Cited by 20Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPhysical Activity and HealthHealth and Lifestyle Studies

Designing and evaluation of E-health educational intervention on students' physical activity: an application of Pender's Health Promotion Model

Open access
Sabooteh, Sahar, Feizi, Awat, Shekarchizadeh, Parivash, Shahnazi, Hossein, Mostafavi, Firoozeh·2021·BMC Public Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to design and evaluate the software and web-based curriculum based on Pender Model in order to promote students' physical activity. METHODS: This is a quasi-experimental study conducted on 225 eligible students who were randomly divided into two groups of web and software-based intervention and control. The sample size of the study was selected using stratified sampling method. The evaluation was done with pre-test and post-test and follow-up, which were performed immediately two and six months following the intervention. The data were analyzed employing statistical software SPSS using descriptive statistics, chi-square, one way ANOVA, and repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: The obtained results revealed that the level of physical activity after the intervention in the web and software groups significantly increased compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Moreover, the mean score of Pender model constructs, immediately two and six months after the intervention, was significantly different in the web and software groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that, providing tailored message based on health promotion model's constructs has a positive effect on promoting physical activity of students. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Name: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials. Registration number: IRCT20181009041298N1 . Registration date: 2018-12-02 [retrospectively registered].

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-021-10641-y

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pender's Health Promotion Model has been recognized as suitable for eliciting health promotion from nursing recipients based on previous studies.

    “The model has been recognized as suitable for eliciting health promotion from nursing recipients based on previous studies of patients with chronic diseases [14,20,22], middle and high school students and college students [15,20,22], pregnant women and women of childbearing age, and general adults and workers [20,22,23].”

    From Factors Associated With Health-promoting Behaviors Among Nurses in South Korea: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Based on Pender's Health Promotion Model. (2024) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Background describes Pender’s model as a framework for promoting health behaviors, and the Abstract Conclusion reports improved physical activity among university students. The paper supports its suitability for that student setting, but does not establish suitability for nursing recipients across the other populations named in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sabooteh, S., Feizi, A., Shekarchizadeh, P., Shahnazi, H., & Mostafavi, F.
Affiliations
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Mostafavi, Firoozeh
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2021-04-06
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
657-657
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3114852530
Cited by
20
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (396578)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
Keywords
digital health interventions, physical activity promotion, Pender's health promotion model, university students, web-based educational intervention, tailored health messages, health behavior change
MeSH terms
Health Promotion, Humans, Iran, Students, Exercise, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review