The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A qualitative study of rural healthcare providers’ views of social, cultural, and programmatic barriers to healthcare access
Open accessAbstract
Background: Ensuring access to healthcare is a complex, multi-dimensional health challenge. Since the inception of the coronavirus pandemic, this challenge is more pressing. Some dimensions of access are difficult to quantify, namely characteristics that influence healthcare services to be both acceptable and appropriate. These link to a patient’s acceptance of services that they are to receive and ensuring appropriate fit between services and a patient’s specific healthcare needs. These dimensions of access are particularly evident in rural health systems where additional structural barriers make accessing healthcare more difficult. Thus, it is important to examine healthcare access barriers in rural-specific areas to understand their origin and implications for resolution. Methods: We used qualitative methods and a convenience sample of healthcare providers who currently practice in the rural US state of Montana. Our sample included 12 healthcare providers from diverse training backgrounds and specialties. All were decision-makers in the development or revision of patients’ treatment plans. Semi-structured interviews and content analysis were used to explore barriers–appropriateness and acceptability–to healthcare access in their patient populations. Our analysis was both deductive and inductive and focused on three analytic domains: cultural considerations, patient-provider communication, and provider-provider communication. Member checks ensured credibility and trustworthiness of our findings. Results: Five key themes emerged from analysis: 1) a friction exists between aspects of patients’ rural identities and healthcare systems; 2) facilitating access to healthcare requires application of and respect for cultural differences; 3) communication between healthcare providers is systematically fragmented; 4) time and resource constraints disproportionately harm rural health systems; and 5) profits are prioritized over addressing barriers to healthcare access in the US. Conclusions: Inadequate access to healthcare is an issue in the US, particularly in rural areas. Rural healthcare consumers compose a hard-to-reach patient population. Too few providers exist to meet population health needs, and fragmented communication impairs rural health systems’ ability to function. These issues exacerbate the difficulty of ensuring acceptable and appropriate delivery of healthcare services, which compound all other barriers to healthcare access for rural residents. Each dimension of access must be monitored to improve patient experiences and outcomes for rural Americans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine
Engel, G. L. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.847460 · Cited by 12,887
Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations
O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000388 · Cited by 12,211
Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M., & Francis, J. J. (2017) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8 · Cited by 3,938
A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232076 · Cited by 2,929
Use of Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review
Doraiswamy, S., Abraham, A., Mamtani, R., & Cheema, S. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/24087 · Cited by 698
Qualitative and Mixed Methods in Public Health
Padgett, D. (2012) · doi:10.4135/9781483384511 · Cited by 458
Coombs, N. C., Meriwether, W. E., Caringi, J., & Newcomer, S. R. (2021) · SSM - Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100847 · Cited by 333 · cited 1×
“3% of adults in the US did not have a usual source of healthcare [6].”
BackgroundAccessibility of healthcare in rural Zimbabwe: The perspective of nurses and healthcare users
Mangundu, M., Roets, L., & van Rensberg, E. J. (2020) · African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine · doi:10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2245 · Cited by 41
Symptom Diary Use and Improved Survival for Patients With Heart Failure
Park, L. G., Dracup, K., Whooley, M. A., McCulloch, C., Jin, C., Moser, D. K., Clark, R. A., Pelter, M. M., Biddle, M., & Howie Esquivel, J. (2017) · Circulation: Heart Failure · doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.117.003874 · Cited by 27
Cited by
Critical Bias in Critical Care Devices
Charpignon, M.-L., Byers, J., Cabral, S., Celi, L. A., Fernandes, C., Gallifant, J., Lough, M. E., Mlombwa, D., Moukheiber, L., Ong, B. A., et al. (2023) · Critical Care Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2023.02.005 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Coombs, N. C., Campbell, D. G., & Caringi, J.
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2022-04-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 438-438
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4223535533
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 35.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A qualitative study of rural healthcare providers’ views of social, cultural, and programmatic barriers to healthcare access. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12913-022-07829-2
- The paper
- Coombs, N. C., Campbell, D. G., & Caringi, J. (2022). A qualitative study of rural healthcare providers’ views of social, cultural, and programmatic barriers to healthcare access. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07829-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.