Cited by 0Facial Trauma and Fracture ManagementReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesBone fractures and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Trans-tarsal stair-step versus transconjunctival approach in orbito-zygomaticomaxillary fractures: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

Open access

Abstract

Background: Various techniques have been proposed for treating orbito-zygomaticomaxillary fractures, each with distinct benefits and drawbacks. Aim of this study: To compare Trans-tarsal Stair-Step Lateral Extension of the Transconjunctival approach with transconjunctival approach combined with lateral eyebrow incision in the management of orbital and zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures with respect to accessibility to fracture site and exposure duration as primary aims. Materials and methods: Twenty patients, aged between 18 and 60 years, who has orbito-zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures were randomly assigned to two equal groups: Group A underwent the trans-tarsal stair-step lateral extension of the transconjunctival approach and Group B received the conventional transconjunctival approach combined with lateral eyebrow incision. Intraoperative parameters which were accessibility to fracture site, exposure duration and total operative time and postoperative parameters which were postoperative edema, postoperative scar and esthetic appearance, postoperative pain and infraorbital sensory nerve function objectively, all were assessed. Results: Group A achieved same surgical access to the fracture site as Group B. Group A and group B had same exposure time. Group A had less total operative time than Group B. Group A consistently showed the less postoperative edema at first 48 h, one week, and four weeks. Non noticeable scarring was reported only in Group A patients while group B had a noticeable scar at the lateral eyebrow incision. Within the first 24 h, there was significant difference in pain levels that was noted between the two groups. Group A had faster recovery in sensory nerve function than group B. Conclusion: The trans-tarsal stair-step lateral extension of the transconjunctival approach demonstrated favorable postoperative outcomes regarding pain, edema, and sensory recovery compared to the conventional technique with lateral eyebrow incision with same exposure area and no increase in exposure time and less total operative time. Trial registration: The trial has been retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT07044258) on 19-6-2025.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12903-026-08842-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Melek LN, Noureldin MG. Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: finding the least complicated surgical approach (a randomized clinical trial). BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):539. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Melek LN, Sharara AA. Retrospective study of maxillofacial trauma in Alexandria University: Analysis of 177 cases. Tanta Dent J. 2016;13(1):28–33. · DOI
  3. Kurita M, Okazaki M, Ozaki M, Tanaka Y, Tsuji N, Takushima A, Harii K. Patient satisfaction after open reduction and internal fixation of zygomatic bone fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(1):45–9. · DOI
  4. Ji SY, Kim SS, Kim MH, Yang WS. Surgical methods of zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture. Archives Craniofac Surg. 2016;17(4):206. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Subramanian B, Krishnamurthy S, Suresh Kumar P, Saravanan B, Padhmanabhan M. Comparison of various approaches for exposure of infraorbital rim fractures of zygoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;8:99–102. · DOI
  6. Waheed El-Anwar M, Elsheikh E, Sweed AH, Ezzeldin N. Electromyography assessment in zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Oral maxillofacial Surg. 2015;19:375–9. · DOI
  7. Kumar R, Ali R, Zaidi SAA, Maheshwari B, Ahmed K. Subciliary and Subtarsal incision in management of zygomatico-orbital fracture, a study on scar assessment. Pakistan J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(05):624–624. · DOI
  8. Novelli G, Ferrari L, Sozzi D, Mazzoleni F, Bozzetti A. Transconjunctival approach in orbital traumatology: a review of 56 cases. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2011;39(4):266–70. · DOI
  9. El-Anwar MW, Elsheikh E, Hussein AM, Tantawy AA, Abdelbaki YM. Transconjunctival versus subciliary approach to the infraorbital margin for open reduction of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: a randomized feasibility study. Oral maxillofacial Surg. 2017;21(2):187–92. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Wray RC Jr, Holtmann B, Ribaudo JM, Keiter J, Weeks PM. A comparison of conjunctival and subciliary incisions for orbital fractures. Br J Plast Surg. 1977;30(2):142–5. · DOI
  11. Holtmann B, Wray RC, Little AG. A randomized comparison of four incisions for orbital fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;67(6):731–5. · DOI
  12. McCord C Jr, Moses J. Exposure of the inferior orbit with fornix incision and lateral canthotomy. Ophthalmic Surg. 1979;10(6):53–63.
  13. de Chalain TM, Cohen SR, Burstein FD. Modification of the transconjunctival lower lid approach to the orbital floor: lateral paracanthal incision. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94(6):877–80. · DOI
  14. Biesman BS. Lateral paracanthal incision. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(7):1751. · DOI
  15. Jeong EC, Han J. Reply: Modified Transconjunctival Lower Lid Approach for Orbital Fractures in East Asian Patients: The Lateral Paracanthal Incision Revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(1):118e. · DOI
  16. Kim D-W, Choi S-R, Park S-H, Koo S-H. Versatile use of extended transconjunctival approach for orbital reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62(4):374–80. · DOI
  17. Song J, Lee GK, Kwon ST, Kim SW, Jeong EC. Modified transconjunctival lower lid approach for orbital fractures in East Asian patients: the lateral paracanthal incision revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(5):1023–30. · DOI
  18. Yassin AM, Shaaban AM, Noureldin MG. Evaluation of the Y-shaped modification of the transconjuctival approach in open reduction of zygomatic maxillary complex fracture (clinical trial). Alexandria Dent J. 2022;47(1):9–15.
  19. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–60. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Chung J-H, You H-J, Hwang N-H, Kim D-W, Yoon E-S. Transconjuctival incision with lateral paracanthal extension for corrective osteotomy of malunioned zygoma. Archives Craniofac Surg. 2016;17(3):119. · DOI
  21. Garvey SR, Chen A, Nassar AH, Cauley RP. Trans-tarsal stair-step technique for lateral extension of the transconjunctival incision: a technical note and case series. Eplasty. 2024;24:e22.
  22. Salgarelli AC, Bellini P, Landini B, Multinu A, Consolo U. A comparative study of different approaches in the treatment of orbital trauma: an experience based on 274 cases. Oral maxillofacial Surg. 2010;14(1):23–7. · DOI
  23. Olarte HF, Abello S, Castro-Núñez J. A modified lateral canthal approach for the treatment of zygomatic complex fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(8):1552. e1551-1552. e1553.
  24. Thangavelu K, Ganesh NS, Kumar JA, Sabitha S. Evaluation of the lateral orbital approach in management of zygomatic bone fractures. J Nat Sci Biology Med. 2013;4(1):117. · DOI
  25. Uemura T, Chuman T, Fujii T, Morikawa A, Kikuchi M, Watanabe H. Retroseptal transconjunctival approach for blowout fracture of the orbital floor: an ideal choice in East-Asian patients. Plast Reconstr Surgery–Global Open. 2016;4(5):e725. · DOI
  26. Kumar S, Shubhalaksmi S. Clinical outcome following use of transconjunctival approach in reducing orbitozygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016;7(2):163–9. · DOI
  27. Kumar P, Godhi S, Lall AB, Ram C. Evaluation of neurosensory changes in the infraorbital nerve following zygomatic fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;11(4):394–9. · DOI
  28. Johnson C. Measuring pain. Visual analog scale versus numeric pain scale: what is the difference? J Chiropr Med. 2005;4(1):43. · DOI
  29. Kesselring AG, Promes P, Strabbing EM, van der Wal KG, Koudstaal MJ. Lower eyelid malposition following orbital fracture surgery: a retrospective analysis based on 198 surgeries. Craniomaxillofacial trauma reconstruction. 2016;9(2):109–12. · DOI
  30. Soliman L, Rhee B, Lerner JL, Sobti N, Rao V, Woo AS. Lateral canthotomy revisited: a refined surgical approach for orbital access. Plast Reconstr Surgery–Global Open. 2023;11(5):e5014. · DOI
  31. Bonawitz S, Crawley W, Shores JT, Manson PN. Modified transconjunctival approach to the lower eyelid: technical details for predictable results. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstruction. 2016;9(1):029–34. · DOI
  32. Santosh B, Giraddi G. Transconjunctival preseptal approach for orbital floor and infraorbital rim fracture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;10(4):301–5. · DOI
  33. da Silveira JSZ. Edema Management in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Inflammation in the 21st Century 2022:59. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.80971. · DOI
  34. Kashiyama K, Yano H, Imamura Y, Iwao A, Higashi A, Moriuti Y, Ashizuka S, Adachi Y, Koga K, Hirano A. Scarring Caused by the Percutaneous Approach to Fractures of the Orbit and Orbital Rim. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(4):1143–6. · DOI
  35. Shoukath S, Taylor GI, Mendelson BC, Corlett RJ, Shayan R, Tourani SS, Ashton MW. The lymphatic anatomy of the lower eyelid and conjunctiva and correlation with postoperative chemosis and edema. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(3):e628–37. · DOI
  36. Dickinson A, Gausas R. Orbital lymphatics: do they exist? Eye. 2006;20(10):1145–8. · DOI
  37. Lakshmi R, Chitra A, Singh A, Pentapati KC, Gadicherla S. Neurosensory assessment of infraorbital nerve injury following unilateral zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture–a prospective study. Open Dentistry J. 2022;16(1). https://doi.org/10.2174/18742106-v16-e2206140. · DOI
  38. de Carvalho M, Vieira J, Figueiredo R, Reher P, Chrcanovic BR, Chaves M. Validity of computed tomography in diagnosing midfacial fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;50(4):471–6. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Sobhy, D. E., Dessoky, N. Y., Alryess, A. M., & Noureldin, M. G.
Affiliations
Alexandria University (EG)
Corresponding author
Sobhy, David Emad
Venue
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-06-17
Volume
26
Issue
1
ISSN
1472-6831 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7164900374
Cited by
0
References
34
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Oral Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Alexandria University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone fractures and treatments
Keywords
transconjunctival approach, orbital fractures, zygomatic fractures, postoperative swelling, postoperative scar, postoperative pain, operative time
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Conjunctiva, Esthetics, Female, Fracture Fixation, Internal, Humans, Male, Maxillary Fractures, Middle Aged, Orbital Fractures, Postoperative Pain, Prospective Studies, Zygomatic Fractures, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Operative Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review