Cited by 10Diabetes Management and ResearchHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsDiabetes Treatment and Management

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between using subcutaneous insulin and continuous insulin infusion in managing adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis

Open access
Alnuaimi, Ahmed, Mach, Tiffany, Reynier, Pauline, Filion, Kristian B., Lipes, Jed, Yu, Oriana Hoi Yun·2024·BMC Endocrine Disorders

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the current literature to determine the safety and efficacy of using subcutaneous insulin compared to an intravenous (IV) insulin infusion in managing diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). We searched Ovid-Medline, EMBASE, SCOPUS, BIOSIS and CENTRAL from inception to April 26, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that assessed the use of subcutaneous compared to intravenous insulin for the treatment of mild to moderate DKA were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers and disagreements were resolved through further discussion or by a third reviewer. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2.0 was used to evaluate the RCTs and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS)-I tool was used to evaluate the observational studies. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. We followed the PRISMA guidelines for reporting our findings. Six RCTs (245 participants) and four observational studies (8444 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Some studies showed a decreased length of stay (Mean Difference [MD] in days: -0.39; 95% CI: -2.83 to 2.08; I 2 : 0%) among individuals treated with subcutaneous insulin compared to intravenous insulin. There was no difference in the risk of all-cause mortality, time to resolution of DKA (MD in hours: 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.45 to 3.79; I 2 : 0%) and hypoglycemia (Risk Ratio [RR]: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.19; I 2 : 0%) between the two groups. Treatment of DKA with subcutaneous insulin may be a safe and effective alternative to IV insulin in selected patients. The limited available evidence underscores the need for further studies to explore optimal dosing, patient selection criteria and long-term outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12902-024-01666-6

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no significant difference in outcomes for intravenous human regular insulin versus subcutaneous rapid-acting analogs when combined with aggressive fluid management for treating mild or moderate DKA.

    “There is no significant difference in outcomes for intravenous human regular insulin versus subcutaneous rapid-acting analogs when combined with aggressive fluid management for treating mild or moderate DKA (182).”

    From 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [182]

    The Results report that 712 participants received subcutaneous rapid-acting insulin analogues and 7,962 received intravenous regular insulin; the Conclusion finds no important difference in overall mortality or adverse outcomes for mild-to-moderate DKA. The paper does not establish that this finding depends on aggressive fluid management, and it reports shorter hospital stays in some subcutaneous-insulin studies. Sections cited have no page numbers in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Prasad A, Gupta A. Role of insulin aspart in Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis. Indian J Res. 2015;4(7):61–2.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alnuaimi, A., Mach, T., Reynier, P., Filion, K. B., Lipes, J., & Yu, O. H. Y.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Yu, Oriana Hoi Yun
Venue
BMC Endocrine Disorders
Published
2024-08-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
133-133
ISSN
1472-6823 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401225039
Cited by
9
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Endocrine Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fonds de recherche du Québec - santé
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
diabetic ketoacidosis, subcutaneous insulin, intravenous insulin infusion, insulin delivery route, length of hospital stay, hypoglycemia, all-cause mortality, treatment efficacy and safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Infusions, Intravenous, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review