The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale
Open accessAbstract
Background: Frailty is increasingly recognized as an important construct which has health implications for older adults. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a judgement-based frailty tool that evaluates specific domains including comorbidity, function, and cognition to generate a frailty score ranging from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill). The aim of this scoping review is to identify and document the nature and extent of research evidence related to the CFS. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search to identify original studies that used the Clinical Frailty Scale. Medline OVID, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched from January 2005 to March 2017. Articles were screened by two independent reviewers. Data extracted included publication date, setting, demographics, purpose of CFS assessment, and outcomes associated with CFS score. Results: Our search yielded 1688 articles of which 183 studies were included. Overall, 62% of studies were conducted after 2015 and 63% of the studies measured the CFS in hospitalized patients. The association of the CFS with an outcome was examined 526 times; CFS was predictive in 74% of the cases. Mortality was the most common outcome examined with CFS being predictive 87% of the time. CFS was associated with comorbidity 73% of the time, complications 100%, length of stay 75%, falls 71%, cognition 94%, and function 91%. The CFS was associated with other frailty scores 94% of the time. Conclusions: This scoping review revealed that the CFS has been widely used in multiple settings. The association of CFS score with clinical outcomes highlights its utility in the care of the aging population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clegg, A., Young, J., Iliffe, S., Rikkert, M. O., & Rockwood, K. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62167-9 · Cited by 9,503
Self-citationA global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people
Rockwood, K. (2005) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.050051 · Cited by 8,968
Self-citationFrailty Consensus: A Call to Action
Morley, J. E., Vellas, B., Abellan van Kan, G., Anker, S. D., Bauer, J. M., Bernabei, R., Cesari, M., Chumlea, W. C., Doehner, W., Evans, J., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.022 · Cited by 4,043
Self-citationUsing the Clinical Frailty Scale in Allocating Scarce Health Care Resources
Rockwood, K., & Theou, O. (2020) · Canadian Geriatrics Journal · doi:10.5770/cgj.23.463 · Cited by 894
Self-citationThe Identification of Frailty: A Systematic Literature Review
Sternberg, S. A., Schwartz, A. W., Karunananthan, S., Bergman, H., & Mark Clarfield, A. (2011) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03597.x · Cited by 703
Frailty in elderly people: an evolving concept.
Rockwood, K. J., Fox, R. A., Stolee, P., Robertson, D., & Beattie, B. L. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 609
Self-citationHe, W., Goodkind, D. M., & Kowal, P. (2016) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.1088.9362 · Cited by 342
Importance of frailty in patients with cardiovascular disease
Singh, M., Stewart, R., & White, H. (2014) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu197 · Cited by 323
What do we know about frailty in the acute care setting? A scoping review
Theou, O., Squires, E., Mallery, K., Lee, J. S., Fay, S., Goldstein, J., Armstrong, J. J., & Rockwood, K. (2018) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-018-0823-2 · Cited by 312
Self-citationFrailty in the face of COVID-19
Hubbard, R. E., Maier, A. B., Hilmer, S. N., Naganathan, V., Etherton‐Beer, C., & Rockwood, K. J. (2020) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afaa095 · Cited by 89
Self-citation
Cited by
Artificial intelligence-enhanced patient evaluation: bridging art and science
Oikonomou, E. K., & Khera, R. (2024) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae415 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Church, S., Rogers, E., Rockwood, K., & Theou, O.
- Venue
- BMC Geriatrics
- Published
- 2020-10-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 393-393
- ISSN
- 1471-2318 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3092057453
- Cited by
- 852
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 42.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12877-020-01801-7
- The paper
- Church, S., Rogers, E., Rockwood, K., & Theou, O. (2020). A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale. BMC Geriatrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01801-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.