Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 44Global Health Workforce IssuesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesHealthcare Quality and Satisfaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Accessibility of healthcare in rural Zimbabwe: The perspective of nurses and healthcare users

Open access
Mangundu, Manenji, Roets, Lizeth, van Rensberg, Elsie Janse·2020·African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accessibility of healthcare in rural areas is globally impeded by physical, material, human, financial and managerial resources and societal barriers in the healthcare system. Developing countries like Zimbabwe are significantly affected. AIM: The aim of this article was to share the perspectives of nurses and healthcare users (HCUs) in the rural areas of Zimbabwe with regard to the accessibility of healthcare. SETTING: The study was conducted at 45 rural health facilities in Chegutu district, Mashonaland West province and Masvingo district in Masvingo province, Zimbabwe. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire (for professional nurses) and a structured interview questionnaire (for HCUs) were utilised to gather data in a cross-sectional survey. Two districts were randomly sampled from 59 districts. All nurses working in 45 public health facilities in the selected two districts, who were willing and available to participate, were included. Ninety nurses participated in the study. The HCUs were selected through a multistage sampling technique. The sample size for HCUs was calculated by using Dobson's formula, and 445 HCUs were included via convenience sampling. RESULTS: Nurses reported challenges such as work overload because of staffing shortages (55%) and the supply of necessary medical drugs that lacked consistency in both the quantity and type ordered(46.7%). The challenges faced by HCUs included long distances from villages to health facilities (86%), unaffordability of transport costs and lack of access to medical drugs (59.95%), causing them to seek assistance from traditional healers (43%). CONCLUSION: Both the nurses and HCUs perceived grave challenges regarding access to health facilities, health workers and medical drugs, all of which are bound to have an impact on the health of communities in rural Zimbabwe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2245

Cites

18 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

FIGURE 1 Distance to health facility (professional nurses: N = 90; healthcare users: N = 445).
FIGURE 1 Distance to health facility (professional nurses: N = 90; healthcare users: N = 445).CC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 2 Medical drugs’ availability at the rural health facility (professional nurses N = 86 and healthcare users N = 445).
FIGURE 2 Medical drugs’ availability at the rural health facility (professional nurses N = 86 and healthcare users N = 445).CC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 3 Systems Model (Forester 2009:6) as applied in the development of a validated strategic action plan to enhance accessibility to healthcare in rural areas.
FIGURE 3 Systems Model (Forester 2009:6) as applied in the development of a validated strategic action plan to enhance accessibility to healthcare in rural areas.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Loewenson, 2014, Training and Research Support Centre and Ministry of Health and Child Care
  2. Broni, 2014, Br J Market Stud, 2, 30
  3. Manjengwa, 2012, Understanding poverty in Zimbabwe: A sample survey in 16 Districts
  4. Nyazema, 2010, Health Educ J Developing Soc, 26, 233
  5. Nyakatawa, 2016, Int Anesth Res Soc, 123, 755
  6. Mhere, 2013, J Appl Bus Econ, 14, 63
  7. Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency, 2016, Zimbabwe Demographic Health Survey 2015 Final Report
  8. UNICEF, 2016, Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and child care budget brief
  9. Ministry of Health and Child Welfare, 2014, The national health strategy for Zimbabwe 2014–2018. Equity and quality in health: A people’s right
  10. Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency & ICF International, 2015, Zimbabwe Demographic and Health Survey 2015: Key indicators
  11. Ministry of Health and Child Welfare, 2012, Zimbabwe National integrated health facility assessment report Dec 2011 – Jan 2012
  12. Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency, 2012, Census final report 2012
  13. Godden, 2004, Sample size formulas [homepage on the Internet]
  14. Forester, 2009, Technical Report, 110
  15. Cordon, 2013, Am J Syst Sci, 2, 13
  16. Block, 2012, Health systems research and infectious diseases of poverty: From margins to mainstream [homepage on the Internet]
  17. Goodwin, 2013, Health Res Serv Admin
  18. Boerma, 2015, Tracking universal health coverage, first global monitoring report
  19. Grignon, 2014, Risk Manage Healthc Pol, 7, 91
  20. Govule, 2015, Int J Publ Health Res, 3, 254
  21. Zimbabwe Health Services Board, 2015, 2015 Report on the state of human resources for health in Zimbabwe

Cited by

See all 44

Metadata

Authors
Mangundu, M., Roets, L., & van Rensberg, E. J.
Affiliations
University of South Africa (ZA)
Corresponding author
Mangundu, Manenji
Venue
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine
Publisher
AOSIS
Published
2020-05-14
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
e1-e7
ISSN
  • 2071-2928 (ISSN-L)
  • 2071-2936
OpenAlex
W3024836116
Cited by
41
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction
Keywords
health care access, rural health, nurses' perceptions, labor shortage, drug shortages, distance to health facility, transportation costs, traditional healers, rural Zimbabwe, Chegutu District, Masvingo District
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Workforce, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurses, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rural Population, Zimbabwe, Rural Health Services, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accessibility of healthcare in rural Zimbabwe: The perspective of nurses and healthcare users. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2245
The paper
Mangundu, M., Roets, L., & van Rensberg, E. J. (2020). Accessibility of healthcare in rural Zimbabwe: The perspective of nurses and healthcare users. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2245

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.