Cited by 8Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthMental Health and Patient InvolvementReproductive Health and Technologies

Interest in peer support persons among patients experiencing early pregnancy loss

Open access
Conroy, Carmen, Jain, Tanya, Mody, Sheila K.·2023·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding the type of support patients need when experiencing early pregnancy loss (EPL). The objective of this study is to explore how patients emotionally cope with EPL and to assess if there is interest in a peer EPL support program with a self-compassion component. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients who experienced EPL in the past two years. We evaluated the kinds of support that patients felt were most helpful, interest in a possible peer EPL support person, and suggestions for the creation of such a program. Content analysis was utilized to analyze the data and identify themes. RESULTS: Twenty-one individuals participated in the study. Approximately 52.3% (n = 11) of interviewees reported expectant management of their EPL, 23.8% (n = 5) reported medication management, and 23.8% (n = 5) reported undergoing dilation and curettage. We identified five themes: (1) therapy and in-person support groups are helpful when experiencing EPL, but are sometimes inaccessible; (2) social media support groups are initially advantageous for creating a sense of solidarity, but in the long term can be triggering; (3) support from a peer who has also experienced EPL is uniquely valuable; (4) developing self-compassion is important in emotionally coping with EPL; and (5) there is a demand for emotional and informational support following EPL. CONCLUSIONS: Given the unique support participants identified receiving from a peer with shared lived experience, there is interest in a peer EPL support program with a self-compassion component for emotional and informational support following EPL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12884-023-05816-x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One method of coping with grief after stillbirth is to attend support groups and/or connect with peer-to-peer support to find community through a shared experience and validate parenthood.

    “One method of coping with grief after stillbirth is to attend support groups and/or connect with peer-to-peer support to find community through a shared experience and validate parenthood (3, 21, 31).”

    From Parent-to-parent advice before the birth of a stillborn baby (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results > Themes and Discussion (pages not provided) describe support groups and peers with shared experience as sources of comfort and connection after early pregnancy loss. The study does not establish this for stillbirth specifically, and the passages do not say that peer support validates parenthood. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conroy, C., Jain, T., & Mody, S. K.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Mody, Sheila K.
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2023-07-11
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
506-506
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383877168
Cited by
8
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
early pregnancy loss, peer support, self-compassion, emotional coping, support groups, social media support, expectant management, dilatation and curettage, patient needs, information support
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adaptation, Psychological, Curettage, Emotions, Female, Humans, Peer Group, Pregnancy, Self-Help Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review