Embedding new technologies in practice – a normalization process theory study of point of care testing
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Many point of care diagnostic technologies are available which produce results within minutes, and offer the opportunity to deliver acute care out of hospital settings. Increasing access to diagnostics at the point of care could increase the volume and scope of acute ambulatory care. Yet these technologies are not routinely used in many settings. We aimed to explore how point of care testing is used in a setting where it has become 'normalized' (embedded in everyday practice), in order to inform future adoption and implementation in other settings. We used normalization process theory to guide our case study approach. METHODS: We used a single case study design, choosing a community based ambulatory care unit where point of care testing is used routinely. A focused ethnographic approach was taken, including non-participant observation of all activities related to point of care testing, and semi-structured interviews, with all clinical staff involved in point of care testing at the unit. Data were analysed thematically, guided by normalization process theory. RESULTS: Fourteen days of observation and six interviews were completed. Staff had a shared understanding of the purpose, value and benefits of point of care testing, believing it to be integral to the running of the unit. They organised themselves as a team to ensure that point of care testing worked effectively; and one key individual led a change in practice to ensure more consistency and trust in procedures. Staff assessed point of care testing as worthwhile for the unit, their patients, and themselves in terms of job satisfaction and knowledge. Potential barriers to adoption of point of care testing were evident (including lack of trust in the accuracy of some results compared to laboratory testing; and lack of ease of use of some aspects of the equipment); but these did not prevent point of care testing from becoming embedded, because the importance and value attributed to it were so strong. CONCLUSIONS: This case study offers insights into successful adoption of new diagnostic technologies into every day practice. Such analyses may be critical to realising their potential to change processes of care.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One uncontrolled study was an ethnography of a set of socio-technical practices.
“One study was an ethnography of a set of socio-technical practices [103].”
From Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review (2018) · cites this paper as [103]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
Moore, G. F., Audrey, S., Barker, M., Bond, L., Bonell, C., Hardeman, W., Moore, L., O'Cathain, A., Tinati, T., Wight, D., et al. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h1258 · Cited by 6,204 · see citing works
Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-100 · Cited by 2,697 · see citing works
Murray, E., Treweek, S., Pope, C., MacFarlane, A., Ballini, L., Dowrick, C., Finch, T., Kennedy, A., Mair, F., O'Donnell, C., et al. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-63 · Cited by 1,478 · see citing works
Pope, C., Halford, S., Turnbull, J., Prichard, J., Calestani, M., & May, C. (2013) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-111 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- [2]Price CP StJohn A Kricka LJ Point-of-care testing. Needs, opportunity, and innovation 2010 3 Washington AACC Press
- [3]Bubner TK Laurence CO Gialamas A Yelland LN Ryan P Willson KJ Tideman P Worley P Beilby JJ Effectiveness of point-of-care testing for therapeutic control of chronic conditions: results from the PoCT in General Practice Trial Med J Aust 2009 190 11 624 626 19485840
- [4]Price CP Kricka LJ Improving healthcare accessibility through point-of-care technologies Clin Chem 2007 53 9 1665 1675 10.1373/clinchem.2006.084707 17660275 · DOI
- [5]Laurence C Gialamas A Yelland L Bubner T Ryan P Willson K Glastonbury B Gill J Shephard M Beilby J A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting - rationale, design and baseline characteristics Trials 2008 9 50 10.1186/1745-6215-9-50 18681979 PMC2519057 · DOI
- [6]Cals JW Butler CC Hopstaken RM Hood K Dinant GJ Effect of point of care testing for C reactive protein and training in communication skills on antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster randomised trial BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2009 338 b1374 10.1136/bmj.b1374 PMC2677640 19416992 · DOI
- [7]Cals JW Ament AJ Hood K Butler CC Hopstaken RM Wassink GF Dinant GJ C-reactive protein point of care testing and physician communication skills training for lower respiratory tract infections in general practice: economic evaluation of a cluster randomized trial J Eval Clin Pract 2011 17 6 1059 1069 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01472.x 20666881 · DOI
- [10]Jones CH Howick J Roberts NW Price CP Heneghan C Plüddemann A Thompson M Primary care clinicians’ attitudes towards point-of-care blood testing: a systematic review of qualitative studies BMC Fam Pract 2013 14 1 117 10.1186/1471-2296-14-117 23945264 PMC3751354 · DOI
- [11]Kyratsis Y Ahmad R Holmes A Technology adoption and implementation in organisations: comparative case studies of 12 English NHS Trusts BMJ Open 2012 2 2 e000872 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000872 22492183 PMC3329608 · DOI
- [13]Robertson A, Cresswell K, Takian A, Petrakaki D, Crowe S, Cornford T, Barber N, Avery A, Fernando B, Jacklin A. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2010;341:c4564. PMC2933355 20813822
- [17]McEvoy R, Ballini L, Maltoni S, O’Donnell CA, Mair FS, MacFarlane A. A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes. Implementation Science. 2014;9(2). doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-2. PMC3905960 24383661 · DOI · Paper page
- [18]Sanders T Foster NE Ong BN Perceptions of general practitioners towards the use of a new system for treating back pain: a qualitative interview study BMC Med 2011 9 1 49 10.1186/1741-7015-9-49 21554696 PMC3098180 · DOI
- [19]Coupe N Anderson E Gask L Sykes P Richards DA Chew-Graham C Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory BMC Fam Pract 2014 15 1 78 10.1186/1471-2296-15-78 24885746 PMC4030004 · DOI
- [22]Yin R Case study research: design and methods (5th ed.) 2014 USA Sage Publications, Inc
- [24]Wind G Negotiated interactive observation: Doing fieldwork in hospital settings Anthropology and Medicine 2008 15 2 79 89 10.1080/13648470802127098 27269225 · DOI
- [25]Stone MA Burden AC Burden M Baker R Khunti K Near patient testing for glycated haemoglobin in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus managed in primary care: acceptability and satisfaction Diabet Med 2007 24 7 792 795 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02175.x 17451419 · DOI
- [26]Ivaska L Niemelä J Leino P Mertsola J Peltola V Accuracy and Feasibility of Point-Of-Care White Blood Cell Count and C-Reactive Protein Measurements at the Pediatric Emergency Department PLoS One 2015 10 6 e0129920 10.1371/journal.pone.0129920 26034987 PMC4452774 · DOI
- [27]Cals JW Chappin FH Hopstaken RM van Leeuwen ME Hood K Butler CC Dinant GJ C-reactive protein point-of-care testing for lower respiratory tract infections: a qualitative evaluation of experiences by GPs Fam Pract 2010 27 2 212 218 10.1093/fampra/cmp088 20022909 · DOI
- [28]Wood F Brookes-Howell L Hood K Cooper L Verheij T Goossens H Little P Godycki-Cwirko M Adriaenssens N Jakobsen K A multi-country qualitative study of clinicians' and patients' views on point of care tests for lower respiratory tract infection Fam Pract 2011 28 6 661 669 10.1093/fampra/cmr031 21653924 · DOI
- [29]Moynihan R Doust J Henry D Preventing overdiagnosis: how to stop harming the healthy BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2012 344 e350 10.1136/bmj.e350 22645185 · DOI
- [30]Drain PK Hyle EP Noubary F Freedberg KA Wilson D Bishai WR Rodriguez W Bassett IV Diagnostic point-of-care tests in resource-limited settings Lancet Infect Dis 2014 14 239 249 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70250-0 24332389 PMC4016042 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
May, C. R., Cummings, A., Girling, M., Bracher, M., Mair, F. S., May, C. M., Murray, E., Myall, M., Rapley, T., & Finch, T. (2018) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0758-1 · Cited by 683 · see citing works
“One study was an ethnography of a set of socio-technical practices [103].”
Background
- Authors
- Jones, C. H. D., Glogowska, M., Locock, L., & Lasserson, D. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Caroline H. D.
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2016-10-19
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 591-591
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5070078
- OpenAlex
- W2538443375
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 8.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health Research (GB) (Diagnostic Evidence Cooperative Oxford)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Keywords
- point-of-care testing, Normalization Process Theory, technology adoption, outpatient care, community-based care, clinical staff perceptions, barriers to adoption, ease of use
- MeSH terms
- Point-of-Care Testing, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Models, Theoretical, Qualitative Research, Translational Research, Biomedical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review