Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Burnout among Portuguese healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Duarte, Ivone, Teixeira, Andreia, Castro, Luísa, Marina, Sílvia, Ribeiro, Carla, Jácome, Cristina, Martins, Vera, Ribeiro-Vaz, Inês, Pinheiro, Hugo Celso, Silva, Andreia Rodrigues, Ricou, Miguel, Sousa, Bruno, Alves, Cristiana, Oliveira, Andreia, Silva, Paula, Nunes, Rui, Serrão, Carla·2020·BMC Public Health
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-09980-z
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: During COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) have had high workload and have been exposed to multiple psychosocial stressors. The aim of this study was to evaluate HCWs in terms of the relative contributions of socio-demographic and mental health variables on three burnout dimensions: personal, work-related, and client-related burnout. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed using an online questionnaire spread via social networks. A snowball technique supported by health care institutions and professional organizations was applied. Results: A total of 2008 subjects completed the survey. Gender, parental status, marriage status, and salary reduction were found to be significant factors for personal burnout. Health problems and direct contact with infected people were significantly associated with more susceptibility to high personal and work-related burnout. Frontline working positions were associated with all three dimensions. Higher levels of stress and depression in HCWs were significantly associated with increased levels of all burnout dimensions. Higher levels of satisfaction with life and resilience were significantly associated with lower levels of all burnout dimensions. Conclusions: All three burnout dimensions were associated with a specific set of covariates. Consideration of these three dimensions is important when designing future burnout prevention programs for HCWs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-020-09980-z

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Duarte, I., Teixeira, A., Castro, L., Marina, S., Ribeiro, C., Jácome, C., Martins, V., Ribeiro-Vaz, I., Pinheiro, H. C., Silva, A. R., Ricou, M., Sousa, B., Alves, C., Oliveira, A., Silva, P., Nunes, R., & Serrão, C.
Venue
BMC Public Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-12
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
1885-1885
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s12889-020-09980-z
OpenAlex
W3110740995
Cited by
259
References
50
FWCI
18.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Burnout among Portuguese healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12889-020-09980-z
The paper
Duarte, I., Teixeira, A., Castro, L., Marina, S., Ribeiro, C., Jácome, C., Martins, V., Ribeiro-Vaz, I., Pinheiro, H. C., Silva, A. R., Ricou, M., Sousa, B., Alves, C., Oliveira, A., Silva, P., Nunes, R., & Serrão, C. (2020). Burnout among Portuguese healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09980-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.