Free establishment of primary health care providers: effects on geographical equity
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A reform in 2010 in Swedish primary care made it possible for private primary care providers to establish themselves freely in the country. In the former, publicly planned system, location was strictly regulated by local authorities. The goal of the new reform was to increase access and quality of health care. Critical arguments were raised that the reform could have detrimental effects on equity if the new primary health care providers chose to establish foremost in socioeconomically prosperous areas. The aim of this study is to examine how the primary care choice reform has affected geographical equity by analysing patterns of establishment on the part of new private providers. METHODS: The basis of the design was to analyse socio-economic data on individuals who reside in the same electoral areas in which the 1411 primary health care centres in Sweden are established. Since the primary health care centres are located within 21 different county councils with different reimbursement schemes, we controlled for possible cluster effects utilizing generalized estimating equations modelling. The empirical material used in the analysis is a cross-sectional data set containing socio-economic data of the geographical areas in which all primary health care centres are established. RESULTS: When controlling for the effects of the county council regulation, primary health care centres established after the primary care choice reform were found to be located in areas with significantly fewer older adults living alone as well as fewer single parents - groups which generally have lower socio-economic status and high health care needs. However, no significant effects were observed for other socio-economic variables such as mean income, percentage of immigrants, education, unemployment, and children <5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The primary care choice reform seems to have had some negative effects on geographical equity, even though these seem relatively minor.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Arcury, T. A., Gesler, W. M., Preisser, J. S., Sherman, J., Spencer, J., & Perin, J. (2005) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00346.x · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Universalism in Welfare Policy: The Swedish Case beyond 1990
Blomqvist, P., & Palme, J. (2020) · Social Inclusion · doi:10.17645/si.v8i1.2511 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Isaksson, D., Blomqvist, P., & Winblad, U.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Isaksson, David
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-28
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4724405
- OpenAlex
- W2256596303
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 12.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
- Uppsala Universitet
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Keywords
- primary health centers, socioeconomic status, elderly living alone, single parents, health care access, Sweden
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Choice Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Geography, Health Personnel, Humans, Income, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Sweden, Healthcare Disparities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review