The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of clinical phenotypes in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of the literature
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) is a heterogeneous pathology characterized by a complex and multifactorial nature. It has been hypothesised that these differences are due to the existence of underlying phenotypes representing different mechanisms of the disease. METHODS: The aim of this study is to identify the current evidence for the existence of groups of variables which point towards the existence of distinct clinical phenotypes in the KOA population. A systematic literature search in PubMed was conducted. Only original articles were selected if they aimed to identify phenotypes of patients aged 18 years or older with KOA. The methodological quality of the studies was independently assessed by two reviewers and qualitative synthesis of the evidence was performed. Strong evidence for existence of specific phenotypes was considered present if the phenotype was supported by at least two high-quality studies. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies were included. Through qualitative synthesis of evidence, six main sets of variables proposing the existence of six phenotypes were identified: 1) chronic pain in which central mechanisms (e.g. central sensitisation) are prominent; 2) inflammatory (high levels of inflammatory biomarkers); 3) metabolic syndrome (high prevalence of obesity, diabetes and other metabolic disturbances); 4) Bone and cartilage metabolism (alteration in local tissue metabolism); 5) mechanical overload characterised primarily by varus malalignment and medial compartment disease; and 6) minimal joint disease characterised as minor clinical symptoms with slow progression over time. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified six distinct groups of variables which should be explored in attempts to better define clinical phenotypes in the KOA population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305276687 · Cited by 44,601
Psychological profiles and pain characteristics of older adults with knee osteoarthritis
Cruz‐Almeida, Y., King, C. D., Goodin, B. R., Sibille, K. T., Glover, T. L., Riley, J. L., Sotolongo, A., Herbert, M. S., Schmidt, J., Fessler, B. J., et al. (2013) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.22070 · Cited by 157
Cited by
Epidemiology of osteoarthritis
Allen, K. D., Thoma, L. M., & Golightly, Y. M. (2022) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2021.04.020 · Cited by 929
Knee osteoarthritis phenotypes and their relevance for outcomes: a systematic review
Deveza, L. A., Melo, L., Yamato, T. P., Mills, K., Ravi, V., & Hunter, D. J. (2017) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2017.08.009 · Cited by 331
Knee osteoarthritis: Current status and research progress in treatment (Review)
Geng, R., Li, J., Yu, C., Zhang, C., Chen, F., Chen, J., Ni, H., Wang, J., Kang, K., Wei, Z., et al. (2023) · Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine · doi:10.3892/etm.2023.12180 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Dell’Isola, A., Allan, R., Smith, S. L., Marreiros, S. S. P., & Steultjens, M.
- Venue
- BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Published
- 2016-10-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 425-425
- ISSN
- 1471-2474 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2531292545
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of clinical phenotypes in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12891-016-1286-2
- The paper
- Dell’Isola, A., Allan, R., Smith, S. L., Marreiros, S. S. P., & Steultjens, M. (2016). Identification of clinical phenotypes in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1286-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.