The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: a panel study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Policy decisions about opt-in and opt-out consent for organ donation are based on limited evidence. To fill this gap we investigated the difference between deceased and living organ donation rates in opt-in and opt-out consent systems across a 13 year period. We controlled for extensive covariates and estimated the causal effect of consent with instrumental variables analysis. METHOD: This panel study used secondary data analysis to compare organ donor and transplant rates in 48 countries that had either opt-in or opt-out consent. Organ donation data were obtained over a 13-year period between 2000 and 2012. The main outcome measures were the number of donors, number of transplants per organ and total number (deceased plus living) of kidneys and livers transplanted. The role of consent on donor and transplant rates was assessed using multilevel modeling and the causal effect estimated with instrumental variables analysis. RESULTS: Deceased donor rates (per-million population) were higher in opt-out (M = 14.24) than opt-in consent countries (M = 9.98; Β = -4.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -8.08, -0.45, P = .029). However, the number of living donors was higher in opt-in (M = 9.36) than opt-out countries (M = 5.49; B = 3.86, 95% CI = 1.16, 6.56, P = .006). Importantly, the total number of kidneys transplanted (deceased plus living) was higher in opt-out (M = 28.32) than opt-in countries (M = 22.43; B = -5.89, 95% CI = -11.60, -0.17, P = .044). Similarly, the total number of livers transplanted was higher in opt-out (M = 11.26) than opt-in countries (M = 7.53; B = -3.73, 95% CI = -7.47, 0.01, P = .051). Instrumental variables analysis suggested that the effect of opt-in versus opt-out consent on the difference between deceased and living donor rates is causal. CONCLUSIONS: While the number of deceased donors is higher than the number of living donors, opt-out consent leads to a relative increase in the total number of livers and kidneys transplanted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (2001) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.15.4.69 · Cited by 2,355
Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling
Curran, P. J., Obeidat, K., & Losardo, D. (2010) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248371003699969 · Cited by 1,246
Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091721 · Cited by 35
Cited by
Burden of liver diseases in the world
Asrani, S. K., Devarbhavi, H., Eaton, J., & Kamath, P. S. (2019) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.014 · Cited by 3,783
Global burden of liver disease: 2023 update
Devarbhavi, H., Asrani, S. K., Arab, J. P., Nartey, Y. A., Pose, E., & Kamath, P. S. (2023) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2023.03.017 · Cited by 2,267
Organ donation in the US and Europe: The supply vs demand imbalance
Lewis, A., Koukoura, A., Tsianos, G.-I., Gargavanis, A. A., Nielsen, A. A., & Vassiliadis, E. (2021) · Transplantation Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.trre.2020.100585 · Cited by 359
Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems
Arshad, A., Anderson, B., & Sharif, A. (2019) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2019.01.036 · Cited by 285
Cheetham, O. V., Thomas, M. J. C., Hadfield, J., O’Higgins, F., Mitchell, C., & Rooney, K. D. (2016) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.01.003 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Shepherd, L., O’Carroll, R. E., & Ferguson, E.
- Venue
- BMC Medicine
- Published
- 2014-09-24
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-131
- ISSN
- 1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137193245
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: a panel study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12916-014-0131-4
- The paper
- Shepherd, L., O’Carroll, R. E., & Ferguson, E. (2014). An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: a panel study. BMC Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0131-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.