Cited by 6Medication Adherence and ComplianceLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding the causes and consequences of low statin adherence: evidence from UK Biobank primary care data

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Statins are prescribed to lower LDL cholesterol. Clinical guidelines recommend 30–50% reduction within 3 months, yet many patients do not achieve this. We investigated predictors of LDL-c reduction, treatment adherence, and adverse clinical outcomes in a sample of UK Biobank participants. Methods: We analysed 76,000 UK Biobank participants prescribed atorvastatin or simvastatin in primary care: 41,000 had LDL-c measurements before statin initiation (median = 16 days prior, IQR = 28) and within a year of starting treatment (median = 89 days, IQR = 125). Adherence was defined as the “proportion of days covered” (PDC). We estimated associations between PDC within 1 year of statin initiation, genetic factors, post-treatment LDL-c reduction, and clinical adverse outcomes. For 13,000 patients with ≥ 3 LDL-c measures, we used inverse probability of treatment weighting methods to estimate the effect of sustained adherence intervention on LDL-c reduction longitudinally. Results: LDL-c reduction following statin initiation was predicted by time until the 1st measurement (up to 26% greater reduction if returned ≤ 3 months vs > 3 months), PDC (up to 38% reduction when PDC > 95% [high] vs. 15% when PDC < 50% [low]), and the pharmacogenetic variant SLCO1B1 *5 (lowest reduction in CC-allele: 37% versus TT-allele: 39.5%). Longitudinal causal modelling showed that the most recent PDC measure exerted the largest influence on overall LDL-c reduction, followed by the initial PDC. Genetic predictors of reduced PDC included liability to schizophrenia (Coef top 20% − 1.94, 95%CI − 2.69 to − 1.19), while genetic liability to cardiovascular diseases increased PDC (Coef top 20% 1.30, 95%CI 0.55 to 2.05). High PDC was associated with increased risk of incident iron deficiency anaemia (HR 1.30, 95%CI 1.09–1.54) and cataract (HR 1.20, 95%CI 1.07–1.34), and decreased risk of incident coronary heart disease (HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.73–0.84). Conclusions: We identify substantial variability in the time to first on-treatment LDL-c measurements and also in adherence to statin medication, highlighting a gap between NHS guidelines, LDL-c monitoring, and statin adherence. We show its subsequent impact on long-term health, demonstrating the potential effect of targeted interventions to improve adherence. We identify important predictors of reduced statin effectiveness, including pharmacogenetic variants, polygenic scores, but most of all, adherence. Tailored statin therapy strategies with patient education on statin indication and adherence could optimize treatment efficacy, safety, and long-term clinical outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12916-025-04228-2

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many patients do not achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C targets due to inadequate response, intolerance, or high residual risk.

    “many patients do not achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C targets due to inadequate response, intolerance, or high residual risk.2”

    From Small Interfering RNA for LDL-Cholesterol Reduction (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Background (page not provided) says many people with detected hypercholesterolaemia do not achieve guideline LDL-C targets. The Results (page not provided) report that only 31% of the secondary-prevention group reached the stated target. The paper discusses adherence and reduced statin effectiveness, but does not establish inadequate response, intolerance, or high residual risk as the three reasons for missing those targets. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Statins remain first-line therapy for lowering LDL-C.

    “While statins remain first-line therapy”

    From Small Interfering RNA for LDL-Cholesterol Reduction (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Background (page unavailable) says statins lower LDL-C and discusses guideline targets and follow-up after statin initiation. It does not establish that statins are first-line therapy rather than another treatment option. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(25):2982–3021. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins - PubMed. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16214597/.
  3. Virani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV, Bittner V, Brewer LC, Demeter SH, et al. AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the management of patients with chronic coronary disease: a report of the American Heart association/American college of cardiology joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2023;148(9):e9–119. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001168. · DOI
  4. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ, et al. ACC/AHA Guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140(11):e596–646. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678. · DOI
  5. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, et al. ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis. 2019;290:140–205. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Lloyd-Jones DM, Morris PB, Ballantyne CM, Birtcher KK, Covington AM, DePalma SM, et al. ACc expert consensus decision pathway on the role of nonstatin therapies for ldl-cholesterol lowering in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(14):1366–418. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (Ctt) Collaboration. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials. The Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1670–81. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Wilkinson MJ, Lepor NE, Michos ED. Evolving management of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a personalized approach to preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease across the risk continuum. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12(11). · DOI
  9. Maningat P, Gordon BR, Breslow JL. How do we improve patient compliance and adherence to long-term statin therapy? Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2013;15(1):291. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3534845/. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Rodriguez F, Maron DJ, Knowles JW, Virani SS, Lin S, Heidenreich PA. Association of statin adherence with mortality in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(3):206. · DOI
  11. Hirsh BJ, Smilowitz NR, Rosenson RS, Fuster V, Sperling LS. Utilization of and adherence to guideline-recommended lipid-lowering therapy after acute coronary syndrome: opportunities for improvement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(2):184–92. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109715024754. · DOI
  12. de Lemos JA, Blazing MA, Wiviott SD, Lewis EF, Fox KAA, White HD, et al. Early intensive vs a delayed conservative simvastatin strategy in patients with acute coronary syndromesphase z of the a to z trial. JAMA. 2004;292(11):1307–16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.11.1307. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Aubert RE, Yao J, Xia F, Garavaglia SB. Is there a relationship between early statin compliance and a reduction in healthcare utilization? Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(6):459–66.
  14. Natarajan P, Young R, Stitziel NO, Padmanabhan S, Baber U, Mehran R, et al. Polygenic risk score identifies subgroup with higher burden of atherosclerosis and greater relative benefit from statin therapy in the primary prevention setting. Circulation. 2017;135(22):2091–101. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Cooper-DeHoff RM, Niemi M, Ramsey LB, Luzum JA, Tarkiainen EK, Straka RJ, et al. The clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guideline for SLCO1B1, ABCG2, and CYP2C9 genotypes and statin-associated musculoskeletal symptoms. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022;111(5):1007–21. · DOI
  16. Türkmen D, Masoli JAH, Kuo C, Bowden J, Melzer D, Pilling LC. Statin treatment effectiveness and the SLCO1B1 *5 reduced function genotype: Long‐term outcomes in women and men. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022;88(7):3230–40. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.15245. · DOI
  17. Cordioli M, Corbetta A, Kariis HM, Jukarainen S, Vartiainen P, Kiiskinen T, et al. Socio-demographic and genetic risk factors for drug adherence and persistence across 5 common medication classes. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):9156. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-53556-z. · DOI
  18. Sadler MC, Apostolov A, Cevallos C, Ribeiro DM, Altman RB, Kutalik Z. Leveraging large-scale biobank EHRs to enhance pharmacogenetics of cardiometabolic disease medications. 2024. Available from: http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2024.04.06.24305415. · DOI
  19. Olarte Parra C, Daniel RM, Bartlett JW. Hypothetical estimands in clinical trials: a unification of causal inference and missing data methods. Stat Biopharm Res. 2023;15(2):421–32. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19466315.2022.2081599. · DOI
  20. Sampson M, Ling C, Sun Q, Harb R, Ashmaig M, Warnick R, et al. A New Equation for Calculation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With Normolipidemia and/or Hypertriglyceridemia. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(5):540. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2761953. · DOI
  21. Casanova F, Tian Q, Atkins JL, Wood AR, Williamson D, Qian Y, et al. Iron and risk of dementia: mendelian randomisation analysis in UK biobank. J Med Genet. 2024;jmg-2023–109295. Available from: https://jmg.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/jmg-2023-109295. · DOI
  22. Murrin O, Mounier N, Voller B, Tata L, Gallego-Moll C, Roso-Llorach A, et al. A systematic analysis of the contribution of genetics to multimorbidity and comparisons with primary care data. eBioMedicine. 2025;113:105584. · DOI
  23. Postmus I, Trompet S, Deshmukh HA, Barnes MR, Li X, Warren HR, et al. Pharmacogenetic meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of LDL cholesterol response to statins. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5068. · DOI
  24. Blackwell M, Glynn AN. How to make causal inferences with time-series cross-sectional data under selection on observables. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2018;112(4):1067–82. · DOI
  25. Robins JM, Hernán MA, Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiol Camb Mass. 2000;11(5):550–60. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Austin PC. Assessing covariate balance when using the generalized propensity score with quantitative or continuous exposures. Stat Methods Med Res. 2019;28(5):1365–77. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0962280218756159. · DOI
  27. Bishop CD, Leite WL, Snyder PA. Using propensity score weighting to reduce selection bias in large-scale data sets. J Early Interv. 2018;40(4):347–62. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1053815118793430. · DOI
  28. Bycroft C, Freeman C, Petkova D, Band G, Elliott LT, Sharp K, et al. The UK biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature. 2018;562(7726):203–9. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0579-z. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Lopez A, Cacoub P, Macdougall IC, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Iron deficiency anaemia. The Lancet. 2016;387(10021):907–16. · DOI
  30. Carr DF, Francis B, Jorgensen AL, Zhang E, Chinoy H, Heckbert SR, et al. Genomewide association study of statin-induced myopathy in patients recruited using the UK clinical practice research datalink. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;106(6):1353–61. · DOI
  31. Forbes CA, Deshpande ,Sohan, Sorio-Vilela ,Francesc, Kutikova ,Lucie, Duffy ,Steven, Gouni-Berthold ,Ioanna, et al. A systematic literature review comparing methods for the measurement of patient persistence and adherence. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018;34(9):1613–25. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Cordioli M, Corbetta A, Kariis HM, Jukarainen S, Vartiainen P, Kiiskinen T, et al. Socio-demographic and genetic risk factors for drug adherence and persistence: a retrospective nationwide and biobank study across 5 medication classes and 1 845 665 individuals. 2023. Available from: http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2023.10.09.23296740. · DOI
  33. Aarnio EJ, Martikainen JA, Helin-Salmivaara A, Huupponen RK, Hartikainen JEK, Peura PK, et al. Register-based predictors of adherence among new statin users in Finland. J Clin Lipidol. 2014;8(1):117–25. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1933287413002973. · DOI
  34. Lemstra M, Blackburn D, Crawley A, Fung R. Proportion and risk indicators of nonadherence to statin therapy: a meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28(5):574–80.
  35. Ahn J, Lee S, Won S. Possible link between statin and iron deficiency anemia: A South Korean nationwide population-based cohort study. Sci Adv. 2023;9(43):eadg6194. Available from: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adg6194. · DOI
  36. Mascitelli L, Goldstein MR. Might the beneficial effects of statin drugs be related to their action on iron metabolism? QJM. 2012;105(12):1225–9. Available from: https://acadeamic.oup.com/qjmed/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcs204. · DOI
  37. Zacharski LR, DePalma RG, Shamayeva G, Chow BK. The statin–iron nexus: anti-inflammatory intervention for arterial disease prevention. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(4):e105. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3673278/. · DOI
  38. Yu S, Chu Y, Li G, Ren L, Zhang Q, Wu L. Statin Use and the Risk of Cataracts: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc Cardiovasc Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;6(3):e004180. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5523994/. · DOI
  39. Bowden J, Madsen J, Goldman B, Iversen AT, Liang X, Vansteelandt S. Instrumental Variable methods to target Hypothetical Estimands with longitudinal repeated measures data: Application to the STEP 1 trial. arXiv; 2024. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02902. · DOI
  40. Bowden J, Pilling LC, Türkmen D, Kuo CL, Melzer D. The Triangulation WIthin a STudy (TWIST) framework for causal inference within pharmacogenetic research. Kutalik Z, editor. PLOS Genet. 2021;17(9):e1009783. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009783. · DOI
  41. Alver M, Kasela S, Haring L, Luitva LB, Fischer K, Möls M, et al. Genetic predisposition and antipsychotic treatment effect on metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia: a ten-year follow-up study using the estonian biobank. Lancet Reg Health - Eur. 2024;41:100914. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666776224000814. · DOI
  42. Mayerhofer E, Malik R, Parodi L, Burgess S, Harloff A, Dichgans M, et al. Genetically predicted on-statin LDL response is associated with higher intracerebral haemorrhage risk. Brain J Neurol. 2022;145(8):2677–86. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Türkmen, D., Liang, X., Masoli, J. A. H., Gill, D., Pilling, L. C., & Bowden, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Bowden, Jack
Venue
BMC Medicine
Published
2025-07-22
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
436-436
ISSN
1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412572587
Cited by
6
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6
FWCI
8.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository (Royal Devon and Exeter) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • UK Medical Research Council research grant (MR/X011372/1)
  • National Institute for Health Research Fellowship (NIHR301445)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
statin adherence, LDL cholesterol lowering, atorvastatin, simvastatin, proportion of days covered, pharmacogenetics, iron deficiency anemia, cataract, coronary artery disease, statin adverse effects, primary care prescribing, UK Biobank, causal models, inverse probability of treatment weighting
MeSH terms
Atorvastatin, UK Biobank, Aged, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Biological Specimen Banks, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Simvastatin, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review