Cited by 703Frailty in Older AdultsNutrition and Health in AgingPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

The Identification of Frailty: A Systematic Literature Review

Sternberg, Shelley A., Schwartz, Andrea Wershof, Karunananthan, Sathya, Bergman, Howard, Mark Clarfield, A.·2011·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

An operational definition of frailty is important for clinical care, research, and policy planning. The literature on the clinical definitions, screening tools, and severity measures of frailty were systematically reviewed as part of the Canadian Initiative on Frailty and Aging. Searches of MEDLINE from 1997 to 2009 were conducted, and reference lists of retrieved articles were pearled, to identify articles published in English and French on the identification of frailty in community‐dwelling people aged 65 and older. Two independent reviewers extracted descriptive information on study populations, frailty criteria, and outcomes from the selected papers, and quality rankings were assigned. Of 4,334 articles retrieved from the searches and 70 articles retrieved from the pearling, 22 met study inclusion criteria. In the 22 articles, physical function, gait speed, and cognition were the most commonly used identifying components of frailty, and death, disability, and institutionalization were common outcomes. The prevalence of frailty ranged from 5% to 58%. Despite significant work over the past decade, a clear consensus definition of frailty does not emerge from the literature. The definition and outcomes that best suit the unique needs of the researchers, clinicians, or policy‐makers conducting the screening determine the choice of a screening tool for frailty. Important areas for further research include whether disability should be considered a component or an outcome of frailty. In addition, the role of cognitive and mood elements in the frailty construct requires further clarification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03597.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Frail Elderly Functional Questionnaire (19 items) was identified as a potential outcome measure for frailty intervention studies because it is suitable for telephone or proxy use, valid and reliable, and sensitive to change.

    “The Frail Elderly Functional Questionnaire (19 items) was identified as a potential outcome measure for frailty intervention studies as it is suitable for use by telephone or proxy, valid and reliable (100), and is sensitive to change (101).”

    From Frailty in elderly people (2013) · cites this paper as [100]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sternberg, S. A., Schwartz, A. W., Karunananthan, S., Bergman, H., & Mark Clarfield, A.
Affiliations
  • Maccabi Healthcare Services (IL)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
  • Division of Geriatric Medicine McGill University Sir Mortimer B. Davis—Jewish General Hospital Montreal Canada
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-21
Volume
59
Issue
11
Pages
2129-2138
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2030265211
Cited by
703
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 26
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Max Bell Foundation
  • Réseau québécois de recherche sur le vieillissement
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
frailty, frailty identification, frailty screening tools, frailty definition, community-dwelling older adults, physical function, walking speed, cognition, disability, institutionalization, mortality, frailty prevalence
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Humans, Geriatric Assessment, Frail Elderly, Consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review