Cited by 18Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationInnovations in Medical EducationArtificial Intelligence in Education

AI-based medical ethics education: examining the potential of large language models as a tool for virtue cultivation

Open access
Okamoto, Shimpei, Kataoka, Masanori, Itano, Makoto, Sawai, Tsutomu·2025·BMC Medical Education

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly revolutionising medicine, this study critically evaluates the integration of large language models (LLMs), known for advanced text processing and generation capabilities, in medical ethics education, focusing on promoting virtue. Positing LLMs as central to mimicking nuanced human communication, it examines their use in medical education and the ethicality of embedding AI in such contexts. METHOD: Using a hybrid approach that combines principlist and non-principlist methodologies, we position LLMs as exemplars and advisors. RESULTS: We discuss the imperative for including AI ethics in medical curricula and its utility as an educational tool, identify the lack of educational resources in medical ethics education, and advocate for future LLMs to mitigate this problem as a "second-best" tool. We also emphasise the critical importance of instilling virtue in medical ethics education and illustrate how LLMs can effectively impart moral knowledge and model virtue cultivation. We address expected counter-arguments to using LLMs in this area and explain their profound potential to enrich medical ethics education, including facilitating the acquisition of moral knowledge and developing ethically grounded practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: The study involved a comprehensive exploration of the function of LLMs in medical ethics education, positing that tools such as ChatGPT can profoundly enhance the learning experience in the future. This is achieved through tailored, interactive educational encounters while addressing the ethical nuances of their use in educational settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12909-025-06801-y

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Institutions have begun offering targeted professional development programmes aimed at building educators' capacity to understand, evaluate, and apply AI tools in pedagogically meaningful ways.

    “institutions have begun offering targeted professional development programmes aimed at building educators' capacity to understand, evaluate, and apply AI tools in pedagogically meaningful ways (Alharbi, 2024; Cai et al., 2025; Okamoto et al., 2025).”

    From Six Institutional Intervention Areas to Support Ethical and Effective Student Use of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as Okamoto et al., 2025

    The Introduction discusses AI literacy in medical curricula and the use of LLMs as pedagogical tools. Neither it nor the “LLMs for medical education” section addresses institutions offering professional development programmes for educators; searches for educator training and faculty development found no such passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. [1]Davenport T, Kalakota R. The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J. 2019;6:94–8. 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94. PMC6616181 31363513 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [4]Sun L, Yin C, Xu Q, Zhao W. Artificial intelligence for healthcare and medical education: a systematic review. Am J Transl Res. 2023;15:4820–28. 37560249 PMC10408516
  3. [8]Carrese JA, Malek J, Watson K, Lehmann LS, Green MJ, McCullough LB, et al. The essential role of medical ethics education in achieving professionalism: the Romanell Report. Acad Med. 2015;90:744–52. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000715. 25881647 · DOI
  4. [9]Segers S. Why we should (not) worry about generative AI in medical ethics teaching. Int J Ethics Educ. 2024;9:57–63. 10.1007/s40889-023-00179-5. · DOI · Paper page
  5. [10]Rahimzadeh V, Kostick-Quenet K, Blumenthal Barby JB, McGuire AL. Ethics Education for Healthcare Professionals in the era of ChatGPT and other large Language models: do we still need it? Am J Bioeth. 2023;23:17–27. 10.1080/15265161.2023.2233358. 37487184 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [11]Jonsen AR. A short history of medical ethics. Oxford University Press; 2000.
  7. [12]Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ. Clinical Ethics: a practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. McGraw-Hill; 2015.
  8. [13]Dunn M, Hope T. Medical ethics: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press; 2019.
  9. [14]Wilkinson D, Herring J, Savulescu J. Medical Ethics and law: a curriculum for the 21st Century. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019.
  10. [16]Pellegrino ED. Toward a virtue-based normative ethics for the health professions. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995;5:253–77. 10.1353/ken.0.0044. 10144959 · DOI
  11. [17]Pellegrino E, Tomasma D. The virtues in medical practice. Oxford University Press; 1993.
  12. [18]Lyon W. Virtue and medical ethics education. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2021;16:2. 10.1186/s13010-021-00100-2. 34039382 PMC8157421 · DOI
  13. [19]Hindocha S, Badea C. Moral exemplars for the virtuous machine: the clinician’s role in ethical artificial intelligence for healthcare. AI Ethics. 2022;2:167–75. 10.1007/s43681-021-00089-6. · DOI
  14. [20]Giubilini A, Milnes S, Savulescu J. The medical ethics curriculum in medical schools: present and future. J Clin Ethics. 2016;27:129–45. 10.1086/JCE2016272129. 27333063 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [21]Silverman HJ, Dagenais J, Gordon-Lipkin E, Caputo L, Christian MW, Maidment BW III, et al. Perceived comfort level of medical students and residents in handling clinical ethics issues. J Med Ethics. 2013;39:55–8. 10.1136/medethics-2011-100300. 23065491 · DOI
  16. [22]Stites SD, Clapp J, Gallagher S, Fiester A. Moving beyond the theoretical: medical students’ desire for practical, role-specific ethics training. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018;9:154–63. 10.1080/23294515.2018.1472149. 29727598 · DOI
  17. [23]Guilherme A. AI and education: the importance of teacher and student relations. AI Soc. 2019;34:47–54. 10.1007/s00146-017-0693-8. · DOI
  18. [26]Anderson M, Anderson SL, Armen C. MedEthEx: a prototype medical ethics advisor. In: Porter B, editor. IAAI’06: Proceedings of the 18th conference on Innovative applications of artificial intelligence. Vol. 2. AAAI Press; 2006. pp. 1759–65.
  19. [27]Giubilini A, Savulescu J. The artificial moral advisor: the ideal observer meets artificial intelligence. Philos Technol. 2018;31:169–88. 10.1007/s13347-017-0285-z 29974033 PMC6004274 · DOI
  20. [28]Zagzebski LT. Exemplarist moral theory. Oxford University Press; 2017.
  21. [30]Hursthouse R. On virtue ethics. Oxford University Press; 1999.
  22. [31]Tan C. Digital Confucius? Exploring the implications of artificial intelligence in spiritual education. Connect Sci. 2020;32:280–91. 10.1080/09540091.2019.1709045. · DOI
  23. [32]Hills A. Moral testimony and moral epistemology. Ethics. 2009;120:94–127. 10.1086/648610. · DOI
  24. [34]Liu J, Fan L, Jiang J, Li C, Tian L, Zhang X, et al. Evidence for dynamic attentional bias toward positive emotion-laden words: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. Front Psychol. 2022;13:966774. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.966774. 36051211 PMC9426460 · DOI
  25. [35]Krügel S, Ostermaier A, Uhl M. ChatGPT’s inconsistent moral advice influences users’ judgment. Sci Rep. 2023;13:4569. 10.1038/s41598-023-31341-0. 37024502 PMC10079665 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [36]Searight HR, Allmayer S. The use of feature film to teach medical ethics: overview and assessment. Int J Mod Educ Forum. 2014;3:1. 10.14355/ijmef.2014.0301.01. · DOI
  27. [37]Aryanty N, Raudhoh S. Cinemedicine: the use of movies to teach bioethical principles for undergraduate medical students. In: Kurniawan DA, editor. Proceedings of the 4th Green Development International Conference (GDIC 2022). Atlantis Press; 2023. pp. 58–64. 10.2991/978-2-38476-110-4_7 · DOI
  28. [38]Tachibana K, editor. Alternative virtues: Japanese perspectives on Christian and confucian traditions. Routledge; 2024. 10.4324/9781003397069. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Okamoto, S., Kataoka, M., Itano, M., & Sawai, T.
Affiliations
Hiroshima University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sawai, Tsutomu
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Published
2025-02-05
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
185-185
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407176572
Cited by
18
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 6
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21K12908)
  • Uehiro Foundation on Ethics and Education (UEHIRO2023-0111)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
large language models, medical ethics education, virtue ethics, artificial intelligence in medical education, ChatGPT, principlism, AI as educational tool
MeSH terms
Large Language Models, Artificial Intelligence, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Ethics, Medical, Humans, Language, Virtues

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review