Epidemiology and outcome of cardiac arrests reported in the lay-press: an observational study
Open accessAbstract
Objective The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency with which cardiac arrests are reported in newspapers, assess the level of detail reported and ascertain whether this coverage gives a realistic portrayal of cardiac arrest outcomes to the lay-reader. Design Observational study. Setting All UK newspaper articles published between 1 January 2010 and 30 June 2010. Participants Articles containing the words 'cardiac arrest', 'CPR' or 'resuscitation' were screen for eligibility. Any articles not involving reference to a real cardiac arrest were excluded. Main outcome measures Data relating to patient demographics, arrest characteristics, treatment (CPR and defibrillation) and survival using the Utstein template were extracted. The results were then compared with cardiac arrest statistics from epidemiological studies. Results Six hundred and forty-eight articles were reviewed, 203 of which referred to individual cardiac arrest events; 22 events occurred in-hospital and 181 occurred out-of-hospital. In the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) group 32 (17.7%) were reported to survive to hospital discharge, almost all with good neurological outcome. The median age group was 31-45-year-olds, 52 (28.7%) were women and 40 were children. Seventy-five percent of victims received bystander CPR with 13 being attended to by lay-responders using AEDs, eight of which presented with a shockable rhythm of which six made a full recovery. Conclusion Survival to hospital discharge ra…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A patient-centred advance care planning approach increases congruence in decision-making for future medical treatment between patients and their surrogate, improves satisfaction with the decision-making process, and decreases decisional conflict.
“A patient-centred advance care planning approach increases the congruence in decision-making for future medical treatment between patients and their surrogate, improves satisfaction with the decision-making process and decreases the decisional conflict. 269”
From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [269]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions
Mentzelopoulos, S. D., Couper, K., Voorde, P. V. D., Druwé, P., Blom, M., Perkins, G. D., Lulic, I., Djakow, J., Raffay, V., Lilja, G., et al. (2021) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.017 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citationDo-not-attempt-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation decisions: an evidence synthesis
Perkins, G. D., Griffiths, F., Slowther, A.-M., George, R., Fritz, Z., Satherley, P., Williams, B., Waugh, N., Cooke, M. W., Chambers, S., et al. (2016) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr04110 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationFreeman, K., Field, R. A., & Perkins, G. D. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006517 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationCulture and personal influences on cardiopulmonary resuscitation- results of international survey
Ozer, J., Alon, G., Leykin, D., Varon, J., Aharonson-Daniel, L., & Einav, S. (2019) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-019-0439-x · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Recommended summary plan for emergency care and treatment: ReSPECT a mixed-methods study
Perkins, G. D., Hawkes, C. A., Eli, K., Griffin, J., Jacques, C., Huxley, C. J., Couper, K., Ochieng, C., Fuld, J., Fritz, Z., et al. (2022) · Health and Social Care Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/lfpe3627 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Field, R. A., Soar, J., Nolan, J. P., & Perkins, G. D.
- Affiliations
- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Southmead Hospital (GB)
- Royal United Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Field, Richard A
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 525-531
- ISSN
- 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1095
- PMC
- PMC3241513
- OpenAlex
- W2114914691
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Keywords
- cardiac arrest, media coverage, newspaper reports, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, survival to hospital discharge, neurological outcome, bystander CPR, automated external defibrillators, resuscitation, Utstein template
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Newspapers as Topic, Patient Discharge, Professional Competence, Resuscitation, Survival Rate, Epidemiologic Studies, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Health Care Surveys, Access to Information, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review