The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characteristics of successful changes in health care organizations: an interview study with physicians, registered nurses and assistant nurses
Open accessAbstract
Background: Health care organizations are constantly changing as a result of technological advancements, ageing populations, changing disease patterns, new discoveries for the treatment of diseases and political reforms and policy initiatives. Changes can be challenging because they contradict humans’ basic need for a stable environment. The present study poses the question: what characterizes successful organizational changes in health care? The aim was to investigate the characteristics of changes of relevance for the work of health care professionals that they deemed successful. Methods: The study was based on semi-structured interviews with 30 health care professionals: 11 physicians, 12 registered nurses and seven assistant nurses employed in the Swedish health care system. An inductive approach was applied using questions based on the existing literature on organizational change and change responses. The questions concerned the interviewees’ experiences and perceptions of any changes that they considered to have affected their work, regardless of whether these changes were “objectively” large or small changes. The interviewees’ responses were analysed using directed content analysis. Results: The analysis yielded three categories concerning characteristics of successful changes: having the opportunity to influence the change; being prepared for the change; valuing the change. The interviewees emphasized the importance of having the opportunity to influence the organizational changes that are implemented. Changes that were initiated by the professionals themselves were considered the easiest and were rarely resisted. Changes that were clearly communicated to allow for preparation increased the chances for success. The interviewees did not support organizational changes that were perceived to be implemented unexpectedly and/or without prior communication. They conveyed that it was important for them to understand the need for and benefits of organizational changes. They particularly valued and perceived as successful organizational changes with a patient focus, with clear benefits to patients. Conclusions: Organizational changes in health care are more likely to succeed when health care professionals have the opportunity to influence the change, feel prepared for the change and recognize the value of the change, including perceiving the benefit of the change for patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305276687 · Cited by 44,601
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732315617444 · Cited by 12,703
Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004) · OUP Catalogue · Cited by 3,535
WHY PEOPLE STAY: USING JOB EMBEDDEDNESS TO PREDICT VOLUNTARY TURNOVER.
Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069391 · Cited by 3,218
Professionalism: The Third Logic
Seron, C., & Freidson, E. (2002) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/3090041 · Cited by 2,921
The Professionalization of Everyone?
Wilensky, H. L. (1964) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/223790 · Cited by 2,381
A theory of organizational readiness for change
Weiner, B. J. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-67 · Cited by 2,268
Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199268481.001.0001 · Cited by 1,868
Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609104803 · Cited by 1,821
Implementation and Public Policy
Goggin, M. L., Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1984) · CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · doi:10.2307/3330197 · Cited by 1,269
Cited by
Sommer, D., Schmidbauer, L., & Wahl, F. (2024) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-024-01884-2 · Cited by 91
Dyb, K., Berntsen, G. R., & Kvam, L. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06262-1 · Cited by 67
O'Reilly, D., McGrath, J., & Martin-Loeches, I. (2024) · Journal of Intensive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jointm.2023.10.001 · Cited by 55
Varsi, C., Ledel Solem, I. K., Eide, H., Børøsund, E., Kristjansdottir, O. B., Heldal, K., Waxenberg, L. B., Weiss, K. E., Schreurs, K. M. G., Morrison, E. J., et al. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06278-7 · Cited by 53
Held, L. A., Wewetzer, L., & Steinhäuser, J. (2022) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/14604582221112816 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Nilsen, P., Seing, I., Ericsson, C., Birken, S. A., & Schildmeijer, K.
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2020-02-27
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-147
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3012598449
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 32.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characteristics of successful changes in health care organizations: an interview study with physicians, registered nurses and assistant nurses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12913-020-4999-8
- The paper
- Nilsen, P., Seing, I., Ericsson, C., Birken, S. A., & Schildmeijer, K. (2020). Characteristics of successful changes in health care organizations: an interview study with physicians, registered nurses and assistant nurses. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4999-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.