Cited by 23Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesJournalism and Media Studies

Epidemiology and outcome of cardiac arrests reported in the lay-press: an observational study

Open access
Field, Richard A, Soar, Jasmeet, Nolan, Jerry P, Perkins, Gavin D·2011·Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Abstract

Objective The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency with which cardiac arrests are reported in newspapers, assess the level of detail reported and ascertain whether this coverage gives a realistic portrayal of cardiac arrest outcomes to the lay-reader. Design Observational study. Setting All UK newspaper articles published between 1 January 2010 and 30 June 2010. Participants Articles containing the words 'cardiac arrest', 'CPR' or 'resuscitation' were screen for eligibility. Any articles not involving reference to a real cardiac arrest were excluded. Main outcome measures Data relating to patient demographics, arrest characteristics, treatment (CPR and defibrillation) and survival using the Utstein template were extracted. The results were then compared with cardiac arrest statistics from epidemiological studies. Results Six hundred and forty-eight articles were reviewed, 203 of which referred to individual cardiac arrest events; 22 events occurred in-hospital and 181 occurred out-of-hospital. In the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) group 32 (17.7%) were reported to survive to hospital discharge, almost all with good neurological outcome. The median age group was 31-45-year-olds, 52 (28.7%) were women and 40 were children. Seventy-five percent of victims received bystander CPR with 13 being attended to by lay-responders using AEDs, eight of which presented with a shockable rhythm of which six made a full recovery. Conclusion Survival to hospital discharge ra…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110228

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A patient-centred advance care planning approach increases congruence in decision-making for future medical treatment between patients and their surrogate, improves satisfaction with the decision-making process, and decreases decisional conflict.

    “A patient-centred advance care planning approach increases the congruence in decision-making for future medical treatment between patients and their surrogate, improves satisfaction with the decision-making process and decreases the decisional conflict. 269”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Field, R. A., Soar, J., Nolan, J. P., & Perkins, G. D.
Affiliations
  • Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Southmead Hospital (GB)
  • Royal United Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Field, Richard A
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Published
2011-12
Volume
104
Issue
12
Pages
525-531
ISSN
  • 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1095
OpenAlex
W2114914691
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
Keywords
cardiac arrest, media coverage, newspaper reports, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, survival to hospital discharge, neurological outcome, bystander CPR, automated external defibrillators, resuscitation, Utstein template
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Newspapers as Topic, Patient Discharge, Professional Competence, Resuscitation, Survival Rate, Epidemiologic Studies, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Health Care Surveys, Access to Information, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review