Cited by 34Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsAnimal Behavior and ReproductionReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species

Naked mole-rat transcriptome signatures of socially suppressed sexual maturation and links of reproduction to aging

Open access
Bens, Martin, Szafranski, Karol, Holtze, Susanne, Sahm, Arne, Groth, Marco, Kestler, Hans A., Hildebrandt, Thomas B., Platzer, Matthias·2018·BMC Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Naked mole-rats (NMRs) are eusocially organized in colonies. Although breeders carry the additional metabolic load of reproduction, they are extremely long-lived and remain fertile throughout their lifespan. This phenomenon contrasts the disposable soma theory of aging stating that organisms can invest their resources either in somatic maintenance, enabling a longer lifespan, or in reproduction, at the cost of longevity. Here, we present a comparative transcriptome analysis of breeders vs. non-breeders of the eusocial, long-lived NMR vs. the polygynous and shorter-lived guinea pig (GP). RESULTS: Comparative transcriptome analysis of tissue samples from ten organs showed, in contrast to GPs, low levels of differentiation between sexes in adult NMR non-breeders. After transition into breeders, NMR transcriptomes are markedly sex-specific, show pronounced feedback signaling via gonadal steroids, and have similarities to reproductive phenotypes in African cichlid fish, which also exhibit social status changes between dominant and subordinate phenotypes. Further, NMRs show functional enrichment of status-related expression differences associated with aging. Lipid metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation-molecular networks known to be linked to aging-were identified among most affected gene sets. Remarkably and in contrast to GPs, transcriptome patterns associated with longevity are reinforced in NMR breeders. CONCLUSION: Our results provide comprehensive and unbiased molecular insights into interspecies differences between NMRs and GPs, both in sexual maturation and in the impact of reproduction on longevity. We present molecular evidence that sexual maturation in NMRs is socially suppressed. In agreement with evolutionary theories of aging in eusocial organisms, we have identified transcriptome patterns in NMR breeders that-in contrast to the disposable soma theory of aging-may slow down aging rates and potentially contribute to their exceptional long life- and healthspan.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12915-018-0546-z

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bens, M., Szafranski, K., Holtze, S., Sahm, A., Groth, M., Kestler, H. A., Hildebrandt, T. B., & Platzer, M.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI) (DE)
  • Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (DE)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
Bens, Martin
Venue
BMC Biology
Published
2018-08-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
77-77
ISSN
1741-7007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951489979
Cited by
34
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (PL 173/8-1)
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft through the Senatsausschusswettbewerb (SAW-2012-FLI-2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Keywords
naked mole-rat, guinea pig, eusociality, sexual maturation, longevity, aging, disposable soma theory, gonadal steroid feedback, sex-specific gene expression, social status, lipid metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, transcriptome, healthspan
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Guinea Pigs, Reproduction, Sexual Maturation, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Mole Rats, Gene Expression Profiling, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review