab. 2019;18(2):55–63.
  7. Firooz M, Mazloom SR, Kimiae SA, Hasanzadeh F. Comparing the effect of group education versus group counseling for self-care on glycated-hemoglobin in patients with diabetes type II. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2015;25(124):26–36.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Haghighinejad, H., Liaghat, L., Malekpour, F., Jafari, P., Taghipour, K., Rezaie, M., Jooya, P., Ghazipoor, H., & Ramzi, M.
Affiliations
  • Shiraz University (IR)
  • Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Haghighinejad, Hourvash
Venue
BMC Primary Care
Published
2022-08-19
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
209-209
ISSN
  • 1471-2296 (ISSN-L)
  • 2731-4553
OpenAlex
W4292332809
Cited by
11
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Family Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Vice-Chancellor for Research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (1396-01-01-16699)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-management education, mobile health, group education, glycemic control, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Random Allocation, Control Groups, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing the effects of SMS-based education with group-based education and control group on diabetes management: a randomized educational program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12875-022-01820-w
The paper
Haghighinejad, H., Liaghat, L., Malekpour, F., Jafari, P., Taghipour, K., Rezaie, M., Jooya, P., Ghazipoor, H., & Ramzi, M. (2022). Comparing the effects of SMS-based education with group-based education and control group on diabetes management: a randomized educational program. BMC Primary Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01820-w