The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inside the ‘imperfect mosaic’: Minority ethnic women’s qualitative experiences of race and ethnicity during pregnancy, childbirth, and maternity care in the United Kingdom
Abstract
Background: Persistent, high rates of maternal mortality amongst ethnic minorities is one of the UK’s starkest examples of racial disparity. With greater risks of adverse outcomes during maternity care, ethnic minority women are subjected to embedded, structural and systemic discrimination throughout the healthcare service. Methods: Fourteen semi-structured interviews were undertaken with minority ethnic women who had recent experience of UK maternity care. Data pertaining to ethnicity and race were subject to iterative, inductive coding, and constant comparison through Grounded Theory Analysis to test a previously established theory: The ‘Imperfect Mosaic’. Analysis & findings: A related theory emerged, comprising four themes: ‘Stopping Short of Agentic Birth’; ‘Silenced and Stigmatised through Tick-Box Care’; ‘Anticipating Discrimination and the Need for Advocacy’; and ‘Navigating Cultural Differences’. The new theory: Inside the ‘Imperfect Mosaic’, demonstrates experiences of those who received maternity care which directly mirrors experiences of those who provide care, as seen in the previous theory we set-out to test. However, the current theory is based on more traditional and familiar notions of racial discrimination, rather than the nuanced, subtleties of socio-demographic-based micro-aggressions experienced by healthcare professionals. Conclusions: Our findings suggest the need for the following actions: Prioritisation of bodily autonomy and agency in perinatal physical and mental healthcare; expand awareness of social and cultural issues (i.e., moral injury; cultural safety) within the NHS; and undertake diversity training and support, and follow-up of translation of the training into practice, across (maternal) health services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the context of the current study, this fi nding is surprising, given the vast body of evidence exploring this notion [17,19-21,23,44-50].”
From The birth trauma earthquake: A qualitative investigation of first-time mothers who perceived their birth as traumatic (2026) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“It is widely accepted that experiences of overt discrimination perpetuate the perception of birth trauma in these women, and this is particularly prevalent within UK-based literature [44,45].”
From The birth trauma earthquake: A qualitative investigation of first-time mothers who perceived their birth as traumatic (2026) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“The dominant discourse surrounding women from minority ethnic backgrounds and birth trauma is one of discrimination, fuelled by negative interactions with medical professionals and increased risk of experiencing childbirth as traumatic.”
From The birth trauma earthquake: A qualitative investigation of first-time mothers who perceived their birth as traumatic (2026) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x05279903 · Cited by 20,808
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf00988593 · Cited by 11,133
Morse, J. M. (2000) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973200129118183 · Cited by 3,215
Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7 · Cited by 3,115
Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406919874596 · Cited by 2,164
Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semi-Structured Interviews
McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015) · Global Qualitative Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/2333393615597674 · Cited by 832
Grounded Theory Method: Philosophical Perspectives, Paradigm of Inquiry, and Postmodernism
Annells, M. (1996) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239600600306 · Cited by 500
Philosophical Paradigms, Grounded Theory, and Perspectives on Emergence
Levers, M.-J. D. (2013) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244013517243 · Cited by 347
Cultural Competence or Cultural Humility? Moving Beyond the Debate
Greene‐Moton, E., & Minkler, M. (2019) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839919884912 · Cited by 260
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Knight M, Bunch K, Patel R, Shakespeare J, Kotnis R, Kenyon S, Kurinczuk JJ, editors. On behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving lives, improving mothers’ care. Core report: lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland confidential enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2018-20. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2022.
- Awe T, Abe C, Peter M, Wheeler R. The Black maternity experiences survey: a nationwide study of black women’s experiences of maternity services in the United Kingdom. London: Five X More; 2022.
- Birthrights. Systemic racism, not broken bodies. An inquiry into racial injustice and human rights in UK maternity care: executive summary. Coventry: Birthrights; 2022.
- Gohir S, Invisible. Maternity experiences of Muslim women from racialised minority communities. Birmingham: Muslim Women’s Network UK; 2022.
- Green L. Understanding the life course: sociological and psychological perspectives. 2nd ed. Polity Press; 2017.
- Glaser BG. The grounded theory perspective: conceptualization contrasted with description. Sociology Press; 2001.
- Kilby L, Staniforth L. Gendered Islamophobia in the UK media: The discursive construction of Jihadi brides. The British Psychological Society Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Annual Conference 2023: Windsor, United Kingdom.
- World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: Intrapartum Care for a positive Childbirth experience. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
Cited by
Silverio, S. A., George-Carey, R., Memtsa, M., Kent-Nye, F. E., Magee, L. A., Sheen, K. S., Burgess, K., Oza, M., Storey, C., Sandall, J., et al. (2024) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-024-06721-7 · Cited by 7
Bailey, E. C., Barry, Z., Buabeng, R., Fellows, R. E., Khazaezadeh, N., Rajasingam, D., Silverio, S. A., & Sheen, K. S. (2026) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2026.102171
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Silverio, S. A., Varman, N., Barry, Z., Khazaezadeh, N., Rajasingam, D., Magee, L. A., & Matthew, J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMC Public Health
- Published
- 2023-12-21
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1471-2458
- PMC
- PMC10734065
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 45
- Language
- en
- Licence
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (vor)
- Funders
- The College of Radiographers (CBRHvaCoRIPS197)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
![Fig. 1 Stacked Venn Diagram explaining degrees of violence against minority ethnic people N/B. Diagram draws influence from talk by Kilby & Staniforth [51]](/paper-figures/14e8433a9a4c4511a4d7696411b46d19/inside-the-imperfect-mosaic-minority-ethnic-womens-qualitative-experiences-of-figure-1.jpg)