Cited by 7COVID-19 Impact on ReproductionGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Preliminary findings on the experiences of care for women who suffered early pregnancy losses during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study

Open access
Silverio, Sergio A., George-Carey, Rhiannon, Memtsa, Maria, Kent-Nye, Flora E., Magee, Laura A., Sheen, Kayleigh S., Burgess, Karen, Oza, Munira +11 more·2024·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women who suffer an early pregnancy loss require specific clinical care, aftercare, and ongoing support. In the UK, the clinical management of early pregnancy complications, including loss is provided mainly through specialist Early Pregnancy Assessment Units. The COVID-19 pandemic fundamentally changed the way in which maternity and gynaecological care was delivered, as health systems moved to rapidly reconfigure and re-organise services, aiming to reduce the risk and spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection. PUDDLES is an international collaboration investigating the pandemic's impact on care for people who suffered a perinatal bereavement. Presented here are initial qualitative findings undertaken with UK-based women who suffered early pregnancy losses during the pandemic, about how they navigated the healthcare system and its restrictions, and how they were supported. METHODS: In-keeping with a qualitative research design, in-depth semi-structured interviews were undertaken with an opportunity sample of women (N = 32) who suffered any early pregnancy loss during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were analysed using a template analysis to understand women's access to services, care, and networks of support, during the pandemic following their pregnancy loss. The thematic template was based on findings from parents who had suffered a late-miscarriage, stillbirth, or neonatal death in the UK, during the pandemic. RESULTS: All women had experienced reconfigured maternity and early pregnancy services. Data supported themes of: 1) COVID-19 Restrictions as Impractical & Impersonal; 2) Alone, with Only Staff to Support Them; 3) Reduction in Service Provision Leading to Perceived Devaluation in Care; and 4) Seeking Their Own Support. Results suggest access to early pregnancy loss services was reduced and pandemic-related restrictions were often impractical (i.e., restrictions added to burden of accessing or receiving care). Women often reported being isolated and, concerningly, aspects of early pregnancy loss services were reported as sub-optimal. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide important insight for the recovery and rebuilding of health services in the post-pandemic period and help us prepare for providing a higher standard of care in the future and through any other health system shocks. Conclusions made can inform future policy and planning to ensure best possible support for women who experience early pregnancy loss.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12884-024-06721-7

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Major changes in healthcare services, such as cancellation of appointments and exams, and restrictions on contact with the baby after death, further intensified women's suffering during the pandemic.

    “Major changes in healthcare services, such as the cancellation of appointments and exams (56), and restrictions on contact with the baby after death, further intensified women’s suffering during this period (57, 58).”

    From Experiences and long-term repercussions of perinatal grief in women after perinatal bereavement: a meta-ethnography (2025) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Results (‘Impracticality of COVID-19 restrictions’; page unavailable) report that pandemic restrictions made care after early pregnancy loss more emotionally difficult. The paper discusses separation from partners and support networks, but does not report restrictions on contact with a baby after death. Cancellation of appointments and exams is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]Silverio SA. A lifecourse analysis approach to pregnancy loss & perinatal bereavement: Ruptures as sites of empirical inquiry. Surrey (virtual): The Society for Reproductive & Infant Psychology annual conference; 2022.
  2. [8]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE guideline [NG126]. Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: Diagnosis and initial management. NICE. 2021. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng126. 35267247
  3. [42]Bhaskar R. Dialectical critical realism and ethics. In: Archer M, Bhaskar R, Collier A, Lawson T, Norrie A, editors. Critical realism: essential readings. London: Routledge; 1998. p. 641–687.
  4. [66]Voss P, Schick M, Langer L, Ainsworth A, Ditzen B, Strowitzki T, Wischmann T, Kuon RJ. Recurrent pregnancy loss: a shared stressor–-couple-orientated psychological research findings. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(6):1288–96. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1421. 33039130 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1421 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silverio, S. A., George-Carey, R., Memtsa, M., Kent-Nye, F. E., Magee, L. A., Sheen, K. S., Burgess, K., Oza, M., Storey, C., Sandall, J., The PUDDLES UK Collaboration, Sampson, A., Haddad, L., Payne, E., Sambrook, L., Goodhart, V., Easter, A., von Dadelszen, P., & Jurković, D.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
  • The Ectopic Pregnancy Trust (GB)
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Silverio, Sergio A.
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2024-08-09
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
522-522
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401463312
Cited by
7
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR‐INF‐2170)
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • King's College London
  • National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR-INF-2170)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
early pregnancy loss, miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, perinatal bereavement, COVID-19 pandemic, health care access, women's experiences of care, social isolation, social support networks
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Bereavement, Female, United Kingdom, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Pregnancy, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review