Cited by 3Medical Education and AdmissionsInnovations in Medical EducationDiversity and Career in Medicine

Exploring the breadth of medicine: 8-year outcomes of a brief clinical summer immersion for premedical students

Open access
Weinlander, Eva, Sams, Elizabeth, Khemani, Sarita, Jamal, Armaan, Srinivasan, Malathi·2024·BMC Medical Education

Abstract

Background: Exposure to the breadth of healthcare opportunities is crucial to high-school and college students considering a career in medicine. Most programs revolve around research or subspecialties, limiting exposure to the richness within medicine. Objective: We conducted a program evaluation of the Stanford Clinical Summer Internship (CSI) 2-week program, to understand learner viewpoints around CSI program utility, and to assess long term impact. We assess viewpoints by learner level (high school versus college) and participation mode (in-person versus virtual). Methods: In 2016 we launched a two-week premedical internship, incorporating AAMC core competencies. In 2022 and 2023, we surveyed past participants, collecting demographic data and evaluating/comparing CSI’s impact on educational and career paths, future preferences in healthcare careers, and influential factors of matriculation for high-school and college participants. Results: Of 411 past participants, 42% responded ( n = 173). We found minimal significant differences between high school and college students. The primary reason for joining was exploring a career in health professions. Notably, 82% acknowledged Stanford-CSI broadened their medical perspectives, 79% gained clarity on healthcare professionals' daily life, 79% heightened their interest in healthcare careers, 71% enhanced their resumes, and 72% learned valuable clinical skills. In-person participants reported developing more friendships (agree/strongly agree: 60% vs 35%, unpaired t-test: p = 0.01), while virtual participants reported having more interest in research careers (40% vs 68%, p = 0.01). Amongst high school matriculants ( n = 133), 46% are now in college and 4% in medical or nursing school. Amongst collegiate matriculants ( n = 40), 89% have graduated and 11% are now in graduate or medical school. All respondents believed Stanford-CSI was a worthwhile investment of time and resources, with nearly all reporting subsequent increased interest in medicine. Conclusions: Stanford-CSI's summer internship gives premedical students real-world medical profession exposure and fosters meaningful connections. Our findings and teaching framework can guide similar program developments, supporting future medical education initiatives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12909-024-06301-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [1]Chang A, Cavanaugh G, Kumar NS, Lee M, Stein D, Mulcahey MK. Mini-medical school programs’ influence on students’ desire to pursue medicine. J Natl Med Assoc. 2016;108(3):152-157.e2. 10.1016/j.jnma.2016.05.005. 27692355 · DOI
  2. [2]Alawad AAMA, Khan WS, Abdelrazig YM, et al. Factors considered by undergraduate medical students when selecting specialty of their future careers. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;20:102. 10.11604/pamj.2015.20.102.4715. 26090050 PMC4458322 · DOI
  3. [3]Davis JM, Anderson MC, Stankevitz KA, Manley AR. Providing premedical students with quality clinical and research experience: the Tobacco science scholars program. WMJ Off Publ State Med Soc Wis. 2013;112(5):195–8. PMC4023636 24734413
  4. [4]Butts CA, Speer JJ, Brady JJ, et al. Introduction to Clerkship: Bridging the Gap Between Preclinical and Clinical Medical Education. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2019;119(9):578–87. 10.7556/jaoa.2019.101. 31449304 · DOI
  5. [5]Wang JY, Lin H, Lewis PY, Fetterman DM, Gesundheit N. Is a career in medicine the right choice? The impact of a physician shadowing program on undergraduate premedical students. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2015;90(5):629–33. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000615. 25565263 · DOI
  6. [6]Joseph J, Dao D, Hwang SM, et al. Perceptions of barriers and facilitators to becoming a medical professional among underrepresented undergraduate and postbaccalaureate learners. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021;5(2):347–58. 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.01.003. 33997634 PMC8105502 · DOI
  7. [7]Willenbring BD, McKee KC, Wilson BV, Henry TD. The Minneapolis heart institute foundation summer research internship program: the benefits of preprofessional experience for prospective physicians. Minn Med. 2008;91(8):47–9. 18773709
  8. [8]Kaye KE, Berns AL, Cress LR, Nazar AM. Mini-medical school programs are an effective tool to introduce students to osteopathic medicine. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014;114(2):109–12. 10.7556/jaoa.2014.024. 24481803 · DOI
  9. [12]Gale RC, Wu J, Erhardt T, et al. Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):11. 10.1186/s13012-019-0853-y. 30709368 PMC6359833 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [13]Keith RE, Crosson JC, O’Malley AS, Cromp D, Taylor EF. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: a rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):15. 10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7. 28187747 PMC5303301 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [14]Ballengee LA, Rushton S, Lewinski AA, et al. Figure 2, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (Adapted). August 2020. Accessed September 4, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK577878/figure/ch3.fig2/.
  12. [15]Renfro CP, Rome Z, Gatwood J, Hohmeier KC. Use of Rapid Assessment Procedures when analyzing qualitative data in pharmacy research. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2022;18(1):2249–53. 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.05.013. 34116965 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [20]Briskey M, Ayyash A, Chang A, Mulcahey MK. The Effect of DUCOM’s Mini-Medical School Summer Camp on Students’ Interests in Medicine. J Natl Med Assoc. 2017;109(2):107–14. 10.1016/j.jnma.2017.01.002. 28599752 · DOI

Cited by

Authors
Weinlander, E., Sams, E., Khemani, S., Jamal, A., & Srinivasan, M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Sams, Elizabeth
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Published
2024-11-28
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1387-1387
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404817889
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
premedical students, program evaluation, high school students, university students, virtual participation, medical school matriculation, career choice, clinical skills
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Career Choice, Curriculum, Education, Premedical, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Students, Premedical, Program Evaluation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review