The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards digital health equity - a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services in the COVID-19 era
Open accessAbstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has given an unprecedented boost to already increased digital health services, which can place many vulnerable groups at risk of digital exclusion. To improve the likelihood of achieving digital health equity, it is necessary to identify and address the elements that may prevent vulnerable groups from benefiting from digital health services. This study examined the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Qualitative descriptive design was utilized. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2020 and May 2021. The participants (N = 74) were older adults, migrants, mental health service users, high users of health services, and the unemployed. Qualitative content analysis with both inductive and deductive approach was used to analyze the data. Challenges related to the use of digital health services were interpreted through digital determinants of health from the Digital Health Equity Framework. Results: For most of the participants the access to digital health services was hampered by insufficient digital, and / or local language skills. The lack of support and training, poor health, as well as the lack of strong e-identification or suitable devices also prevented the access. Digital services were not perceived to be applicable for all situations or capable of replacing face-to-face services due to the poor communication in the digital environment. Fears and the lack of trust regarding digital platforms were expressed as well as concerns related to the security of the services. Contact with a health care professional was also considered less personal and more prone to misunderstandings in the digital environment than in face-to-face services. Finally, digital alternatives were not always available as desired by participants, or participants were unaware of existing digital services and their value. Conclusion: Several development needs in the implementation of digital health services were identified that could improve equal access to and benefits gained from digital services in the future. While digital health services are increasing, traditional face-to-face services will still need to be offered alongside the digital ones to ensure equal access to services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617 · cited 2×
“The data analysis included three iterative steps of data reduction, grouping, and abstraction [41].”
MethodThe Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014) · Oncology Nursing Forum · doi:10.1188/14.onf.545-547 · Cited by 3,915
eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World.
Norman, C. D., & Skinner, H. A. (2006) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9 · Cited by 2,643
Digital technology and COVID-19
Ting, D. S. W., Carin, L., Dzau, V., & Wong, T. Y. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0824-5 · Cited by 1,413
Covid-19 and Health Care’s Digital Revolution
Keesara, S., Jonas, A., & Schulman, K. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2005835 · Cited by 1,126
COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies
Beaunoyer, E., Dupéré, S., & Guitton, M. J. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424 · Cited by 1,114
Helsper, E. J. (2012) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x · Cited by 692
Crawford, A., & Serhal, E. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/19361 · Cited by 630
Xie, B., Charness, N., Fingerman, K., Kaye, J., Kim, M. T., & Khurshid, A. (2020) · Journal of Aging & Social Policy · doi:10.1080/08959420.2020.1771237 · Cited by 346
Helsper, E. J., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816634676 · Cited by 332
Cited by
Badr, J., Motulsky, A., & Denis, J.-L. (2024) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105122 · Cited by 283
Recommendations to advance digital health equity: A systematic review of qualitative studies
Wilson, S., Tolley, C., Mc Ardle, R., Lawson, L., Beswick, E., Hassan, N., Slight, R., & Slight, S. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01177-7 · Cited by 139
Boo, S., & Oh, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1234626 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaihlanen, A.-M., Virtanen, L., Buchert, U., Safarov, N., Valkonen, P., Hietapakka, L., Hörhammer, I., Kujala, S., Kouvonen, A., & Heponiemi, T.
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2022-02-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 188-188
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4211081490
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 98.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards digital health equity - a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services in the COVID-19 era. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12913-022-07584-4
- The paper
- Kaihlanen, A.-M., Virtanen, L., Buchert, U., Safarov, N., Valkonen, P., Hietapakka, L., Hörhammer, I., Kujala, S., Kouvonen, A., & Heponiemi, T. (2022). Towards digital health equity - a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services in the COVID-19 era. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07584-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.