Cited by 6Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyHomelessness and Social IssuesHIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence of tuberculosis treatment outcomes among people experiencing homelessness: a scoping review

Open access

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis is an infectious, preventable and treatable disease that is socially determined. People experiencing homelessness represent a group that is highly vulnerable to this disease, presenting a challenge for its control and elimination. The aim of this review was to synthesize the existing scientific evidence on the outcomes of tuberculosis treatment in the context of the population experiencing homelessness. Methods: This scoping review was conducted following JBI guidelines. Six databases were consulted: MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS, CINAHL and EMBASE. Scientific literature with quantitative or mixed-method approaches may be included, published from 2015 onward, in English, Portuguese and Spanish, involving participants aged 15 years or older. The Rayyan application was used to facilitate the selection process, and a descriptive analysis of the findings was performed. Results: Fourteen articles were included, comprising primarily cohort studies (n= 6) and cross-sectional studies (n= 5), along with two ecological studies and a systematic review. Eight articles were from South America (seven from Brazil), three from Europe and three from Asia. The rates of treatment success outcomes ranged from 89.7% to less than 30%, with nine studies reporting rates under 45%. The highest proportion of accumulated unsuccessful treatment outcomes was nearly 70%, with four studies indicating rates between 60% and 66%. Loss to follow-up was the most frequently reported negative outcome (n= 9), reaching rates of 53.6%. The “failed” treatment outcome was reported in low proportions, often less than 1% (n= 5) and “not evaluated” outcome was reported in half of the studies (n= 7). The proportions observed in the systematic review were consistent with these findings. Furthermore, the results revealed significant differences compared with those of the global general population. While both groups exhibited low proportions of treatment failures, other outcomes for the homeless population were markedly poorer. Conclusions: The homeless population experiences low success rates in tuberculosis treatment, with no study in this review meeting the international treatment success rate target. A comprehensive, collaborative and patient-centered care approach that addresses social determination of health is essential to improve outcomes and enhance health, social care, and educational services tailored to the needs of this population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-025-12230-w

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For people experiencing homelessness, community- and outreach-based delivery-such as nurse-community-health-worker teams that meet patients in shelters or on the street-has been shown to improve engagement with TB and latent TB infection treatment while also reducing drug use.

    “For people experiencing homelessness, community- and outreach-based delivery—such as nurse–community-health-worker teams that meet patients in shelters or on the street—has been shown to improve engagement with TB and latent TB infection treatment while also reducing drug use [44,45].”

    From Psychosocial Interventions for Improving Treatment Adherence in Tuberculosis Patients: A Scoping Review of Evidence-Based Approaches. (2026) · cites this paper as [45]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Guerrero, C. S. P., Oliveira, T. A. C., Bernardi, W. O. B., Ribeiro, S., Stacciarini, J.-M., Monroe, A. A., Fernandes, H., & Hino, P.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Guerrero, Claudia Susana Pérez
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2025-04-02
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
497-497
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409126805
Cited by
6
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (OO1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › HIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology
Keywords
tuberculosis, homelessness, tuberculosis treatment outcomes, treatment success rate, treatment failure, loss to follow-up, social determinants of health, vulnerable populations, patient-centered care
MeSH terms
Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Tuberculosis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review