The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations
Open accessAbstract
Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, as well as the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as health care, public health, education, social care, etc). This summary article presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist and recommendations for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer reviewed journals as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. However, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, as there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Another strength of this study is our comprehensive modelling approach following the best practice guidance [31].”
From Economic evaluation of wearable fitness trackers versus metformin for preventing type 2 diabetes in the UK population (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The Markov model was implemented in Microsoft Excel, following best practices for health economic modelling from conceptualisation to validation [31] (See supplementary materials for CHEERS checklist).”
From Economic evaluation of wearable fitness trackers versus metformin for preventing type 2 diabetes in the UK population (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
(1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195108248.001.0001 · Cited by 7,193
Sanders, G. D., Neumann, P. J., Basu, A., Brock, D. W., Feeny, D., Krahn, M., Kuntz, K. M., Meltzer, D. O., Owens, D. K., Prosser, L. A., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.12195 · Cited by 3,069
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., & Loder, E. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002 · Cited by 1,998
Self-citationStaniszewska, S., Brett, J., Simera, I., Seers, K., Mockford, C., Goodlad, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Barber, R., Denegri, S., et al. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j3453 · Cited by 1,983
Self-citationThe Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis
Jüni, P. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.11.1054 · Cited by 1,981
Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ
Drummond, M. F., & Jefferson, T. O. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275 · Cited by 1,827
Self-citationStaniszewska, S., Brett, J., Simera, I., Seers, K., Mockford, C., Goodlad, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Barber, R., Denegri, S., et al. (2017) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2 · Cited by 1,643
Self-citationGuidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Simera, I., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217 · Cited by 1,437
Recommendations for Reporting Cost-effectiveness Analyses
Siegel, J. E. (1996) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540160061034 · Cited by 1,147
Sullivan, S., Mauskopf, J., Augustovski, F., Caro, J., Lee, K. M., Minchin, M., Orlewska, E., Penna, P., Barrios, J. R. R., & Shau, W. (2014) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291 · Cited by 1,069
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Walker DG, Wilson RF, Sharma R, et al. Best practices for conducting economic evaluations in health care: a systematic review of quality assessment tools. Agency Healthc Res Qual. 2012; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK114545/. Accessed 21 July 2021.
- Drummond M. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–450 of 450
Papaioannou, A., Ioannidis, G., Kennedy, C., Hladysh, G., Lee, J., Adachi, J. D., Cowan, D., Duarte, D., Hategan, A., Innes, A., et al. (2026) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09782-5
Fuller, G. W., Baird, J., Miller, J., Pilbery, R., Herbert, E., Keating, S., Callaghan, T., Pollard, D. J., Pandor, A., Essat, M., et al. (2025) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/alpe8857
Economic evaluation of sterilization reversal in infertility treatment: A systematic review
Chongthanadon, B., Untaaveesup, S., Kositamongkol, C., Phisalprapa, P., Panyakhamlerd, K., & Titapant, V. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0350275
Eaglestone, G., Stoner, C. R., Pacella, R., & McCrone, P. (2026) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2026.2676648
Baztami, Y., Jebrane, I., Amine, A. M., Chakara, R., Ahchouch, S., & Raissi, A. (2026) · Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1177/10781552261456738
Phan, H. T., Nguyen, B. T., Zhao, T., Phung, T. L., Keakabetse, T. R., Dinh, T. T. N., Nelson, M. R., Skinner, M., Perndt, H., & Palmer, A. J. (2026) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2026.113433
Coors, M. B., Scheibler, F., Rüffer, J. U., Wehkamp, K., Schneider, U., Schüttig, W., Geiger, F., & Sundmacher, L. (2026) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x261450971
Blurring evidence with advocacy: a systematic review of policy recommendations for net zero
Danopoulos, E., Shah, A., Schneider, C. R., & Aston, J. A. D. (2026) · npj Environmental Social Sciences · doi:10.1038/s44432-026-00012-6
Siddiqi, O. K., Jahn, B., Rochau, U., Walukaga, S., Rajasingham, R., & Siebert, U. (2026) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciag348
Flood, D., Wellmann, I. A., Ayala, L. F., Tschida, S., Chary, A. N., Donis, R., Nufio, A. I. A. A., Kilbourne, A. M., Watkins, D., Huffman, M. D., et al. (2026) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-026-00993-0
Atuhumuza, E., Atukunda, E. C., Musiimenta, A., Mugyenyi, G. R., Haberer, J. E., Obua, C., Siedner, M. J., Matthews, L. T., Bátwala, V., & Nghiem, V. T. H. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.06.10.26355347
Fever of unknown origin: cost of illness study
Lesnjak, I., Jovicic, B. P., Jovanovic, K. J., Canovic, A., Stanojković, T., Gajić, M. M., Markovic, S. N., Manojlović, A., Mijailovic, S. S., Јаnkovic, S., et al. (2026) · Open Medicine · doi:10.1515/med-2026-1409
Bailey‐Burke, C., Brizel, D. M., Ubel, P. A., Reed, S. D., & Kheterpal, M. (2026) · JID Innovations · doi:10.1016/j.xjidi.2026.100501
Decker, S. R. D. R., Etges, A. P. B. D. S., Zimerman, A., Alves, F. D., Ternes, C. M. P., Santos, J. S., Zimerman, L. I., Rohde, L. E. P., Forno, A. D., d’Avila, A., et al. (2025) · Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia · doi:10.36660/abc.20250254i
Ya, K. Z., Ku, C. W., Loy, S. L., Ngien, A., Mok, K. T., Chua, M. C., Yap, F., Chan, J. K. Y., & Martin, E. K. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116421
Andersen, K. A. A., Støme, L. N., Aas, E. M., Arnevik, E. A., Stavseth, M. R., & Rognli, E. B. (2026) · International Journal of Public Health · doi:10.3389/ijph.2026.1609386
Health economic evaluations of digital health technologies—a rapid review of applied methods
Campione, A., Zetzsche, M., Rombey, T., Rödiger, H., & Henschke, C. (2026) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2026.1816757
Xu, H., Huang, J., Bian, H., Wang, G., & Feng, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2026.1885531
Massey, H. C., Denton, H., Bibby-Jones, A.-M., Bremner, S. A., Violato, M., Burlingham, A., Cunningham, R., Hasnaoui, S., Harper, C. M., Robertson, S., et al. (2026) · NIHR Open Research · doi:10.3310/nihropenres.14073.1
Білоусова, Н. А., Mahanova, T. V., Ткаченко, Н. О., Mykhalchuk, V. M., Kozhuharyova, N., & Долженко, М. М. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9927500/v1
Saunders, S. J., Seemann, K., Muench, T., Saunders, R., Sfeir, N., Radtke, F. M., Meço, B. C., & Berger‐Estilita, J. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119140
Yuen, M., Wastlund, D., Lin, T. T. Y., Zheng, Q., Chen, J., & Ko, K. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0353882
Azandjeme, C., Houssou, G., Metonnou, C., Fanou, N., & Sossa, C. (2026) · Open Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.4236/ojpm.2026.167009
Active Transport Health Model: Valuing the Health Benefits of Active Transport
Wanjau, M. N., Moeller, H., Standen, C., Haigh, F., & Veerman, L. J. (2026) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-026-01050-6
Zakiyah, N., Iftinan, G. N., Nuraeni, S., Sinuraya, R. K., Purba, F. D., Fitria, N., Bahar, M. A., & Puspitasari, I. M. (2026) · Value in Health Regional Issues · doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2026.101676
Foni, N. O., Malheiro, D. T., Parreira, K. C. J., Accorsi, T. A. D., Moreira, F. T., Kohler, K. F., Pedrotti, C. H. S., & Wolosker, N. (2026) · SICOT-J · doi:10.1051/sicotj/2026039
Xu, H., Yu, S., Yang, Y., Bian, H., Zz, W., & Feng, X. (2026) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2026.2707849
Priority aims and testable hypotheses in implementation science: a scoping review
Riley, S. R., Aldrich, A. M., Voisin, C. E., Perin, M., Philbrick, S. M., Mungo, J., Patel, S. V., & Garner, B. R. (2026) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-026-01058-y
Costs of surgeries in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review
Ifeanyichi, M., Tenkorang, P., Matey, E., Ezeaku, C. O., Ekor, O. E., Mukoro, G. D., Bandyopadhyay, S., Lara, J. L. M., Rabiee, P., Khan, D. Z., et al. (2026) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020596
Basile, M., Valentini, I., Calosci, E. M., Sciomenta, I., Brino, E. D., Rumi, F., Barca, F., Angelis, L. D., Savastano, A., Francione, G., et al. (2026) · Ophthalmology Science · doi:10.1016/j.xops.2026.101357
Wang, S., Wang, Y., Kang, X., Fu, J., Ding, L., Zhou, H., & Fu, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2026.1915085
Xiang, Z., & Li, Z. (2026) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2026.2717970
Pitsillidou, O., Petrou, P., Milushewa, P., Pitsillidou, M., Filippou, E., & Gavan, S. P. (2026) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2026.07.009
Netto, H. P., da Silva, S. C. S. B., Fachi, M. M., Ricieri, M. C., Motta, F. D. A., Carneiro, B. H., Domino, N. R., Graf, M. E., Gonçalves, R. B., Pereira, H. S. R., et al. (2026) · Value in Health Regional Issues · doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2026.101698
Cost-neutral adoption of anti-VEGF therapies in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Pitsillidou, O., Petrou, P., & Postma, M. J. (2026) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2026.2717293
Tarride, J., Blackhouse, G., Harvey-Younis, N., Rieder, A. D., Meléndez‐Torres, G. J., Joshi, D., Demy, J., MacMillan, H. L., Attard, C., Jack, S. M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.70567
Rajah, A. S., Bello, U. L., Suberu, A., Sani, M. K., Muazu, M. H., BELLO, S. M., & Haruna, J. J. (2026) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-026-01069-9
Feng, X., Bian, H., Huang, M., Yang, Y., & Wang, G. (2026) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2026.1926275
Saran, A., Nguweneza, A., Young, S., Ojiambo, K. O., Smythe, T., & Kuper, H. (2026) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1177/18911803261489527
Health economic evaluation of health promotion and disease prevention in Germany: a scoping review
Beer, E. J., Kirschneck, M., Coenen, M., & Visscher, R. M. S. (2026) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-026-00859-0
Cost-utility analysis of pre-exposure prophylaxis rabies vaccine in 5-year-old children in Thailand
Soopairin, S., Luksameesate, P., Arthonchaikul, N., Punrin, S., Tantawichien, T., & Taychakhoonavudh, S. (2026) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2025-022168
Bontekoning, N., Groenen, H., de Jonge, S. W., Hollmann, M. W., Boermeester, M. A., Dijkgraaf, M. G. W., Wolfhagen, N., the EPO2CH Study Group, Boldingh, Q. J. J., Bom, W. J., et al. (2026) · BJS Open · doi:10.1093/bjsopen/zrag111
Almalki, Z. S., Alamer, A., Alhumaid, S., Alsuhibani, A. A., Alghamdi, B. S., Alqahtani, M. M., Alzahrani, N. S., Alghamdi, O. A., & Alanazi, H. H. (2026) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000050990
Alexandrov, N., van der Zee, D.-J., Eurlings, M. B. R. C., van Stigt, M. N., Theunissen, M., Buskens, E., van der Waaij, K. M., Gommer, E. D., Coutinho, J. M., Uyttenboogaart, M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.70634
Lichnock, Z., Subramaniam, S., Winkler, V. F., Horstick, O., Dambach, P., & Deckert, A. (2026) · BMJ Public Health · doi:10.1136/bmjph-2025-003776
Yu, S., Reardon, T. C., Ukoumunne, O. C., Njuguna, R. G., Dodd, H. F., Halliday, G., Hill, C., Jasper, B., Jones, B., Lawrence, P. J., et al. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/87123
Qiu, Z., Wang, G., Lou, Y., & Feng, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2026.1841871
Aremu, T. O., Adeyinka, K. O., Oluwole, O. E., & 임해Lim, H. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.118466
Pardey, N., Kreis, K., Leidger, A., Boettcher, J., Denecke, J., Gomes, S. S., Muntau, A. C., Daubmann, A., Ozga, A.-K., Zapf, A., et al. (2026) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-026-00883-0
Mizdrak, A., Davies, A., Cobiac, L. J., & Chambers, T. J. (2026) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1111/dar.70282
Metadata
- Authors
- Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Augustovski, F., de Bekker-Grob, E., Briggs, A. H., Carswell, C., Caulley, L., Chaiyakunapruk, N., Greenberg, D., Loder, E., Mauskopf, J., Mullins, C. D., Petrou, S., Pwu, R.-F., Staniszewska, S., & on behalf of CHEERS 2022 ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- University of York (GB)
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Springer Nature (New Zealand) (NZ)
- University of Utah (US)
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Harvard University (US)
- RTI International (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Ministry of Health and Welfare (TW)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Husereau, Don
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMC Medicine
- Published
- 2022-01-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-23
- ISSN
- 1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8753858
- OpenAlex
- W4206071468
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 125 · 2025: 160 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 9
- FWCI
- 65.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMC Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- uO Research (University of Ottawa) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0616-10103, NIHR202402)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- CHEERS 2022, health economic evaluation, reporting guidelines, reporting checklist, stakeholder engagement, patient and public involvement, health technology assessment, transparency in decision-making
- MeSH terms
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Peer Review, Checklist, Research Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
