Provider perspectives on emergency department initiation of medication assisted treatment for alcohol use disorder
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is ubiquitous and its sequelae contribute to high levels of healthcare utilization, yet AUD remains undertreated. The ED encounter represents a missed opportunity to initiate medication assisted treatment (MAT) for patients with AUD. The aims of this study are to identify barriers and facilitators to the treatment of AUD in the ED, and to design interventions to address identified barriers. Methods: Using an implementation science approach based on the Behavior Change Wheel framework, we conducted qualitative interviews with staff to interrogate their perspectives on ED initiation of AUD treatment. Subjects included physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, clinical social workers, and pharmacists. Interviews were thematically coded using both inductive and deductive approaches and constant comparative analysis. Themes were further categorized as relating to providers’ capabilities, opportunities, or motivations. Barriers were then mapped to corresponding intervention functions. Results: Facilitators at our institution included time allotted for continuing education, the availability of clinical social workers, and favorable opinions of MAT based on previous experiences implementing buprenorphine for opioid use disorder. Capability barriers included limited familiarity with naltrexone and difficulty determining which patients are candidates for therapy. Opportunity barriers included the limited supply of naltrexone and a lack of clarity as to who should introduce naltrexone and assess readiness for change. Motivation barriers included a sense of futility in treating patients with AUD and stigmas associated with alcohol use. Evidence-based interventions included multi-modal provider education, a standardized treatment algorithm and order set, selection of clinical champions, and clarification of roles among providers on the team. Conclusions: A large evidence-practice gap exists for the treatment of AUD with Naltrexone, and the ED visit is a missed opportunity for intervention. ED providers are optimistic about implementing AUD treatment in the ED but described many barriers, especially related to knowledge, clarification of roles, and stigma associated with AUD. Applying a formal implementation science approach guided by the Behavior Change Wheel allowed us to transform qualitative interview data into evidence-based interventions for the implementation of an ED-based program for the treatment of AUD.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697 · see citing works
Glanz, K., & Bishop, D. B. (2010) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103604 · Cited by 2,336 · see citing works
Glass, J. E., Hamilton, A. M., Powell, B. J., Perron, B. E., Brown, R. T., & Ilgen, M. A. (2015) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.12950 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Handley, M. A., Harleman, E., Gonzalez-Mendez, E., Stotland, N. E., Althavale, P., Fisher, L., Martinez, D., Ko, J., Sausjord, I., & Rios, C. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0426-2 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Glass, J. E., Andréasson, S., Bradley, K. A., Finn, S. W., Williams, E. C., Bakshi, A.-S., Gual, A., Heather, N., Sainz, M. T., Benegal, V., et al. (2017) · Addiction Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1186/s13722-017-0079-8 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Philippine, T., Forsgren, E., DeWitt, C., Carter, I., McCollough, M., & Taira, B. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Philippine, Thibault
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2022-04-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 456-456
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8988541
- OpenAlex
- W4226116306
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Keywords
- alcoholism, medication-assisted treatment, naltrexone, emergency department, barriers to treatment, provider perspectives, implementation science, Behaviour Change Wheel, stigma, provider education, clinical champions
- MeSH terms
- Alcoholism, Buprenorphine, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Naltrexone, Opioid-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review