Cited by 7Primary Care and Health OutcomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchChronic Disease Management Strategies

Associations of GP practice characteristics with the rate of ambulatory care sensitive conditions in people living with dementia in England: An ecological analysis of routine data

Open access
Eyles, Emily, Redaniel, Maria Theresa, Purdy, Sarah, Tilling, Kate, Ben-Shlomo, Yoav·2021·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital admissions for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs) are potentially avoidable. Dementia is one of the leading chronic conditions in terms of variability in ACSC admissions by general practice, as well as accounting for around a third of UK emergency admissions. METHODS: Using Bayesian multilevel linear regression models, we examined the ecological association of organizational characteristics of general practices (ACSC n=7076, non-ACSC n=7046 units) and Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG n=212 units) in relation to ACSC and non-ACSC admissions for people with dementia in England. RESULTS: The rate of hospital admissions are variable between GP practices, with deprivation and being admitted from home as risk factors for admission for ACSC and non-ACSC admissions. The budget allocated by the CCG to mental health shows diverging effects for ACSC versus non-ACSC admissions, so it is likely there is some geographic variation. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of factors that could explain avoidable admissions for PWD at the practice level were examined; most were equally predictive for avoidable and non-avoidable admissions. However, a high amount of variation found at the practice level, in conjunction with the diverging effects of the CCG mental health budget, implies that guidance may be applied inconsistently, or local services may have differences in referral criteria. This indicates there is potential scope for improvement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-021-06634-7

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inconsistent referral criteria and service availability across geographical regions contributed to inequitable access to transitional care support.

    “Furthermore, studies highlighted that inconsistent referral criteria and service availability across geographical regions contributed to inequitable access to transitional care support (de Vries et al., 2019; Eyles et al., 2021; Jennings et al., 2020; Kupeli et al., 2019; Parker et al., 2021; Pond et al., 2019).”

    From Mind the gap: a systematic review of barriers, facilitators, and experiences of care transitions for people living with dementia and their informal caregivers. (2026) · cites this paper as Eyles et al., 2021

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) suggest that guidance may be applied inconsistently and that local referral guidance and services may vary; they also note unexplained geographical differences in avoidable admissions for people with dementia. The paper does not establish that those differences caused inequitable access to transitional care support. It studies hospital admissions, and its explanation for the variation is tentative. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • People from lower-income backgrounds and rural regions faced greater barriers to continuous primary care and specialist services.

    “People from lower-income backgrounds and rural regions faced greater barriers to continuous primary care and specialist services (Brooks et al., 2022a; Eyles et al., 2021).”

    From Mind the gap: a systematic review of barriers, facilitators, and experiences of care transitions for people living with dementia and their informal caregivers. (2026) · cites this paper as Eyles et al., 2021

    The Discussion (page not available) links higher area deprivation to more hospital admissions among people living with dementia, but does not establish that lower-income people faced greater barriers to continuous primary care or specialist services. The Background names poor continuity and rurality as factors affecting admissions; the Discussion reports that rurality was not linked to increased admissions in this study. The claimed rural service barriers are not supported. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eyles, E., Redaniel, M. T., Purdy, S., Tilling, K., & Ben-Shlomo, Y.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Eyles, Emily
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2021-06-29
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
613-613
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3173943200
Cited by
7
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West, United Kingdom
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
ambulatory care sensitive conditions, dementia, avoidable hospitalizations, general practice characteristics, clinical commissioning groups, socioeconomic deprivation, emergency admissions, referral criteria, regional variation in care, England
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care, Bayes Theorem, Dementia, England, Hospitalization, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review