Cited by 594Public Health and Social InequalitiesHealthcare Policy and ManagementHealth disparities and outcomes

The Effects of Geography and Spatial Behavior on Health Care Utilization among the Residents of a Rural Region

Open access
Arcury, Thomas A., Gesler, Wilbert M., Preisser, John S., Sherman, Jill, Spencer, John, Perin, Jamie·2005·Health Services Research

Abstract

Objective.This analysis determines the importance of geography and spatial behavior as predisposing and enabling factors in rural health care utilization, controlling for demographic, social, cultural, and health status factors. Data Sources.A survey of 1,059 adults in 12 rural Appalachian North Carolina counties. Study Design.This cross‐sectional study used a three‐stage sampling design stratified by county and ethnicity. Preliminary analysis of health services utilization compared weighted proportions of number of health care visits in the previous 12 months for regular check‐up care, chronic care, and acute care across geographic, sociodemographic, cultural, and health variables. Multivariable logistic models identified independent correlates of health services utilization. Data Collection Methods.Respondents answered standard survey questions. They located places in which they engaged health related and normal day‐to‐day activities; these data were entered into a geographic information system for analysis. Principal Findings.Several geographic and spatial behavior factors, including having a driver's license, use of provided rides, and distance for regular care, were significantly related to health care utilization for regular check‐up and chronic care in the bivariate analysis. In the multivariate model, having a driver's license and distance for regular care remained significant, as did several predisposing (age, gender, ethnicity), enabling (household income), and need (physical and mental health measures, number of conditions). Geographic measures, as predisposing and enabling factors, were related to regular check‐up and chronic care, but not to acute care visits. Conclusions.These results show the importance of geographic and spatial behavior factors in rural health care utilization. They also indicate continuing inequity in rural health care utilization that must be addressed in public policy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00346.x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brief interventions can be more accessible than multiweek interventions, particularly for individuals from rural communities.

    “and can be more accessible than multiweek interventions, particularly for individuals from rural communities [34].”

    From A novel two-day intervention reduces stress in caregivers of persons with dementia (2018) · cites this paper as [34]

    The paper’s background discussion (page not provided) says rural residents often travel farther for care and face transportation barriers, supporting the claim’s concern about accessibility in rural communities. It does not compare brief with multiweek interventions or establish that brief interventions are more accessible. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Pearsall, M. 1960. ''Healthways in a Mountain County.'' Mountain Life and Work 36 (4): 7-13.
  2. Plaut, T. 1988. ''Cross-Cultural Conflict between Providers and Clients and Staff Members.'' In Appalachian Mental Health, edited by S. E. Keefe, pp 161-74. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
  3. Ricketts, T. C. 1999. ''Preface.'' In Rural Health in the United States, edited by T. C. Ricketts, pp vii-viii. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arcury, T. A., Gesler, W. M., Preisser, J. S., Sherman, J., Spencer, J., & Perin, J.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Arcury, Thomas A.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01-21
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
135-156
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2127606804
Cited by
594
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 35
FWCI
15.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01 HS009624, R01 HS09624)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
spatial behavior, geographical factors, rural health disparities, driving licence, distance to care, chronic care, acute care, household income, physical and mental health, health care access
MeSH terms
Adult, Appalachian Region, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Geography, Health Services Accessibility, Health Status, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, North Carolina, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Residence Characteristics, Spatial Behavior, Transportation, Health Behavior, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Rural Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review