Cited by 11Innovations in Medical EducationE-Learning and COVID-19Education during COVID-19 pandemic

The impact of COVID-19 on online medical education: a knowledge graph analysis based on co-term analysis

Open access
Deng, Huijiao, Jiang, Yi, Han, Qinrong, Zhou, Xingyu, Zhong, Siyang, Hu, Kai, Yang, Lin·2023·BMC Medical Education

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: This study aims to identify the characteristics and future directions of online medical education in the context of the novel coronavirus outbreak new through visual analytics using CiteSpace and VOSviewer bibliometric methods. Method: From Web of Science, we searched for articles published between 2020 and 2022 using the terms online education, medical education and COVID-19, ended up with 2555 eligible papers, and the articles published between 2010 and 2019 using the terms online education, medical education and COVID-19, and we ended up with 4313 eligible papers. Results: Before the COVID-19 outbreak, Medical students and care were the most frequent keywords and the most cited author was BRENT THOMA with 18 times. The United States is the country with the greatest involvement and research impact in the field of online medical education. The most cited journal is ACAD MED with 1326 citations. After the COVID-19 outbreak, a surge in the number of research results in related fields, and ANXIETY and four secondary keywords were identified. In addition, the concentration of authors of these publications in the USA and China is a strong indication that local epidemics and communication technologies have influenced the development of online medical education research. Regarding the centrality of research institutions, the most influential co-author network is Harvard Medical School in the United States; and regarding the centrality of references, the most representative journal to which it belongs is VACCINE. Conclusion: This study found that hey information such as keywords, major institutions and authors, and countries differ in the papers before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. The novel coronavirus outbreak had a significant impact on the online education aspect. For non-medical and medical students, the pandemic has led to home isolation, making it difficult to offer face-to-face classes such as laboratory operations. Students have lost urgency and control over the specifics of face-to-face instruction, which has reduced the quality of teaching. Therefore, we should improve our education model according to the actual situation to ensure the quality of teaching while taking into account the physical and psychological health of students.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12909-023-04193-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knowledge graphs can help learners move beyond isolated memorization and visualize how different concepts are connected, thereby facilitating knowledge organization, cognitive mapping, and conceptual integration.

    “By making such relationships explicit, knowledge graphs can help learners move beyond isolated memorization and visualize how different concepts are connected, thereby facilitating knowledge organization, cognitive mapping, and conceptual integration [14].”

    From Effectiveness of a generative AI-powered digital tutor integrated with a knowledge graph in anatomy education for nursing students: a randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Method (Research overview; page unavailable) describes visualizing relationships among co-occurring subject terms, which supports the claim that a graph can make connections visible. It uses those graphs to analyze research literature, however; it does not say that learners use them to move beyond memorization or improve knowledge organization, cognitive mapping, or conceptual integration. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Knowledge graphs provide a structured visual representation of relationships among concepts, enabling students to organize knowledge more effectively.

    “Knowledge graphs provide a structured visual representation of relationships among concepts, enabling students to organize knowledge more effectively [12, 14].”

    From Effectiveness of a generative AI-powered digital tutor integrated with a knowledge graph in anatomy education for nursing students: a randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Method (Research overview; page unavailable) describes visual maps of relationships among co-occurring terms. The paper uses these maps to analyze research literature, however, and does not say that they help students organize their knowledge more effectively. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The integration of AI tutoring with knowledge graphs supports structured knowledge construction.

    “Third, the integration of AI tutoring with knowledge graphs supports structured knowledge construction [14, 23].”

    From Effectiveness of a generative AI-powered digital tutor integrated with a knowledge graph in anatomy education for nursing students: a randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Method (Research overview; page unavailable) describes bibliometric keyword networks made with CiteSpace and VOSviewer, not knowledge graphs used for tutoring. Searches for AI tutoring, artificial intelligence, and structured knowledge construction found no passage addressing whether their integration supports learning. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The results highlight the importance of combining AI technologies with structured knowledge representation tools, such as knowledge graphs.

    “Second, the results highlight the importance of combining AI technologies with structured knowledge representation tools, such as knowledge graphs [12, 13, 14].”

    From Effectiveness of a generative AI-powered digital tutor integrated with a knowledge graph in anatomy education for nursing students: a randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Method (Research overview; page unavailable) describes using CiteSpace and VOSviewer to visualize bibliometric networks. Searches for AI, artificial intelligence, and integration with knowledge graphs found no passage in our copy saying that combining them is important. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. [1]Priftis K, Velardo V, Vascello MGF, Villella S, Galeri S, Spada MS, et al. Limited evidence for neuropsychological dysfunction in patients initially affected by severe COVID-19. Neurol Sci. 2022. 10.1007/s10072-022-06373-5. PMC9436465 36050424 · DOI
  2. [2]Katz M Nandi N Social media and medical education in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: scoping review JMIR Med Educ 2021 7 e25892 10.2196/25892 33755578 PMC8043144 · DOI
  3. [3]Sheikh A Sheikh A Sheikh Z Dhami S Reopening schools after the COVID-19 lockdown J Glob Health 2020 10 010376 10.7189/jogh.10.010376 32612815 PMC7321012 · DOI
  4. [4]Masonbrink AR Hurley E Advocating for children during the COVID-19 school closures Pediatrics 2020 146 e20201440 10.1542/peds.2020-1440 32554517 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [6]Gao J Yang L Zou J Fan X Comparison of the influence of massive open online courses and traditional teaching methods in medical education in China: a meta-analysis Biochem Mol Biol Educ 2021 49 639 651 10.1002/bmb.21523 33894023 · DOI
  6. [7]Ebrahimi A, Ebrahimi S, Ashkani Esfahani S. How COVID-19 pandemic can lead to promotion of remote medical education and democratization of education? J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020;8(3):144-145. 10.30476/jamp.2020.86090.1217. PMC7395197 32802909 · DOI
  7. [8]O’Doherty D Dromey M Lougheed J Hannigan A Last J McGrath D Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education – an integrative review BMC Med Educ 2018 18 130 10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0 29880045 PMC5992716 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [9]Liu JW Huang LC Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends and Transient Patterns in Fuel Cell Scientific Literature 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing 2008 Dalian IEEE 1 4
  9. [10]Ma Y Zhou R Wu Q Global research hotspots and research trends on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a bibliometric and visualization analysis Ann Palliat Med 2021 10 9057 9068 10.21037/apm-21-1836 34455797 · DOI
  10. [11]Liu S Sun Y-P Gao X-L Sui Y Knowledge domain and emerging trends in Alzheimer’s disease: a scientometric review based on CiteSpace analysis Neural Regen Res 2019 14 1643 10.4103/1673-5374.255995 31089065 PMC6557102 · DOI
  11. [12]Ma D Guan B Song L Liu Q Fan Y Zhao L A bibliometric analysis of exosomes in cardiovascular diseases from 2001 to 2021 Front Cardiovasc Med 2021 8 734514 10.3389/fcvm.2021.734514 34513962 PMC8424118 · DOI
  12. [13]Goh P-S Sandars J A vision of the use of technology in medical education after the COVID-19 pandemic MedEdPublish 2020 9 49 10.15694/mep.2020.000049.1 PMC10697445 38058893 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [15]van Eck NJ Waltman L Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping Scientometrics 2010 84 523 538 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 20585380 PMC2883932 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [16]Ferri F Grifoni P Guzzo T Online Learning and Emergency Remote Teaching: Opportunities and Challenges in Emergency Situations Societies 2020 10 86 10.3390/soc10040086 · DOI
  15. [17]Zhang W Wang Y Yang L Wang C Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 outbreak JRFM 2020 13 55 10.3390/jrfm13030055 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [19]Saddik B Hussein A Sharif-Askari FS Kheder W Temsah M-H Koutaich RA Increased levels of anxiety among medical and non-Medical University students during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Arab Emirates RMHP 2020 13 2395 2406 10.2147/RMHP.S273333 PMC7652570 33177898 · DOI
  17. [20]García-González J Ruqiong W Alarcon-Rodriguez R Requena-Mullor M Ding C Ventura-Miranda MI Analysis of anxiety levels of nursing students because of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic Healthcare 2021 9 252 10.3390/healthcare9030252 33804344 PMC8001948 · DOI
  18. [21]Shamir-Inbal T Blau I Facilitating emergency remote K-12 teaching in computing-enhanced virtual learning environments During COVID-19 pandemic - blessing or curse? J Educa Comput Res 2021 59 1243 1271 10.1177/0735633121992781 · DOI
  19. [22]Dhawan S Online learning: a Panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis J Educ Technol Syst 2020 49 5 22 10.1177/0047239520934018 · DOI
  20. [23]Srivastava S Jacob J Charles AS Daniel P Mathew JK Shanthi P Emergency remote learning in anatomy during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study evaluating academic factors contributing to anxiety among first year medical students Med J Armed Forces India 2021 77 S90 S98 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.12.012 33612938 PMC7873698 · DOI
  21. [25]Morreale SP, Thorpe J, Westwick JN. Online teaching: challenge or opportunity for communication education scholars? Commun Educ. 2021;70:117–9.
  22. [26]Young S Student views of effective online teaching in higher education Am J Distance Educ 2006 20 65 77 10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2 · DOI
  23. [27]Coman C Țîru LG Meseșan-Schmitz L Stanciu C Bularca MC Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: students’ perspective Sustainability 2020 12 10367 10.3390/su122410367 · DOI
  24. [28]Alsoufi A Alsuyihili A Msherghi A Elhadi A Atiyah H Ashini A Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education: medical students’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding electronic learning PLoS ONE 2020 15 e24821 10.1371/journal.pone.0242905 PMC7688124 33237962 · DOI
  25. [29]Bączek M Zagańczyk-Bączek M Szpringer M Jaroszyński A Wożakowska-Kapłon B Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study of polish medical students Medicine 2021 100 e24821 10.1097/MD.0000000000024821 33607848 PMC7899848 · DOI
  26. [30]Motte-Signoret E Labbé A Benoist G Linglart A Gajdos V Lapillonne A Perception of medical education by learners and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of online teaching Med Educ Online 2021 26 1919042 10.1080/10872981.2021.1919042 33871308 PMC8079026 · DOI
  27. [31]Dost S Hossain A Shehab M Abdelwahed A Al-Nusair L Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students BMJ Open 2020 10 e042378 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042378 PMC7646323 33154063 · DOI
  28. [32]Yu S Liu Y Yang B Chen Z Disciplinary differences in the experience of online education among teachers and students in Chinese universities during COVID-19 Front Psychol 2022 13 909269 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.909269 36186336 PMC9518645 · DOI
  29. [34]Topal M, İstanbullu A, Kucuk-avcı S. Covid-19 effects on distance education in higher education: a comparison with bibliometric analysis before Covid-19 pandemic and the Covid-19 pandemic periods. J Educ Technol Online Learn. 2021;4(4): 864-879. 10.31681/jetol.1016705. · DOI
  30. [35]Wei X Li X Song S Trends and focuses of hantavirus researches: a global bibliometric analysis and visualization from 1980 to 2020 Arch Public Health 2022 80 218 10.1186/s13690-022-00973-5 36182906 PMC9526533 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deng, H., Jiang, Y., Han, Q., Zhou, X., Zhong, S., Hu, K., & Yang, L.
Affiliations
  • Zunyi Medical University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Hu, Kai
  • Yang, Lin
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Published
2023-04-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
203-203
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362522295
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • the College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of Zunyi Medical University (No.ZHCX2022002, No.ZHCX2022003)
  • National Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for College Students (No.202210661029)
  • Cooperative Education Project of Production and Education of the Higher Education Department of the Ministry of Education (No.202101250012)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82260456)
  • The Undergraduate education and teaching reform plan project of Zunyi Medical University (No.XJJG2022-95)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
Keywords
online medical education, COVID-19 pandemic, medical students, online learning, research trends, co-authorship networks, teaching quality, student mental health
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Education, Medical, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Education, Distance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review