CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 51Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentReliability and Agreement in MeasurementPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnostic validity of the MINI-KID disorder classifications in specialized child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient clinics in Sweden

Open access
Högberg, Camilla, Billstedt, Eva, Björck, Caroline, Björck, Per-Olof, Ehlers, Stephan, Gustle, Lars-Henry, Hellner, Clara, Höök, Henrik, Serlachius, Eva, Svensson, Mats A., Larsson, Jan-Olov·2019·BMC Psychiatry
DOI 10.1186/s12888-019-2121-8PMC PMC6507232
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Missing diagnostic information often results poor accuracy of the clinical diagnostic decision process. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID) is a short standardized diagnostic interview and covers a rather broad range of diagnoses applicable to children and adolescents. MINI-KID disorder classifications have shown test-retest reliability and validity comparable to other standardized diagnostic interviews and is claimed to be a useful tool for diagnostic screening in Child and Adolescent Psychiatric care. The concordance between the Swedish language version of the MINI-KID Interview and LEAD (Longitudinal, Expert, All Data) research diagnoses was studied in secondary child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient care. METHODS: MINI-KID interviews were performed for 101 patients, boys n = 50, girls n = 51, aged 4 to 18 years. The duration of the interview was on average 46 min, the child/adolescent participating together with the parent(s) in most cases. The seven most prevalent diagnoses were included in the analyses. RESULTS: The average overall percent agreement (OPA) between MINI-KID and LEAD was 79.5%, the average percent positive agreement (PPA) 35.4 and the average percent negative agreement (NPA) 92.7. OPA was highest for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) (0.89), Tic disorders (0.88) and Pervasive developmental disorders (0.81). There were similar results in diagnostic agreement comparing the two versions: the standard MINI-KID and MINI-KID for parents. The specific screening questions in MINI-KID resulted in additional preliminary diagnoses compared with the regular initial clinical assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was an acceptable agreement between MINI-KID disorder classifications and research diagnoses according to LEAD. The standardized interview MINI-KID could be considered as a tool with the possibility to give valuable information in the diagnostic process in child and adolescent care which is similar to the setting in the present study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-019-2121-8

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Herlofson J. Mini-D 5 : diagnostiska kriterier enligt DSM-5. Stockholm: Pilgrim Press; 2014.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry and FDA staff: statistical guidance on reporting results from studies evaluating diagnostic tests. Silver Spring: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2007.
  3. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: release 15. College Station: StataCorp LLC; 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Högberg, C., Billstedt, E., Björck, C., Björck, P.-O., Ehlers, S., Gustle, L.-H., Hellner, C., Höök, H., Serlachius, E., Svensson, M. A., & Larsson, J.-O.
Affiliations
  • Region Stockholm (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Region Skåne (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Larsson, Jan-Olov
ORCID
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-05-09
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
142-142
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s12888-019-2121-8
PMC
PMC6507232
OpenAlex
W2944557964
Cited by
51
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
MINI-KID, diagnostic validity, diagnostic agreement, child and adolescent psychiatry, outpatient psychiatric care, obsessive-compulsive disorder, tic disorders, pervasive developmental disorders, diagnostic screening
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Humans, Male, Medicine, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Parents, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sweden, Reproducibility of Results, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review