The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Barriers and facilitators to health technology adoption by older adults with chronic diseases: an integrative systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Background: In recent years, healthcare systems have progressively adopted several technologies enhancing access to healthcare for older adults and support the delivery of efficient and effective care for this specific population. These technologies include both assistive technologies designed to maintain or improve the independence, social participation and functionality of older people at home, as well as health information technology developed to manage long-term conditions. Examples of such technologies include telehealth, wearable devices and mobile health. However, despite the great promise that health technology holds for promoting independent living among older people, its actual implementation remains challenging. Methods: This study aimed to conduct an integrative systematic review of the research evidence on the factors that facilitate or hinder the adoption of different types of technology by older individuals with chronic diseases. For this purpose, four electronic databases (PsycArticles, Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed) were queried to search for indexed published studies. The methodological quality of the selected papers has been assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results: Twenty-nine articles were selected, including 6.213 adults aged 60 or older. The studies have been synthesised considering the types of technological interventions and chronic diseases, as well as the main barriers and facilitators in technology acceptance. The results revealed that the majority of the selected articles focused on comorbid conditions and the utilisation of telemedicine tools. With regard to hindering and facilitating factors, five main domains were identified: demographic and socioeconomic, health-related, dispositional, technology-related and social factors. Conclusion: The study results have practical implications not only for technology developers but also for all the social actors involved in the design and implementation of healthcare technologies, including formal and informal caregivers and policy stakeholders. These actors could use this work to enhance their understanding of the utilisation of technology by the ageing population. This review emphasises the factors that facilitate technology adoption and identifies barriers that impede it, with the ultimate goal of promoting health and independent living.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
The integrative review: updated methodology
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x · Cited by 10,241
Wang, H., Naghavi, M., Allen, C., Barber, R. M., Bhutta, Z. A., Carter, A., Casey, D. C., Charlson, F. J., Chen, A. Z., Coates, M. M., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31012-1 · Cited by 6,596
Governmentality: power and rule in modern society
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-6521 · Cited by 6,205
The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers
Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., et al. (2018) · Education for Information · doi:10.3233/efi-180221 · Cited by 4,737 · cited 1×
“The methodological quality of the selected records has been assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) [57].”
MethodChoi, N. G., & DiNitto, D. M. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2645 · Cited by 871
Prevalence of Multiple Chronic Conditions Among US Adults, 2018
Boersma, P., Black, L. I., & Ward, B. W. (2020) · Preventing Chronic Disease · doi:10.5888/pcd17.200130 · Cited by 702
Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review
Wilson, J., Heinsch, M., Betts, D., Booth, D., & Kay-Lambkin, F. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11623-w · Cited by 698
Consequences of chronic diseases and other limitations associated with old age – a scoping review
Maresova, P., Javanmardi, E., Barakovic, S., Barakovic Husic, J., Tomsone, S., Krejcar, O., & Kuca, K. (2019) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7762-5 · Cited by 684
Cited by
The experiences of daily smartphone use among older adults in Brazil: A grounded theory analysis
Gallo, A. M., Laranjeira, C., Araújo, J. P., Marques, F. R. D. M., Baccon, W. C., Salci, M. A., & Carreira, L. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35120 · Cited by 11
Perspectives of Older Adults on Assistive Technology: Qualitative Study
Jaana, M., Lévesque Ryan, M., Tamim, H., Riachy, E., & Paré, G. (2025) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/74214 · Cited by 6
Public opinion on types of voice systems for older adults
Qu, N. Z., Li, J., Kongmanee, J., & Chignell, M. (2024) · Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering · doi:10.1177/20556683241287414 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertolazzi, A., Quaglia, V., & Bongelli, R.
- Venue
- BMC Public Health
- Published
- 2024-02-16
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 506-506
- ISSN
- 1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391886349
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 89
- FWCI
- 56.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Barriers and facilitators to health technology adoption by older adults with chronic diseases: an integrative systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12889-024-18036-5
- The paper
- Bertolazzi, A., Quaglia, V., & Bongelli, R. (2024). Barriers and facilitators to health technology adoption by older adults with chronic diseases: an integrative systematic review. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18036-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.