Cited by 42Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

A qualitative exploratory interview study on birth companion support actions for women during childbirth

Open access
Wanyenze, Eva Wodeya, Byamugisha, Josaphat K., Tumwesigye, Nazarius Mboona, Muwanguzi, Patience A., Nalwadda, Gorrette K.·2022·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends that women are supported continuously throughout labor by a companion of their choice. And, that companions have clearly designated roles and responsibilities to ensure that their presence is beneficial to both the woman and her health care providers. Presently, there is lack of strong evidence regarding specific support actions in relation to women's needs of care. Thus, we aimed to explore birth companion support actions for women during childbirth. METHODS: This was an exploratory descriptive qualitative study conducted between August 2019 and December 2019; at a referral hospital in the Eastern part of Uganda. Ten women were purposively selected: those who were admitted in early labor, expecting a normal delivery, and had fulltime birth companion. Nonparticipant direct observation and in-depth interviews were used to collect data. Latent content analysis was used. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: "Support actions aiding a good childbirth experience", "Support actions hindering coping with labor", and "Women's needs and expectations of care". Support actions aiding a good experience described were; emotional presence, motivation, providing nourishments, messenger activities, body massage for pain relief, assisting in ambulation and coaching. Companion fearful behaviors and disrespectful care in form of unacknowledged needs and hostility from birth companions were reported to hinder coping. The women desired thoughtful communication, trust, for birth companions to anticipate their needs and recognize non perceptive phases of labor to allow them focus on themselves. CONCLUSION: Birth companions from this study largely supported women emotionally, and attended to their physical needs. The greater part of support actions provided were esteemed by the women. Presence of birth companion will be of benefit when individual needs of women are put into consideration. Also, more guidance for birth companions is necessary to boost their role and mitigate shortcomings of their presence during childbirth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12884-022-04398-4

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [3]Organization WH WHO recommendations on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: World Health Organization 2018 30070803
  2. [8]WHO WHO recommendations on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: World Health Organization 2018 30070803
  3. [16]Polit DF Beck CT Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2008
  4. [33]Alden KR Lowdermilk DL Cashion MC Perry SE Maternity and Women's Health Care-E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences 2013
  5. [36]Folkman S Stress: appraisal and coping. Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine 2013 N Y Springer

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wanyenze, E. W., Byamugisha, J. K., Tumwesigye, N. M., Muwanguzi, P. A., & Nalwadda, G. K.
Affiliations
  • Mbarara University of Science and Technology (UG)
  • Makerere University (UG)
Corresponding author
Wanyenze, Eva Wodeya
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2022-01-22
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
63-63
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206898847
Cited by
42
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
birth companions, childbirth support, emotional presence, respectful care, trust in care, childbirth experience
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Labor, Obstetric, Pregnancy, Quality of Health Care, Uganda, Caregivers, Friends, Qualitative Research, Parturition, Delivery, Obstetric, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review