Cited by 19Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Culture and personal influences on cardiopulmonary resuscitation- results of international survey

Open access
Ozer, Janet, Alon, Gadi, Leykin, Dmitry, Varon, Joseph, Aharonson-Daniel, Limor, Einav, Sharon·2019·BMC Medical Ethics

Abstract

Background: The ethical principle of justice demands that resources be distributed equally and based on evidence. Guidelines regarding forgoing of CPR are unavailable and there is large variance in the reported rates of attempted CPR in in-hospital cardiac arrest. The main objective of this work was to study whether local culture and physician preferences may affect spur-of-the-moment decisions in unexpected in-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods: Cross sectional questionnaire survey conducted among a convenience sample of physicians that likely comprise code team members in their country (Indonesia, Israel and Mexico). The questionnaire included details regarding respondent demographics and training, personal value judgments and preferences as well as professional experience regarding CPR and forgoing of resuscitation. Results: Of the 675 questionnaires distributed, 617 (91.4%) were completed and returned. Country of practice and level of knowledge about resuscitation were strongly associated with avoiding CPR performance. Mexican physicians were almost twicemore likely to forgo CPR than their Israeli and Indonesian/Malaysian counterparts [OR1.84 (95% CI 1.03, 3.26), p = 0.038]. Mexican responders also placed greater emphasison personal and patient quality of life (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, degree of religiosity was most strongly associated with willingness to forgo CPR; orthodox respondents were more than twice more likely to report having forgone CPR for apatient they do not know than secular and observant respondents, regardless of the country of practice [OR 2.12 (95%CI 1.30, 3.46), p = 0.003]. Conclusions: In unexpected in-hospital cardiac arrest the decision to perform or withhold CPR may be affected by physician knowledge and local culture as well as personal preferences. Physician CPR training should include information regarding predictors of patient outcome at as well as emphasis on differentiating between patient and personal preferences in an emergency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12910-019-0439-x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decisions within the healthcare service delivery system are often based on physicians' own opinions.

    “The decisions within the healthcare service delivery system are often based on the physicians’ own opinions. 16”

    From Artificial Intelligence and Decision-Making in Healthcare: A Thematic Analysis of a Systematic Review of Reviews (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Discussion says that, in the countries studied, most physicians rely on their own judgment when making decisions about CPR without advance directives. The Methods specify that the study examined decisions not to begin resuscitation for an unfamiliar patient. This supports the claim for that clinical situation, but not its broader assertion about decisions throughout healthcare service delivery. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]Edin MG Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the frail elderly: clinical, ethical and halakhic issues Isr Med Assoc J 2007 9 3 177 179 17402332

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ozer, J., Alon, G., Leykin, D., Varon, J., Aharonson-Daniel, L., & Einav, S.
Affiliations
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Ozer, Janet
Venue
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2019-12
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
102-102
ISSN
1472-6939 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2997168785
Cited by
19
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Ethics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
cardiopulmonary resuscitation, in-hospital cardiac arrest, physician preferences, religiosity, cultural influence, quality of life, CPR training, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Culture, Female, Humans, Indonesia, Israel, Male, Mexico, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Logistic Models, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review