CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors influencing awareness of healthcare providers on maternal sepsis: a mixed-methods approach

Brizuela, Vanessa, Bonet, Mercedes, Souza, João Paulo, Tunçalp, Özge, Viswanath, Kasisomayajula, Langer, Ana·2019·BMC Public Health
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-6920-0PMC PMC6547516
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-019-6920-0

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Barriers to making correct and timely decisions as reported by respondents (N = 1555). Question allowed for selecting up to two response options
Fig. 1 Barriers to making correct and timely decisions as reported by respondents (N = 1555). Question allowed for selecting up to two response optionsCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. The Global Maternal and Neonatal Sepsis Initiative: a call for collaboration and action by 2030. Lancet Glob Health. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30020-7 . · DOI
  2. Bonet M, Souza JP, Abalos E, Fawole B, Knight M, Kouanda S, et al. The global maternal sepsis study and awareness campaign (GLOSS): study protocol. Reprod Health. 2018;15:16. · DOI
  3. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
  4. Pittet D, Mourouga P, Perneger TV. Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:126–30. · DOI
  5. Karimi-Sari H, Tajik M, Bayatpoor ME, Sharafi H, Alavian SM. Public awareness campaign and knowledge of Iranian (bio) medical students regarding hepatitis B and C infections. Hepat Mon. 2017;17. https://doi.org/10.5812/hepatmon.45929 . · DOI
  6. Al-Dorzi HM, Cherfan A, Al-Harbi S, Al-Askar A, Al-Azzam S, Hroub A, et al. Knowledge of thromboprophylaxis guidelines pre- and post-didactic lectures during a venous thromboembolism awareness day at a tertiary-care hospital. Ann Thorac Med. 2013;8:165–9. · DOI
  7. Randolph W, Viswanath K. Lessons learned from public health mass media campaigns: marketing health in a crowded media world. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:419–37. · DOI
  8. Christiano A, Neimand A. Stop raising awareness already. Stanford Social Innovation Review: Spring; 2017. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/stop_raising_awareness_already . Accessed 10 Feb 2018
  9. Purtle J, Roman LA. Health awareness days: sufficient evidence to support the craze? Am J Public Health. 2015;105:1061–5. · DOI
  10. DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Fairhurst SK, Velicer WF, Velasquez MM, Rossi JS. The process of smoking cessation: an analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59:295–304. · DOI
  11. Dyar OJ, Hills H, Seitz L-T, Perry A, Ashiru-Oredope D. Assessing the knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of human and animal health students towards antibiotic use and resistance: a pilot cross-sectional study in the UK. Antibiotics. 2018;7:10. · DOI
  12. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Fishbein M, Yzer MC. Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Commun Theory. 2003;13:164–83. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Mack N, Woodsong C. Qualitative research methods: a data collector’s field guide. Research Triangle Park: Family Health International; 2005.
  15. Galletta A. Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: from research design to analysis and publication. New York: NYU Press; 2013. · DOI
  16. Sue V, Ritter L. Conducting online surveys. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2012. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335186 . · DOI
  17. Gumucio S. Data collection: quantitative methods. The KAP survey model (knowledge, Attitude & Practices). Médecins du monde; 2011.
  18. Acosta CD, Knight M. Sepsis and maternal mortality. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;25:109–16. · DOI
  19. Aarvold ABR, Ryan HM, Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Fjell C, Walley KR. Multiple organ dysfunction score is superior to the obstetric-specific Sepsis in obstetrics score in predicting mortality in septic obstetric patients. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:e49–57. · DOI
  20. Meyrick J. What is good qualitative research?: a first step towards a comprehensive approach to judging rigour/quality. J Health Psychol. 2006;11:799–808. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Noble H, Smith J. Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs. 2015;18:34–5. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Marshall-Brown P, Namboya F, Pollach G. Evaluating sepsis training for medical students and nonphysicians in Malawi. J Clin Anesth. 2016;34:352–7. · DOI
  23. Palleschi MT, Sirianni S, O’Connor N, Dunn D, Hasenau SM. An Interprofessional process to improve early identification and treatment for Sepsis. J Healthc Qual. 2014;36:23–31. · DOI
  24. van Dillen J, Zwart J, Schutte J, van Roosmalen J. Maternal sepsis: epidemiology, etiology and outcome. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2010;23:249–54. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–88. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Cho JY, Lee E-H. Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: similarities and differences. Qual Rep. 2014;19:1.
  27. Alaqeel A, Kamalmaz H, Abou Al-Shaar H, AlZahrani I, Alaqeel A, Aljetaily S, et al. Evaluating the initial impact of the Riyadh epilepsy awareness campaign. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;52:251–5. · DOI
  28. Biran A, Schmidt W-P, Wright R, Jones T, Seshadri M, Isaac P, et al. The effect of a soap promotion and hygiene education campaign on handwashing behaviour in rural India: a cluster randomised trial. Tropical Med Int Health. 2009;14:1303–14. · DOI
  29. Maulik PK, Devarapalli S, Kallakuri S, Tewari A, Chilappagari S, Koschorke M, et al. Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India: a mixed methods approach. Psychol Med. 2017;47:565–75. · DOI
  30. WHO. Improving the prevention, diagnosis and management of sepsis. In: World health assembly; 2017.
  31. Chen Y-C, Chang S-C, Pu C, Tang G-J. The impact of Nationwide education program on clinical practice in Sepsis care and mortality of severe Sepsis: a population-based study in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2013;8:e77414. · DOI
  32. Richards GA, Brink AJ, Messina AP, Feldman C, Swart K, van den Bergh D. Stepwise introduction of the ‘best care always’ central-line-associated bloodstream infection prevention bundle in a network of south African hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 2017;97:86–92. · DOI
  33. Islam Z, Sanin KI, Ahmed T. Improving case detection of tuberculosis among children in Bangladesh: lessons learned through an implementation research. BMC Public Health. 2017;17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4062-9 . · DOI
  34. Vallone D, Cantrell J, Bennett M, Smith A, Rath JM, Xiao H, et al. Evidence of the impact of the truth FinishIt campaign. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20:543–51. · DOI
  35. Kim JE, Lee YB, Lee JH, Kim HS, Lee KH, Park YM, et al. Disease awareness and management behavior of patients with atopic dermatitis: a questionnaire survey of 313 patients. Ann Dermatol. 2015;27:40. · DOI
  36. Leslie TE, Carson M, van CE, Klein KD, Braks M, Krumeich A. An analysis of community perceptions of mosquito-borne disease control and prevention in Sint Eustatius, Caribbean Netherlands. Glob Health Action. 2017;10:1350394. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brizuela, V., Bonet, M., Souza, J. P., Tunçalp, Ö., Viswanath, K., & Langer, A.
ORCID
Brizuela, Vanessa
Venue
BMC Public Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-06-03
Volume
19
Issue
1
ISSN
1471-2458
DOI
10.1186/s12889-019-6920-0
PMC
PMC6547516
Cited by
10
References
2
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Merck Sharp and Dohme
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • Health Resources and Services Administration (T76MC00001)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review