Cited by 22Asthma and respiratory diseasesOccupational exposure and asthmaChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Subtypes of asthma based on asthma control and severity: a latent class analysis

Open access
Mäkikyrö, Elina M. S., Jaakkola, Maritta S., Jaakkola, Jouni J. K.·2017·Respiratory Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Asthma subtyping is a complex new field of study. Usually both etiological and outcome factors of asthma have been used simultaneously for subtyping thus making the interpretation of the results difficult. Identification of subtypes of asthma based on questionnaire data only will be useful for both treatment of asthma and for research. Our objective was to identify asthma subtypes that capture both asthma control and severity based on easily accessible variables. METHODS: We applied latent class analysis for the 1995 adult asthmatics, 692 men and 1303 women, of the Northern Finnish Asthma Study (NoFAS). The classifying variables included use of asthma medication within the last 12 months, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score, and asthma-related healthcare use within the last 12 months. Covariates adjusted for included COPD, allergic rhinitis/allergic eczema, BMI, age and sex. All information was based on self-administered questionnaires. RESULTS: We identified four subtypes for women: Controlled, mild asthma (41% of participants); Partly controlled, moderate asthma (24%); Uncontrolled asthma, unknown severity (26%), and Uncontrolled, severe asthma (9%). For men we identified three subtypes: Controlled, mild asthma (31%); Poorly controlled asthma, unknown severity (53%); and Partly controlled, severe asthma (17%). For almost 96% of the subjects this subtyping was accurate. The covariates fitted in the model were based on clinical judgment and were good predictors of class membership. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that it is possible to form meaningful and accurate asthma subtypes based on questionnaire data, and that separate classification should be applied for men and women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12931-017-0508-y

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Latent class analysis methods are able to identify novel and statistically distinct classes among individuals in a relatively unbiased way, based on measured variables that relate to asthma symptoms and/or biomarkers such as bronchial hyperresponsiveness and atopy.

    “Essentially, LCA methods are able to identify novel and statistically distinct classes among individuals in a relatively unbiased way, and are based on measured variables that relate to asthma symptoms (26) and/or biomarkers such as bronchial hyperresponsiveness and atopy (27, 28).”

    From Epidemiology of Asthma in Children and Adults (2019) · cites this paper as [26]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mäkikyrö, E. M. S., Jaakkola, M. S., & Jaakkola, J. J. K.
Affiliations
University of Oulu (FI)
Corresponding author
Jaakkola, Jouni J. K.
Venue
Respiratory Research
Published
2017-01-23
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
24-24
ISSN
  • 1465-9921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-993X
OpenAlex
W2580242289
Cited by
22
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Respiratory Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Emil Aaltosen Säätiö
  • Research Foundation of the Pulmonary diseases
  • The Väinö and Laina Kivi Foundation
  • Finnish Anti-Tuberculosis Association
  • Terveyden Tutkimuksen Toimikunta (266314)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
asthma subtypes, asthma control, asthma severity, latent class analysis, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, asthma medication use, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Asthma, Finland, Humans, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Prevalence, Multivariate Analysis, Sex Distribution, Young Adult, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review