Cited by 171Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceReproductive Health and ContraceptionInternational Human Rights and Reproductive Law

Risk of violence from the man involved in the pregnancy after receiving or being denied an abortion

Open access
Roberts, Sarah CM, Biggs, M Antonia, Chibber, Karuna S, Gould, Heather, Rocca, Corinne H, Foster, Diana Greene·2014·BMC Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence is common among women having abortions, with between 6% and 22% reporting recent violence from an intimate partner. Concern about violence is a reason some pregnant women decide to terminate their pregnancies. Whether risk of violence decreases after having an abortion, remains unknown. METHODS: Data are from the Turnaway Study, a prospective cohort study of women seeking abortions at 30 facilities across the U.S. Participants included women who: presented just prior to a facility's gestational age limit and received abortions (Near Limit Abortion Group, n = 452), presented just beyond the gestational limit and were denied abortions (Turnaways, n = 231), and received first trimester abortions (First Trimester Abortion Group, n = 273). Mixed effects logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between receiving versus being denied abortion and subsequent violence from the man involved in the pregnancy over 2.5 years. RESULTS: Physical violence decreased for Near Limits (adjusted odds ratios (aOR), 0.93 per month; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.90, 0.96), but not Turnaways who gave birth (P < .05 versus Near Limits). The decrease for First Trimesters was similar to Near Limits (P = .324). Psychological violence decreased for all groups (aOR, 0.97; CI 0.94, 1.00), with no differential change across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Policies restricting abortion provision may result in more women being unable to terminate unwanted pregnancies, potentially keeping them in contact with violent partners, and putting women and their children at risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12916-014-0144-z

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Turnaway Study showed that being denied a wanted abortion was associated with later financial difficulties, including poverty and food and housing insecurity, and greater likelihood of staying with an abusive partner.

    “Research from the landmark Turnaway Study, which included participants as young as 15, showed that being denied a wanted abortion was associated with later financial difficulties, including poverty and food and housing insecurity, and greater likelihood of staying with an abusive partner (Foster et al., 2022, Miller et al., 2023, Roberts et al., 2014).”

    From The role (and limits) of developmental neuroscience in determining adolescents' autonomy rights: The case for reproductive and voting rights (2024) · cites this paper as Roberts et al., 2014

    The Methods state that Turnaway Study participants were eligible from age 15, and the Discussion reports that women denied abortions were slower to end relationships with the men involved in their pregnancies. This paper does not report later poverty or food and housing insecurity; its findings concern violence and relationships, not those financial outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, S. C., Biggs, M. A., Chibber, K. S., Gould, H., Rocca, C. H., & Foster, D. G.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Biggs, M Antonia
Venue
BMC Medicine
Published
2014-09-29
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
144-144
ISSN
1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098675315
Cited by
171
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  • William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Keywords
intimate partner violence, abortion, gestational age limits, physical violence, psychological violence, unwanted pregnancy, abortion policy
MeSH terms
Abortion Applicants, Abortion, Induced, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Gestational Age, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Maternal Health Services, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Spouse Abuse, United States, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review