Cited by 0Global Health Workforce IssuesHealth and Conflict StudiesGlobal Health and Surgery

Healing after war/conflict: transformative health workforce strategies for a resilient future: a systematic scoping review

Open access
Gebreyesus, Aregawi, Gebremariam, Tesfay Brhane, Tequare, Mengistu Hagazi, Kidane, Samuel, Tsadik, Mache, Gebregziabher, Measho Gebreslassie, Gebremichael, Mengistu Welday, Gebremeskel, Leake +4 more·2026·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human resources for health (HRH) are critical for effective healthcare delivery, particularly in post-conflict settings where health systems face severe challenges. Post-conflict environments often exacerbate pre-existing HRH challenges, such as shortages, poor working conditions, and limited training opportunities. This scoping review aims to identify and synthesize evidence on interventions addressing HRH in post-conflict settings, highlighting strategies, outcomes, and barriers to their implementation. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) and grey literature sources, including WHO and ReBUILD Consortium reports. Inclusion criteria encompassed quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies, reviews, and guidelines focused on HRH interventions in post-conflict settings published since 1990. Data were charted and analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework to identify key themes, interventions, and outcomes. RESULTS: The review included 14 studies, comprising primary research and systematic, scoping, and narrative reviews. Key interventions identified include recruitment and deployment strategies, capacity-building programs, incentive schemes, and retention mechanisms. Case studies from Sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East highlighted innovative policies, such as community-based recruitment and accelerated training programs. Barriers to implementation included political instability, lack of funding, and uncoordinated efforts among stakeholders. Successful initiatives involved long-term planning, local community engagement, and integration with broader health system recovery strategies. CONCLUSION: Effective HRH interventions in post-conflict settings require comprehensive planning, coordination among stakeholders, and sustained investment. Policies should prioritize retention, capacity building, and equitable deployment to rebuild resilient health systems. These findings provide a roadmap for policymakers and practitioners to enhance HRH recovery efforts in similar contexts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-026-15180-z

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

  • Development Consequences of Armed Conflict

    Gates, S., Hegre, H., Nygård, H. M., & Strand, H. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.04.031 · Cited by 377 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “However, the effectiveness of these new policies is often undermined by significant implementation challenges, including political interference, nepotism, and a lack of centralized coordination among NGOs and aid agencies, leading to fragmented performance management systems [19, 28, 31].”

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Gebreyesus, A., Gebremariam, T. B., Tequare, M. H., Kidane, S., Tsadik, M., Gebregziabher, M. G., Gebremichael, M. W., Gebremeskel, L., Mruts, K. B., Woldegiorgis, M., Haregu, T., & Teklu, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Mekelle University (ET)
  • Debre Berhan University (ET)
Corresponding author
Gebreyesus, Aregawi
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-07-18
Volume
26
Issue
1
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7169676869
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
MERQ Consultancy LLC
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
Keywords
human resources for health, post-conflict health systems, healthcare workers, health workforce recruitment, health workforce retention, capacity building, incentive mechanisms, health workforce deployment, health system recovery, community-based recruitment, political instability, health workforce policy
MeSH terms
Public Health Infrastructure, Delivery of Health Care, Health Workforce, Humans, Warfare, Capacity Building

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review